Hoopster

Members
  • Posts

    4565
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    26

Posts posted by Hoopster

  1. 33 minutes ago, GFOviedo said:

    I know I want to stick with Intel since it is what I found to be the most reliable. I can't really decide on what to buy, and I really don't want to spend $$$ and later on find out that I ordered the wrong parts. For example, I am not sure if I will be able to continue using the ACO-SASLP-MV8 or will I have to upgrade this as well.

    The AOC-SASLP-MV8 is not recommended these days.  There is a long thread on recommeded controllers to use with Unraid.  I do not know how many total drives you plan to have, but fewer larger drives is generally better than many smaller drives.  Depending on how many drives you plan to have and how many SATA ports your MB has, you may or may not need a PCIe controllers.   I have a Dell H310 controller in IT mode in my Main server.  These days, I consider 8TB the smallest HDD I will purchase.

     

    I have three Unraid servers (see my signature for details) with an i5-11600 on the low end to a Xeon E-2288G on the high end.  However, depending on your Plex transcoding needs, an i3 may be sufficient.  Some are even doing fine with Pentium processors.

     

    Personally, I would look for a motherboard with a couple of M.2 slots as you can use these for cache/pool drives without requiring a SATA connection.

     

    If getting a new PSU, make sure it has a single 12V rail.

    • Like 1
  2. 16 minutes ago, vw-kombi said:

    What percentage of the world’s ‘home’ users would even know what ids/ips was.  That is on the USG also.  

    The Ubiquiti crowd knows what this is because performance was greatly decreased on the USG and UDR with these features turned on and there were many complaints.  Fortunately, the UXG-Lite has addressed that and it gets very close to 1Gb even with these turned on.  Thus, the claim of "up to 10x routing performance increase over the USG (tested with IPS/IDS, QoS, and Smart Queues)"

    • Like 1
  3. 8 minutes ago, vw-kombi said:

    USG-lite is what I would upgrade to also.  Very difficult to get in Australia.

    UXG-Lite was in and out of stock twice in the Ubiquiti US store before I finally got one on Monday on the third try (out of stock again later that night).  Fortunately, I live very close to one of their US warehouses so I got it delivered two days after ordering.

     

    It is in short supply everywhere. 

  4. 19 minutes ago, PeteAsking said:

    The very old devices are not supported by this version of the controller I am afraid. 

    The USG I just took out of service yesterday was running fine with the 8.0.24 version of this controller.  I replaced the USG with the new UXG-Lite which also has no buit-in controller.  It is working very well in this controller.

     

    The older (but not too old) Dream Router and the new UniFi Express both have a built-in controller and cannot be managed by this, or any other, controller container or cloud key.

  5. For those with the USG 3P gateway from Ubiquiti, the new replacement, the UXG-Lite, is finally in stock again at the Ubiquiti US store.  It has been hard to find in stock since release a month ago. UXG-Lite performs much better than the USG. 

     

    https://store.ui.com/us/en/pro/category/all-cloud-keys-gateways/products/uxg-lite

     

    There is also a new Unifi Express which also has the controller built-in as well but it is limited to managing four additional Unifi devices.

  6. 2 minutes ago, dopeytree said:

    Are you toggling turbo on / off?

    It is permanently off via Tips and Tweaks.

     

    image.png.0bdd2b609a1fbaf71cdcd80d067bdb86.png

     

    No on/off schedule.  With previous versions of Tips and Tweaks it was also off.  I had server crashing issues with certain processes with Turbo Boost on.  Has been off through several versions of Unraid.

     

  7. 1 hour ago, dopeytree said:

    Has anyone else got a system hang up when disabling turbo now in 6.12.6?

     

    There is also the power off issue where it hangs at the diagnostics screen. It has successfully unmounted all drives etc but you still have to manually hold the power button for the actual power off. No parity check on reboot.

    I have three servers running 6.12.6.  My main server has turbo boost disabled via the tips and tweaks plugin.  I have seen none of the problems with system hangs or power off issues that you describe.

    • Upvote 1
  8. 49 minutes ago, bmartino1 said:

    I entered this form due to no documentation and having to dig through this forum and 3 other websites and then be mini dev with others to help jumpstart. And reinforcing to inform from multiple sources.

    Personally, I thank you for that.  I will be using your documentation to migrate my current LSIO Unifi container to their new dual-container solution.  It will only be a backup to Unifi-Controller-Reborn for me, but at least you made some sense of it when all that existed before was a bit convoluted and seemed to be missing some important information.

     

    Anyone choosing to stick with the LSIO solution should be very grateful for you efforts.

    • Thanks 1
  9. 14 hours ago, mifronte said:

    Let's put it this way, if I was brand new to Unifi and looking for a way to run it on unRAID as a docker container, I would most likely opt for the one container vs the two containers solution.

    I have been running Unraid for 12 years and a Unifi network for six years.  I have used the LSIO versions of the Unifi Network Controller containers since I started with Unifi.  When it was announced the LSIO container would be split into two containers, I thought I'd give the single container solution from @PeteAsking a try.  It installed without a hitch and I am now running it with version 8.0.7 of the controller.  PeteAsking has been very active in this particular forum and knows his stuff when it comes to the Unifi infrastructure; however, I do understand the angst of a single maintainer vs. the resources of LSIO behind their solution.

     

    Personally, I plan to stick with the "controller-reborn" version.  As a backup, I will likely transition my currently inactive LSIO controller container to their new dual-container version but I personally prefer what PeteAsking has done.

    • Like 1
  10. 1 hour ago, BigDaddyDingDong said:

    Can someone please point me in the right direction?

