klompa Posted January 1, 2019 Share Posted January 1, 2019 Hi guys I'm very new to this. I have 4 drives in my array 2x 500gb and 2x 320. The drives I have are for testing atm I will be installing 3x 4tb drives later. I have a 500gb as Parity and the other drives as storage. When I'm copy data to the array only the 500gb is used until I get the (there is not enough space on ****) when I still have 2x 320gb drives in the array that are empty. Included disks is set to all, Split level is set to automatically split any directory as required and for Allocation method I have tried (high water) and most free) with the same results. I don't know if it is something I'm doing wrong or missing but any help would be great. Cheers Klompa Link to comment
Squid Posted January 1, 2019 Share Posted January 1, 2019 Possibilities Allocation Method for the share is set to be fill up You've changed at some point the global share includes to only include the first disk. Change it to include all disks (deselect anything checked off) Share includes only the one drive. See above Link to comment
trurl Posted January 1, 2019 Share Posted January 1, 2019 Go to Tools - Diagnostics and attach the complete diagnostics zip file to your next post. Link to comment
klompa Posted January 1, 2019 Author Share Posted January 1, 2019 Cheers for the reply's guys Squid 1. I have tried high water and most-free for the Allocation Method it is set to Most-Free at the moment. 2. In global share settings Included disk's is set to all. 3. In shares the Included disk's is set to all. trurl Is this the right attached file? thanks again guys. warp9-diagnostics-20190101-1141.zip Link to comment
trurl Posted January 1, 2019 Share Posted January 1, 2019 I assume you are talking about the share (anonymized) name m----------r. I have never seen this and it really seems like it shouldn't cause a problem, but you have that share set as cache-prefer, which is not typically what you would want since that means the share should try to stay on cache. The setting for a cached share that you want moved to the array is cache-yes. But, you don't actually have a cache disk, so the setting you have is sort of meaningless. I would have expected it to overflow to the array based on the other user share settings so allocation method should apply. Change the setting to either cache-yes or cache-no and see if that fixes it. And I would recommend high-water allocation. Note that making this change will not move any of the existing data. User share settings only apply to new files. Link to comment
klompa Posted January 1, 2019 Author Share Posted January 1, 2019 That is the right share I know about the cashe that was me trying to get it to work. This is the 3rd time I've tried to get this to work 1st was on 6.6.6 and then 6.6.3 now back to 6.6.6 and the disks were formatted each time. Just a quick question I have been copy files over in 300gb or 200gb sets. Once you start a copying task does that copy stay on 1 drive? Link to comment
klompa Posted January 1, 2019 Author Share Posted January 1, 2019 I've formatted the drives and rebooted will see what happens in 5 hours cheers Link to comment
trurl Posted January 1, 2019 Share Posted January 1, 2019 30 minutes ago, klompa said: Just a quick question I have been copy files over in 300gb or 200gb sets. Once you start a copying task does that copy stay on 1 drive? How are you doing the copy? I have seen rsync create all folders in advance before writing any files, which results in all files going to one disk since the folders by themselves didn't take enough space to trigger allocation method then the files went to those already created folders. Link to comment
klompa Posted January 1, 2019 Author Share Posted January 1, 2019 just in windows from a share from a drive attached to my router to a share in unraid. Link to comment
trurl Posted January 1, 2019 Share Posted January 1, 2019 Maybe the destination folders are getting created in advance. Might be something to watch for. Link to comment
klompa Posted January 1, 2019 Author Share Posted January 1, 2019 yeah that was my thinking doing it in smaller sets now thanks again guys Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.