sonic6
-
Posts
610 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Store
Gallery
Bug Reports
Documentation
Landing
Report Comments posted by sonic6
-
-
Changed Status to Open
-
thank you @Squid.
so that thread can be closed?
-
7 minutes ago, Squid said:
Why would you want to have a container path that isn't mapped to a host path?
I didn't "want" it empty. It was like I load that template from the CA and I don't have any reasons using that path at the moment. I didn't recognize that before, because the container was builded with that empty path on later unraid version.
9 minutes ago, Squid said:Docker silently failed on .6 as it wouldn't create any container path. Now they're calling it an error instead of silently failing.
Okay thank you for explaining me that case.
9 minutes ago, JonathanM said:What happens if you properly fill out the export path?
The same, like I did (deleting that path): it will work.
9 minutes ago, JonathanM said:I don't think 6.12.6 would have accepted it either.
I has... Like squid said before.
I reported it, because I think I will not the last one who runs into that "problem"
Just wanna try to help.
-
Changed Status to Solved
-
@JorgeB thanks for your response. i will change the status to solved and hope that will be fixed in a futur update.
-
Any news on this? Am i to stupid for a automated Parity-Check, or is this a Bug?
-
2 minutes ago, itimpi said:
That would be expected if you have uninstalled the plugin as mentioned earlier?
yes, like i said here:
On 1/2/2024 at 11:04 AM, sonic6 said: -
6 minutes ago, itimpi said:
If you have the Dynamix File Manager plugin installed then you can navigate to the plugins folder on the flash drive /boot/config/plugins/parity.check.tuning/ to get a file listing.
okay, there any files:
root@Unraid-1:~# ls -la /boot/config/plugins/parity.check.tuning/ /bin/ls: cannot access '/boot/config/plugins/parity.check.tuning/': No such file or directory
-
Any news on this? Problem is still present.
-
22 hours ago, itimpi said:
It might be useful if a listing of the files that are there could be given as that could provide a clue as to what that might be. In addition the contents of any "progress" type files that are there.
what is the recommendes way to do this?
-
5 hours ago, itimpi said:
The Parity Check Tuning plugin would not have initiated the check.
I said the same.
4 hours ago, itimpi said:While I think of it we normally recommended that scheduled parity checks are set to be non-correcting.
Fine, but when I choose a correction for m schedule, than it should do that.
On my last test from 11:00 the parity check tuning plugin wasn't installed.
-
50 minutes ago, ChatNoir said:
Have you tried without the plugin to ensure that it is indeed an Unraid issue ?
i tried this again at 11:00 without the plugin:
Jan 2 11:00:02 Unraid-1 kernel: mdcmd (69): check NOCORRECT Jan 2 11:00:02 Unraid-1 kernel: Jan 2 11:00:02 Unraid-1 kernel: md: recovery thread: check P ...Diagnostic is attached.
-
6 minutes ago, ChatNoir said:
Parity check tuning is a third party plugin, not part of base Unraid.
i know, but the parity check was triggert by the default unraid parity check schedule and this :
Jan 2 00:00:07 Unraid-1 kernel: mdcmd (62): check NOCORRECT Jan 2 00:00:07 Unraid-1 kernel: Jan 2 00:00:07 Unraid-1 kernel: md: recovery thread: check P ...isn't a part of parity-check tuning
6 minutes ago, ChatNoir said:Have you tried without the plugin to ensure that it is indeed an Unraid issue ?
no, not yet.
-
for all, who are looking for a fix, here it is:
-
4
-
-
1 hour ago, Mainfrezzer said:
So far its been looking very good. 👍
The Webterminal does work again on mobile (android 13, chrome) but clicking the syslog shortcut still breaks everything.
And while im at the syslog, this is certainly new in .12.4
this keeps on going for a while. seems to have started after the 24h dc.i think this is because of the changing ipv6 prefix. fe80 prefixes changes in germany after DC's
so this isn't usable for a static route?
@bonienl can you take a look into that?-
1
-
-
6 minutes ago, bonienl said:
How many containers do you have?
41 Containers are running.
I did't change the count on containers in the last weeks. -
The Docker Area in Dashboard is very slow with 6.12.4RC18 . Doesn't matter if you using the folderview plugin or not. @alturismo got the same.
-
1
-
-
7 minutes ago, bonienl said:
I like to doublecheck.
Can you post the result of (mask your public IPv6 address as needed)
ip -6 addr show eth0
-
1
-
1
-
-
1 hour ago, snowy00 said:
I Checked my router after the update an currently I have to devices with the same IP address that assigned to the Unraid Server,
Are the containers still working in bridge mode?
It seems Unraid eth0 interface has to MAC addresses --> I use a static IP for may Unraid Server.
Ist that the Problem?
this is normal and was the same with the old method.
go into your unraid web terminal and type "ip address".
then look for search for MAC-Adresses which are same like your router list with your unraid-server ip addresses
should be look like this:
-
1
-
-
i am not sure, but i think the routing tablet isn't correct for vhost?
fd00:: is my ULA which is needed for peristant hostname resolving.
2003:c0:xxxx:xxxx:: is the prefix from my provider, which is changing from time to time. so i can't use that addresses in my local DNS for local hostname resolving.
-
LIBVIRT ERROR: VIRNETSOCKETREADWIRE ist still present:
-
13 minutes ago, ljm42 said:
Having said that, I think the recommendations here are valid until we have something better:
https://docs.unraid.net/unraid-os/release-notes/6.12.0/#known-issues
okay, i have to say sorry, because just meant this "solution":
and you are also right, there aren't diagnostic from 6.12.3 ... there aren't any diagnostics. But also hard to post, when the server crashed
12 minutes ago, ljm42 said:Side note - one thing I keep meaning to ask folks is does your ISP *require* you to use the Fritzbox or are you allowed to replace it? In the US, ISPs give you a pretty bare bones router but you are usually allowed to replace it if you want more functionality. Not sure if it works that way everywhere or not.
In germany we normaly can free use our routers, but the Fritzbox is on of the best choise for normal consumers like 99% of the people. (there are a small amount of ISP that gives you a router for their fiberline connections, that you have to use. in most cases this is a Fritzbox.)
-
10 hours ago, ljm42 said:
Currently our best advice is documented in the known issues for 6.12.0:
https://docs.unraid.net/unraid-os/release-notes/6.12.0#known-issues
why is this still recommended? if you take a look in this thread, there are more and more user, who is using this "solution", but got Traces.
This just confuses more and more users, who's looking for help.
-
Sorry, but i have to reopen this Issue.
I use binhex-kruser for this example:
When "Permit exclusive shares" and mount /mnt/user/ into a container i have the same "problem" like @Anym001.
But when i mount /mn/ i can access /mnt/user/ from there without problems.
What are the differences?
[6.12.6] Parity Check (tuning) schedule won't do correction
in Stable Releases
Posted
Bug is still present on 6.12.9