-
Windows 11: Recent Update (KB5058499) Disabled VM! Processor Unsupported
Thanks @alturismo and @geekunraid for your help, really appreciate both of your replies. @geekunraid looks like that setting did the trick! Thank you so much I have the following settings working perfectly again now on my Ryzen 5950X: <features> <acpi/> <apic eoi='off'/> <hyperv mode='passthrough'> </hyperv> <kvm> <hidden state='on'/> </kvm> <vmport state='off'/> <ioapic driver='kvm'/> </features> <cpu mode='host-passthrough' check='none' migratable='off'> <topology sockets='1' dies='1' clusters='1' cores='[SETME]' threads='[SETME]'/> <cache mode='passthrough'/> <feature policy='require' name='x2apic'/> <feature policy='require' name='tsc-deadline'/> <feature policy='require' name='hypervisor'/> <feature policy='require' name='tsc_adjust'/> <feature policy='disable' name='arch-capabilities'/> <feature policy='require' name='cmp_legacy'/> <feature policy='require' name='perfctr_core'/> <feature policy='require' name='virt-ssbd'/> <feature policy='disable' name='monitor'/> <feature policy='disable' name='svm'/> <feature policy='require' name='topoext'/> </cpu> <clock offset='localtime'> <timer name='rtc' tickpolicy='catchup'/> <timer name='pit' tickpolicy='delay'/> <timer name='tsc' present='yes' tickpolicy='merge' mode='native'/> <timer name='hypervclock' present='yes'/> </clock> And <qemu:commandline> <qemu:arg value='-fw_cfg'/> <qemu:arg value='opt/ovmf/X-PciMmio64Mb,string=65536'/> <qemu:arg value='-overcommit'/> <qemu:arg value='cpu-pm=off'/> <qemu:arg value='-global'/> <qemu:arg value='q35-pcihost.pci-hole64-size=2048G'/> <qemu:arg value='-machine'/> <qemu:arg value='max-ram-below-4g=4G'/> </qemu:commandline>
-
Windows 11: Recent Update (KB5058499) Disabled VM! Processor Unsupported
Thanks, but I'm talking about Hyper-V passthrough specifically. CPU passthrough still works for me.
-
Windows 11: Recent Update (KB5058499) Disabled VM! Processor Unsupported
Just wondering - can anyone else confirm if <hyperv mode='passthrough'> works for them after this update? I'm running a Ryzen 5 5950x.
-
Windows 11: Recent Update (KB5058499) Disabled VM! Processor Unsupported
Had the same issue. Took me a long time to resolve it properly. Weirdly, I can't boot into Windows if I have <hyperv mode='passthrough'> specified - I will still get the Unsupported Processor error in this case. This never used to happen. It appears to have negatively impacted gaming performance for me.
-
PLEX would not start with 7.0
@rushgunner have you got the Intel-GPU-TOP plugin installed? You might need this for an intel iGPU. Make sure it's updated.
-
7.0.0-Beta2 Gaming Performance
Hello, I've noticed a severe drop off in gaming performance in 7.0 Beta 2. Unfortunately this isn't a very scientific comparison at the moment because I was previously running the Thor kernel (6.9.5) whilst using Unraid 6.12.10 (I have an Intel ARC GPU so wanted the inbuilt drivers at one stage). I noticed that performance had dropped off in 7.0 Beta 2 (Diablo IV goes from 120fps to 20fps and barely any CPU/GPU utilisation). After changing the stock kernel over to the thor version performance is back where it should be. I recognise custom kernels are unsupported however I am hoping that the mainline kernel can be brought up to the same level of performance. Happy to complete profiling etc if there is something I can do to help get it there. I will capture some screenshots later today. Captured full video + kernel configuration dumps (see post below). Thanks! -Ross
-
ross232 started following 7.0.0-Beta2 VM Editing Display Issues
-
7.0.0-Beta2 VM Editing Display Issues
Just reporting some theming weirdness in the VM editing screen. Everything seems compressed and the hide inline XML and form view selectors are spaced a bit oddly. Also the section for pass through (USB devices) is not aligned properly.
-
Is ZFS the future of Unraid? Do you want it to be?
I don't think ZFS is displacing any of the existing file system options. It's just another option you can optionally choose to use. In my case I'm using individual ZFS formatted drives in a normal parity protected array. The advantage here is that you can use snapshots, compression etc. But I retain the advantage of being able to use disks of different size and I can mount them individually. I also use ZFS on my cache drives because I don't love the way BTRFS reports free-space and have had issues with this in the past. I can see why there are use cases for people wanting a full ZFS array too. If speed is a priority then this will always win out over a parity + cache combo. People doing media creation (e.g. YouTubers etc) may want to start with a parity array, then migrate to a full ZFS backed one later. Add in the paid support options UNRAID now has and you have something you can rely on as your needs grow/change.
-
ross232 started following Unassigned Devices - Passthrough Location
-
Unassigned Devices - Passthrough Location
Hello, Does anyone know which file unassigned devices writes it's passthrough configuration to? I am having trouble with a VM. In the libvirt log I can see that it can't resolve a disk previously passed through as I have physically removed it. I can no longer change that configuration via the UI. Thanks, Ross
-
ross232 started following 6.12.0-RC1 VMs do not display
-
6.12.0-RC1 VMs do not display
After upgrading to 6.12.0-RC1 Virtual Machines are not displaying. In the dashboard these are visible. If a VM was set to autostart it is actually running. Virtual Machines are correctly shown using virsh list-all: root@Tower:~# virsh list --all Id Name State ------------------------------------ 1 Fedora Silverblue running - Fedora SB shut off - Windows 11 shut off tower-diagnostics-20230317-0554.zip
-
Unraid OS version 6.11.1 available
@SimonF Any reason chroot has to be used for virtiofs? Namespace doesn't want to load for me. Also - Virtiofs doesn't appear to lock up my Fedora Silverblue VM. I wonder if there is any common thread to the reports.
-
Unraid OS version 6.11.1 available
I can get it mounted in linux and write permissions seem to work as well. I just wish it would work for Steam/Proton games - I think flock or symlink functionality might not be working. Here's my config. I have this in my VM XML (memoryBacking also has hugepages but I've removed it from here): <memoryBacking> <source type='memfd'/> <access mode='shared'/> </memoryBacking> <filesystem type='mount' accessmode='passthrough'> <driver type='virtiofs' queue='1024'/> <binary path='/usr/libexec/virtiofsd' xattr='on'> <cache mode='always'/> <sandbox mode='chroot'/> <lock posix='on' flock='on'/> </binary> <source dir='/mnt/user/'/> <target dir='shares'/> <alias name='fs0'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x01' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/> </filesystem> And the following in my /etc/fstab in my VM: shares /mnt/unraid virtiofs 0 0 NB: You must create /mnt/unraid first in the VM.
-
Unraid OS version 6.11.1 available
Does anyone have virtiofs working with Steam games? Specifically those that use Proton? I can't launch games when I do it I get 'OSError: [Errno 95] Operation not supported'. Non proton games seem to work OK.
-
[Support] ich777 - AMD Vendor Reset, CoralTPU, hpsahba,...
Oh I've got it now, thanks!
-
[Support] ich777 - AMD Vendor Reset, CoralTPU, hpsahba,...
Hi @ich777. I've noticed that 6.10.0-rc1 has dropped. The release notes mention the GNIF plugin but I can't find it. Has it been released yet? Thanks Ross.
ross232
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited