Jump to content

More Hard Drives or BIGGER Hard Drives - Which is Better? [NASCompares]


peterg23

Recommended Posts

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SUXOiNRfD0w

 

The technology behind hard drives has evolved RAPIDLY! In just the last few years we have seen HDDs hit over 20 terabytes, seen the number of platters being squeezed into a single hard drive casing reach more than 10 and the performance and durability of these drives somehow continue to improve too! Still, one area that we have seen very little change in over the years is the price per terabyte of most HDDs. Despite the range of capacities available from most HDD brands (Seagate, WD, Toshiba, etc), the cost of the latest and largest HDDs still maintains a hefty price tag, whilst the smaller capacity drives (still broadly keeping their lower price point) are more readily available, occasionally on offer and this leads alot of data storage buyers to ask themselves - Is it better to buy a small number of MASSIVE hard drives or a larger number of SMALLER HDDs? Thanks to modern development and efficient evolution of RAID (redundant array of independent disk) management in NAS and DAS systems*, alongside storage enclosures now ranging from as little as 2 Bay desktop case scale all the way upto 24-60 Bay rackmounts, it is actually quite easy to achieve the same amount of capacity of a handful of 'max capacity' drives with a smaller cluster of more affordable smaller drives. So, today I want to look into the benefits/downfalls of either setup and hopefully help you decide whether you need to opt for bigger or smaller hard drives in your data storage setup in 2023 onwards.

Link to comment

I would vote for bigger (and fewer) drives. This saves energy and ports. It is always good to have a spare port or two in case of the array disks fill up (mine are all 18Tb, so there is currently no real chance to find seriously bigger ones, maybe the next one will be 20+ but goes into parity first for some years)

(the downside is that every copy/move operation takes much longer because of the higher capacity to be copied/moved. So things that took hours now become taking days. But I can live with this 🙂 )

 

Edited by MAM59
  • Upvote 1
Link to comment

Aim for bigger and fewer, but consider your needs.  If you've been getting by just fine with 3 2TB disks, does it make sense to replace with 3 20TB disks plus potentially retaining the 3x 2TB?  Probably not.  I personally haven't seen a significant price difference between 2 smaller vs 1 bigger capacity of same brand.

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...