aronwk Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 Upgraded from 6.9.2 to 6.10.3 and none of my share are exportable, and several of my file permissions are messed up. Everything is still there, but with these issues. Attached are diagnostics. zerotwo-diagnostics-20220921-1711.zip Quote Link to comment
trurl Posted September 21, 2022 Share Posted September 21, 2022 What do you get from command line with this? ls -la /mnt/user 1 Quote Link to comment
aronwk Posted September 21, 2022 Author Share Posted September 21, 2022 5 minutes ago, trurl said: What do you get from command line with this? ls -la /mnt/user this is the output: d-wx-wx-wx 1 nobody users 119 Sep 21 17:25 ./ drwxr-xr-x 27 root root 540 Sep 21 16:25 ../ drwx------ 1 nobody users 43 Nov 5 2018 .Trash-99/ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 2452 Aug 9 14:14 appdata/ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 46 Feb 19 2022 backups/ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 26 Nov 18 2021 domains/ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 372 Sep 21 16:28 downloads/ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 24 Mar 7 2021 firefly_iii/ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 65 Oct 26 2021 fogserver/ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 17 Jul 4 21:22 general/ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 76 Jul 4 21:50 ghidra/ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 6 Jun 27 2020 git/ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 272 Nov 16 2021 isos/ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 234 Oct 19 2021 media/ drwxrwx--- 1 nobody users 40 Sep 13 21:25 nextcloud/ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 74 Mar 29 13:10 pre-downloads/ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 20 Dec 30 2021 syncthing/ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 6 Nov 5 2021 syslog/ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 26 Mar 7 2021 system/ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 6 Sep 21 16:29 test/ drwxrwxrwx 1 nobody users 29 Aug 6 22:12 www/ Quote Link to comment
Solution trurl Posted September 21, 2022 Solution Share Posted September 21, 2022 1 Quote Link to comment
aronwk Posted September 21, 2022 Author Share Posted September 21, 2022 nice! that fixed the shares showing up and then I'm trying the docker safe new perms mentioned there right now Quote Link to comment
nivagator Posted October 1, 2022 Share Posted October 1, 2022 On 9/21/2022 at 5:38 PM, trurl said: What do you get from command line with this? ls -la /mnt/user Running into this issue multiple times today editing photos in a share. Unraid 6.10.3 Here is my output: $ ls -la /mnt/user /bin/ls: cannot access '/mnt/user': Transport endpoint is not connected Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted October 2, 2022 Share Posted October 2, 2022 10 hours ago, nivagator said: /bin/ls: cannot access '/mnt/user': Transport endpoint is not connected Please post the diagnostics. Quote Link to comment
nivagator Posted October 4, 2022 Share Posted October 4, 2022 On 10/2/2022 at 3:40 AM, JorgeB said: Please post the diagnostics. Diagnostics attached. galaxy-diagnostics-20221004-1110.zip Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted October 4, 2022 Share Posted October 4, 2022 24 minutes ago, nivagator said: Diagnostics attached. shfs crashed, rebooting should bring the shares back, if you are not using NFS disable it since it looks like the crash was related to that. Quote Link to comment
nivagator Posted October 4, 2022 Share Posted October 4, 2022 I saw that shfs crash and found your post here. Different service, but could it be memory overclocking related? I am using NFS almost exclusively to access shares on my local network. I can replicate this failure nearly on command modifying or deleting images on a Linux client connected via NFS. Its typically on my third or fourth save or delete, the shares crash. Rebooting does restore the shares, but again, I happens consistently. I haven't had this issue with any other usecase and all other services are working as expected. I've been running this system for almost two years with no problems until this error. Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted October 4, 2022 Share Posted October 4, 2022 8 minutes ago, nivagator said: but could it be memory overclocking related? Unlikely that just NFS would crash, I've never used NFS so cannot really help with that but try updating to v6.11.0, newer kernel might help. Quote Link to comment
nivagator Posted October 5, 2022 Share Posted October 5, 2022 Updated to 6.11.0 and it crashed immediately on the first attempt deleting files over nfs. This effectively makes the Unraid shares unusable... Anything else I can look into? Same segfault on shfs Oct 4 21:41:47 galaxy kernel: shfs[12888]: segfault at 10 ip 000015002048f5c2 sp 000015001f05fc20 error 4 in libfuse3.so.3.12.0[15002048b000+19000] Oct 4 21:41:47 galaxy kernel: Code: f4 c8 ff ff 8b b3 08 01 00 00 85 f6 0f 85 46 01 00 00 4c 89 ee 48 89 df 45 31 ff e8 18 dc ff ff 4c 89 e7 45 31 e4 48 8b 40 20 <4c> 8b 68 10 e8 15 c2 ff ff 48 8d 4c 24 18 45 31 c0 31 d2 4c 89 ee Oct 4 21:41:47 galaxy kernel: ------------[ cut here ]------------ Oct 4 21:41:47 galaxy kernel: nfsd: non-standard errno: -107 Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted October 5, 2022 Share Posted October 5, 2022 Lets see if @dlandonhas any ideas. Quote Link to comment
dlandon Posted October 5, 2022 Share Posted October 5, 2022 16 hours ago, nivagator said: but could it be memory overclocking related? Are you overclocking memory? Quote Link to comment
dlandon Posted October 5, 2022 Share Posted October 5, 2022 Several suggestions: If you are overclocking memory, don't. Overclocking memory on a server is not recommended. Start by updating all your dockers and plugins. You are behind in quite a few. I doubt it will fix anything, but just eliminate that possibility. NerdPack is not compatible with 6.11. Be sure to remove the plugin and reboot. If you are on 6.10, remove the NerdPack plugin and reboot as a test. Try removing the nvidia drivers plugin. I saw a reference to nvidia drivers in the segfault. Quote Link to comment
nivagator Posted October 6, 2022 Share Posted October 6, 2022 Disabled memory overclocking, updated to 6.11, updated all plugins and docker, removed NerdPack. Still occurring. Using Thunar File Manager on the client system. I said the error occurred when deleting files, but technically, i was clicking "Move to Trash". I enabled Delete in the Context Menu and have had no issues when choosing Delete and not Move to Trash. I'm assuming this is relevant, though I'm not experienced enough to know what it means. Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.