spants

I have no idea - it should work! (sorry, I know that isn't a proper answer. I will reinstall my setup and check in a couple of days)

You probably could by adding extra keys, but you can also spin up another docker (use one for each printer)-that is what I did!

Bridge network gives you that option

best to use the /dev/serial/by-id/ method rather than usbtty as the port may change if you plug the printers in differently

just create a strong user/password and use port forwarding from your router to the mqtt port?.

yes, I see a few people on the internet see the same problem. I wonder if adding --user="nobody:users" to extra parameters would make a difference?. Otherwise you may have to chmod the data directory = https://github.com/node-red/node-red-docker/wiki/Permissions-and-Persistence

Its not my docker, but did you fix it? I use the zigbee2mqtt docker as well so I will try and help

You can change your own: chgange the repository field to nodered/node-red:2.1.6-16

I have been using a similar solution for sometime - based on opnsense firewall and wireguard. Once you understand the basics, it is very easy to setup and use!

is this with a new blank appdata/pihole directory? try a different name name to make sure (I had issues with permissions from an old installation). Is 192.168.1.99 already in use elsewhere? ... thats all I can think of at the moment

I updated it a few days ago - let me know if it doesnt work for you. I tested it on a new adddata directory to be sure. I have not added "env. variable 'DNSMASQ_USER' with value = 'root'" in a couple of posts up as this is a temporary docker issue.

I will add the keys to the pihole template .... btw, the template is not official but it uses the official docker image

try setting the permissions of the appdata directory for node red chmod 755 /mnt/appdata/node-red (or whatever you have called it)

Edited the pihole template which now uses the new DNS variables. The old variables had been deprecated.

The template just uses the official PiHole docker - it seems that there is a discussion here that may help https://github.com/pi-hole/docker-pi-hole/issues/922 . You could also change the docker tag to load a specific version: see here https://hub.docker.com/r/pihole/pihole/tags I do not use PiHole now as I have adguard installed on my firewall so I cannot test.... But just to repeat - this is the offical docker image and not related to the template itself.

Does the octoprint backup/restore not work for you?

This actually uses the official container - I just updated the template and researched how to get the video drivers working. Glad it is working for you. If you use the CA backup application, make sure that it does not turn off the docker (adv settings) or you will lose a long print!

see here:

I have created a new docker template for Octoprint using the official docker images and supporting webcam streaming. You need video drivers installed on unRaid for the kernel to see a camera. (on Version: 6.10.0-rc1) - install DVB Drivers in Community Apps and select LibreELEC This will need a reboot after installation plug in your camera, you should see /dev/video0 appear in a terminal session on unRaid Install OctoPrint-Spants add the following: variables: ENABLE_MJPG_STREAMER true CAMERA_DEV /dev/video0 MJPG_STREAMER_INPUT -y -n -r 640x480 (can change to suit) port: webcam container port 80 host port 5003 snapshot container port 8080 host port 5004 In octoprint's webcam settings set the stream url to http://IPADDRESS:5003/webcam/?action=stream and test - it should work set the snapshot url to http://IPADDRESS:5004/?action=snapshot and test IPADDRESS is your unraid server address if you used bridge networking

Happy for you to do that.

I see that nunofgs hasnt updated his docker - I will try and use a different base docker - stay tuned!. (I stopped using the docker after a long print was ruined by the backup routine tuning off the docker after 8 hours of printing!. My fault - I should have excluded that docker from switching off. I will investigate a solution) @Mizz141 *** I see that Mearman already has a template using the official docker - have you tried that? ***

****** Please use the Official Template for Photostructure instead of this one ******* You have an offical template now folks - my beta template will be retired.

I am working with Matthew on updating the templates..... stay tuned.

I didn't have notifications on... Sorry that I didn't see all of the comments

Sure, no problem at all. All I did was a quick template as a favour... Happy if you want to release another and I can remove mine.