Jump to content

Johnm

Members
  • Posts

    2,484
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Johnm

  1. No, but i did have some drives on each controller. the P11 drives redballed AFTER i downgraded. (but still froze up) True, but some Bios versions might not be effected by kernel bugs. of course other LSI users could verify the issue. i just don't think you want to put your production box on the line just yet. LSI users are still a pretty small percentage of unraid users. it is only recently that there has been a real rush of USAS, m1015 and BR10i users. On the bright side, it looks like the MV8 issues might be fixed.. (I still have those for backup.)
  2. I just reflashed 2x M1015's I flashed both with madburg's bat files and upgraded one to P11 with zeron's bat I used an Asus AT3ION-I HTPC motherboard i had laying around. smooth as silk.
  3. Quick question guys, has anyone run a preclear on the m1015 in IT mode or did I miss a setting somewhere? I just tried to run it on 4 different 3TB drives on two dif controllers on 5beta12a. Pre-Clear unRAID Disk /dev/sdb ################################################################## 1.9 msmartctl may not be able to run on /dev/sdb with the -d ata option. however this should not affect the clearing of a disk. smartctl exit status = 2 smartctl 5.40 2010-10-16 r3189 [i486-slackware-linux-gnu] (local build) Copyright (C) 2002-10 by Bruce Allen, http://smartmontools.sourceforge.net Smartctl: Device Read Identity Failed (not an ATA/ATAPI device) A mandatory SMART command failed: exiting. To continue, add one or more '-T permissive' options.$ Do you wish to continue? (Answer Yes to continue. Capital 'Y', lower case 'es'): I moved the drives to my MV8 and it started the preclears just fine. I have no problem with this.. assuming the m1015 is working correctly. Keep in mind I have 2 M1015's and 1MV8 passed though to unraid in ESX. not that it "should" matter.. I just wanted to make sure I am on the correct path...
  4. Great idea. The problem you will need to overcome is airflow. The entire front is mesh so getting directed airflow will be a challenge. Also with the drives laid like that, there is no way to properly cool them unless the bottom is mesh and you can pull air up from bottom. I would build some sort of drive rack like this http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=2031.msg14880#msg14880 You also could block off some of the mesh from the inside to help direct/control air flow. Cooling is key for storage servers. Awesome Idea. Let us know how it works in the end.
  5. Someone built a 100tb home server on one of these. Here is the build log. http://hardforum.com/showthread.php?t=1512972
  6. it is the Rosewill RSV-Z2000 newegg has had this server on shell shocker a few times for about $20 off. I am not a fan of how the power supply is mounted in it. it has a poor airflow design. If you use a bottom mounted PSU in a rack, the server above it suffocates it. if you have it with nothing above it, it prone to debris (say a loose screw!) falling into the PSU. If you used a rear-exhaust PSU, the hot air from it gets blown out the front of the server and sucked right back into the drive bay. (that's still better then suffocation) other then that, for what it is, it looks fairly "clean" and an inexpensive way to get 9 hard drives into a single 2U server.
  7. A bit late on this.. It has been noted on some of the overclocker forums that LSI raid cards do not run correctly on the Asus X67 series of motherboards. I believe the problem stemmed from Asus not putting the correct electrical connectors on those mobos for the LSI cards to work correctly.
  8. they do the job. I prefer the supermicro units myself. I really should get the norco units since i have several RPC-4224's. That would allow me to switch drives easier between my rackmounts and towers. but I don't.. Most everyone has a preference to what they like. I like the supermicro hardware a bit better for its enterprise level quality. but, norco saves you a few bucks and does the job almost as well. [OT] Nexus Prominent 9 It will hold 3 5in3's. I had 3 in there but I had a defective backplane in my 3rd SM box (I got it open box and it was physically damaged by the previous owner). Since I have that as a 14 drive build. I replaced the defective unit with one of the 4in3's supplied with the case in the bottom section. Raj turned me onto it.. A very nice case. expensive, but worth it. [/ot]
  9. They have no "power" LED, just activity that is green, but not crazy bright. There is also a Yellow Fail LED that I belive only works with the correct hardware.
  10. While that sounds like a nice idea, It sounds like a big point of failure for data transfer. I think I would just like to see a rev. breakout cable the correct length. I assume this board has the EPS12V requirement? (as do the other tyan C202/C204 boards)
  11. looks like a nice board. I would use it. The only thing i dislike is it uses sata headers instead of SAS connectors.. that is not a big deal.
  12. remember that the command and path is all case sensitive and make sure you don't have a windows carriage return after the command Try copying the line from the go script and pasting it into putty and make sure it works.
  13. That reminds me of several WHS builds i have seen. 1 mediasmart server and lots and lots of external boxes.
  14. with a bit of work. you "could do it". from what I am seeing, 2 3.5" drives up top get to hot without a fan mod of some kind. I would stick to a single 3.5 or get some 2.5" drive in a 4in1 adapter.. that would be pretty expensive route IMO. If you really want 6x 3TB and 1x 2.5" drives, I would get an Supermicro atom board and a fractal mini R2 ITX. the footprint is about the same size and no modding needed. assemble and boot. the performance would be about the same. It will run you about $50 more.
  15. The -d 9 should tell it to go 9 folders in from root. Do you have enough ram? I would try a -i and do just the tv dir for testing. Also it could be the space in the filename. Turn on the logging and look Also at a console, restart it with -F -v I think watch in realtime what it does
  16. thats a nice way to hide 10TB in plain sight. I am a fan of SFF PC's.
  17. I'd be scared of heat build up during parity checks. interesting idea though.
  18. It should work fine. Just be careful to not knock the cable out. That could cause problems. I would also spend a few extra bucks to make sure the drive enclosure is a decent quality so you don't cook the drive under heavy loads. I have seen some cheap one do that. you could also buy a prebuilt external and it might cost less. like a WD or Seagate 2TB external with Esata. (although they seem to be getting rare with USB3 being the newest rage)
  19. there was no such deal in the US. I work very closely with HP at work since we are replacing all our "rackables" and supermicro servers with HP blade servers. they are out almost daily to the datacenter and i keep pointing out the UK deal. they keep saying they wish they could get one at that price in the states. they said best they can do is give me a G7 at about 1/3 off ..
  20. Trust Me. If I was in the UK, i'd have 4 of these.
  21. hrmm.. What is the differance in the new model and the old model besides the hard drive size? I almost got one a while back and now that the 160gig model is on sale... i might get it.
  22. +1 I knew about the pico power supply but i had not really given it much thought until you posted this. Now i am wondering if i can get one to work inside a chenbro mITX Pedistal Sever case or to mod one for a dell GX620 mini form factor. I have one of each with no power supply.
  23. Don't forget that if you do use the UIO card in a PCIe slot the heatsink and connectors will be on the "reverse" side. make sure you have room for that if it is not your "first card". Then the next question would be if we could get unraid to see an expander with that card. I have some LSI based expanders at work we are getting rid of along with the AOC-USA2-L8i cards. i could purchase those at the cost the recycling company would pay.
×
×
  • Create New...