    To further illustrate the point made by @ConnerVT here is a note from Plex regarding video transcoding with AMD GPUs:

     

    *Note: Our hardware-transcoding system has technical support for many dedicated AMD graphics cards, but we haven’t done official, full testing on those. Support for AMD GPUs is provided “as is” and your mileage may vary. It is recommended that you use Intel Quick Sync Video or a dedicated NVIDIA GPU.

  11. 1 minute ago, PeteAsking said:

    Probably the vpn is established on the unifi router so understandable it would not exist if you dont have one.
     

    I believe you cant use floor plan in the wifiman app if you dont have a unifi router so maybe this isnt the first time anyway. I wouldnt worry all that much about it. They are gimmicky features anyhow. 

    Yep.  The missing features on self-hosted controllers are of no concern to me now.  I just hope it does not become a trend with things I do want/need.

  12. 1 minute ago, PeteAsking said:

    What features are missing? Personally would never change from opnsense to an inferior firewall so unclear what features are removed you are alluding to. 

    Unifi Teleport VPN and Site Magic for this round.  This is the first time a Unifi self-hosted controller has not been equal to one running on Ubiquiti hardware or their cloud controller.

     

    "Teleport is a zero-configuration VPN that allows you to instantly connect to your UniFi network from a remote location. Users with a Next-Gen gateway or UniFi Cloud Gateway running UniFi OS can access it from Network Settings > Teleport & VPN."

     

    Here is a quote from a recent review of the UXG-Lite that expresses some concern for where this may be headed:

     

    It’s interesting these features are not supported on self-hosted UniFi Network application installs. It seems like an indication of where they are guiding their customers. The UniFi Network software has always been available for free, but this is the first time a feature line has been drawn between self-hosted and “officially” hosted. It’s possible that more features like this are added over time.

     

    Essentially, for a few of the newest and fanciest features, self-hosted controllers aren’t included. These limitations make some sense, but calling it out on the spec sheet makes it feel like a purposeful design choice and business decision. Maybe there is a technical challenge I’m not seeing, but it feels like a subtle way to encourage hardware sales. At best, it is disappointing. At worst, it’s a sign that self-hosted controllers are becoming second class citizens.

    • Like 1
  13. Just updated to this Unifi Network Controller container.  Installed it and restored 8.0.7 backup file with no issues noted so far.  Thank you.  An all-in-one container is much preferred to the split docker container path LSIO has implemented.

     

    Now the biggest question is how long Ubiquiti will support self-hosted controllers without severely limiting them.  They have taken the first step towards that with their latest hardware and controller releases.  It looks like they are going to start favoring their own hardware and cloud controller solutions for some advanced features and not supporting them with self-hosted controllers.  :(

     

    Now to wait for the new UXG-Lite to come back in stock at ui.com so I can replace my very old USG router/gateway. The new Unifi Express (built in network controller) is not an option because it supports a maximum of five connected Unifi devices (access points, switches, other Express units in a mesh configuration, etc.) and I currently am managing eight (plus USG) with this controller.

     

    NOTE: just learned the Unifi Express supports only four additional devices as the Express itself counts in the 5-device limit. 

  14. 2 hours ago, capt.shitface said:

    My hw-transcode has stopped working, i have tried the things in this post. 

     

    11th Gen Intel® Core™ i5-11600K

    Are you aware of this known issue with Unraid 6.12.x releases? Since hardware transcoding uses the i915 driver, perhaps this will help.  I had to do this on my server with an i5 11600 CPU to stabilize the i915 drivers. 

     

    In short, 11th gen Intel CPUs have issues with low power settings with recent Linux kernels.  This change disables the low power mode on the 11th gen. CPUs.

     

    Known issues

    Crashes related to i915 driver We are aware that some 11th gen Intel Rocket Lake systems are experiencing crashes related to the i915 iGPU.

     

    If your Rocket Lake system crashes under Unraid 6.12.0, open a web terminal and type this, then reboot: echo "options i915 enable_dc=0" >> /boot/config/modprobe.d/i915.conf

     

    Setting this option may result in higher power use but it may resolve this issue for these GPUs.

     

     

  15. 17 minutes ago, Mattaton said:

    Ah man. That's awesome, but a shame they aren't available any longer. Any suggestions on alternatives?

    You might find them on eBay. 

     

    Also, there is an older thread in these forums on card readers that have a unique GUID and work with Unraid.  I will link it when I find it but I am headed out the door right now for a few hours.

    • Like 1
  16. On 11/26/2023 at 12:18 PM, Mattaton said:

    there any truth or evidence to the claims where people have used SD cards in USB readers/adapters or SSDs connected with USB cables? Supposedly unRAID pulls the ID of the reader or SSD holder/connector and registers that which then allows the user to swap the SD card or SSD if it goes bad. So as long as the reader or holder/connector is good, then unRAID is "happy."

    If this indeed works, it sure takes a lot of the headache out of swapping flash drives. Just pop out the bad SD card, restore to a new one and you're good to go.

    This is exactly what I do.  Two of my three Unraid servers use Kingston Mobilite G2 or G3 (no longer available) card readers for the Unraid flash drive.  I use the other slot in the card reader for the syslog.  Been using these readers for 10+ years with no issues.

  17. 51 minutes ago, Red_Stag said:

    I have a "user0" which seems to be replicate of "user".

     It is normal to have a User and User0 folder. User0 is the same view as User but leaves out the cache/pool drives.  User0 is mainly for internal Unraid use.

     

    If you provide more details about your issues with Unraid and the diagnostics (might want to start a separate thread for that), some of the experts here may be able to give you some pointers to get you headed in the right direction.