Pretty confident - other desktop on Wifie 6E has the same results.
Was just tring to turning bridging off as sugegsted in another post, added the router to eth0 and now unRAID is inaccesable. Think I've just bricked my entire NAS...
Hey All,
I 'think' i'm getting slow transfer speeds from my Desktop to UnRAID (NvME Cache) - approx 50 - 60 Mbps.
UnRAID is connected to router via 2.5 Gbe ports and shows as 2500 Mbps, full duplex, mtu 1500 in Unraid.
Ran iperf, and Bandwidth only showing between 168 to 181 Mbits/sec.
How do I improve this?
alfred-diagnostics-20231123-1244.zip
This has become an issue again. Im now on my THIRD drive! All drives fail in Disk 1.
Drive 1 - Seek Error Rate of less than 30. RMA'd and replaced with new device.
Drive 2 - Seek Error Rate of less than 40. RMA's again and replaced with another new device.
Drive 3 - Been in overnight and Seek Error currently at 92 and dropping, even with no data being used/pulled from the Array.
I'm losing my marbles! @JorgeB I heard you run lots of Toshibas. Any thoughts?
I just cant understand why its always Disk 1 thats failing and not my Parity or Disk 2.
2nd Failure just occured *insert crying gif here*
Do you think the fact I'm using my NAS as a Media Server has anything to do with it? For clarity, both disk failures have been Disk 1.
Wish I'd have seen this before buying N300s...
Bought 3x 16 TB. One failed SMART with a Seek_Error_Rate, so bought a 4th so I could swap out and RMA the 3rd.
Still waiting for the RMA to come back, but the replacement drive I bought is now extremly close to the threshold and I'm worry thats going to fail on that test too!
It's not even been online for more than 4 days!!
Curious what everyone's expereince with the N300 is like?
I've got a total of 4, all within 30 days old. One already RMA'ed due to Seek_Error_Rate passing 50 Threshold, and another currently running pretty close to the threshold.
Are they just pants and should I avoid the N300's in future?