JonathanM

If your parity is intact and working, only do 1 drive at a time. Reason being, each write has to update the parity drive, so if you do both at once, the parity drive will be trying to keep up with both at once, limiting the transfer speed to somewhat less than each one individually.

Unless you already have SSL certificates well in hand, I strongly suggest learning and using nginx so you can take advantage of the super easy nginx-letsencrypt SSL infrastructure provided in aptalca's docker. (No offense meant to LSIO, it's just so much easier to get SSL running that way)

Short answer, you don't. You wait for arch linux to update it in their repository and then either wait for binhex to update the docker or exec in and update it manually. From what I've read I'm not even sure an upgrade is what we want, it may be fixed by downgrading to 4.2. This doesn't look like a simple issue.

Can't help with the issue, but I'm genuinely curious if switching to nzbget would fix the problem? I'm still using SAB, so if nzbget doesn't suffer from the same problem, it may be another reason to switch.

decided the pro's of echoing this out (for debugging for user) is not worth the risk, i will be obfuscating this from now on for all users, including the username. Can you parse for authentication errors and echo only if error occurs?

You probably should change your password.

I suspect it's a threading issue, I've seen similar behaviour when manipulating multiple items. Does the connection restore itself after waiting a bit?

Torrent files are not very granular, oftentimes it's necessary to download a portion or all of a file you don't want in order to get the remaining piece for the file that you do. The size of the chunks is up to the person authoring the original torrent file, following general best practices and site guidelines.

Keep in mind not all of the PIA nodes offer incoming, so if seeding is important, be sure you use a node that lets you be "connectable". nl definitely does, I don't know if any of the US do.

Which gateway? The nl seems to work for most people.

Refund policy?

MY EYES! MY EYES! The image, it burns.

This... More importantly, STOP the file integrity tools from blindly calculating new checksums on the newly minted files, and go into check only mode.

Is this for manually added torrents, or automatically sent from another application like sonarr?

Unfortunately that is going to clash with the power down system of unraid. When unraid receives a power button signal, it starts the shutdown process. Remapping that to start a VM is probably not a good idea.

I suggest a forum section for video tutorials, where only mods can start new threads. Move all the current tutorials there, with sticky pointer posts in the relevant support areas.

Well, unlike transmission, the deluge remote IS the full GUI. You just point it to either the local instance or the remote instance, whichever suits. There really isn't a separate deluge remote app. You install deluge on the local machine, and point it at the server.

Just curious here. What do you like about the Transmission remote? A couple years ago I used to use Transmission with the remote, but when I switched to Deluge and its remote, I like the Deluge remote better. I have the Deluge remote on multiple machines, debian linux, mint, even W7 and W8.1, and they all connect seamlessly to 2 different Deluge instances running on unraid.

Agree ... as I noted above, this is absolutely the "... SAFEST approach " to ensuring you never have any key transfer issues like jonathanm outlined earlier. New test for FCP maybe Hmm. Since if a flash drive dies, the only files that matter are the backups, could you strip all unmatched key files out of the CA backup but leave them on the physical flash? I don't know if it's even possible to tell which file is in use at a given time without access to Tom's proprietary code. If you could accomplish it, that would assure no collisions should it become necessary to use your backup to get a new key. I don't think renaming it is necessary. Pretty sure the code checks all .key files.

Yeah, two unrelated ease of use options which unfortunately can collide in a bad way. The ability to put all your key files together on each key came well before the online key replacement system IIRC.

It will check all keys until it finds the correct one so having multiple keys on the drive doesn't matter. I have both of my keys on both of my systems. How did you get these blacklisted drives and blacklisted keys? They were blacklisted for a reason. You will have to contact [email protected] to get them replaced. They usually respond pretty quickly. I predicted this would happen. Key 1 fails. Restore backup containing all owned keys to Key 3. Start server. Keys 1 and 2 are found, none match new USB GUID, so automatic replacement process is initiated. Automatic replacement process picks Key 2 GUID for some reason, so the new license is assigned to Key 3, blacklisting Key 2's GUID. End result, blacklisted GUID for still working Key 2, Key 1 has failed, and Key 3 has Key 2's license. Short term solution, purchase another USB stick, find the correct license file for Key 1, and make sure that's the only key on the stick when you do the automatic replacement. Long term solution, keep better track of which license file goes with which physical USB. I'm drawing a blank on an effective way of keeping this from happening with the current automatic replacement system, short of denying a replacement if there are multiple license files on the key.

Not sure what you mean by not allowing VPN website access. Port forwarding is handled automatically if you are using PIA, and then only if you are using one of the gateways that has it enabled. If you are using another VPN provider, you will need to refer to their support to figure out if they even support incoming ports, many VPN providers don't.

(Couldn't resist) Where are the docker police when you need them?

http://www.subnet-calculator.com/cidr.php

I don't know if a plugin has enough permissions to make such a change, though. EDIT: Forgot to say thank you Takes time. But that actually have me a similar idea . Sent from my LG-D852 using Tapatalk How about... Stop SMB/AFP/NFS unmount drives remount readonly Start SMB/AFP/NFS