Helmonder

I understand the point, but there are a couple of reasons why I'm holding back on this. - It wouldn't be any easier to set up than it is to set up OpenVPN and peter_sm has two OpenVPN plugins to make it as easy as possible. - I don't consider myself a security expert. Even OpenVPN (which is made by people definitely more knowledgeable than me in these matters) has security advisories as recent as Sep 12th. Which leads me to the last reason I'd like to bring up and it's a matter of liability. - Let's say this gets done and users can access their server over the internet, but then someone exploits a bug/flaw in the plugin (which would be required to make this work), a server is compromised and maybe there's data loss. I really don't want to be involved in such a scenario. To be honest, security is not an easy matter Personally I use pushbullet for push notifications towards my smartphone, that way if anything bad happens pushbullet notifies me, I then log in to the system using vpn... Works fine..

I am amazed by this tool.. It is extremely usefull.and seems to incorporate everything I need on the go.. Really nice !

That probably explains my problems too. Confirmed.. also my issue... I also found a workaround: start a parity check and then add the server... Worked on first try !

ok, so wait for a new version ? Will take apple some time I guess ?

Helmonder, try one thing .. set manual timeout to 0, then add it manually. If that doesn't work, I'll pm to go a bit deeper into the issue. Thanks for your response ! I just tried this and the behaviour is the same, the wheel keeps on running and nothing happens.. Been looking at it for a minute now..

jbrodriguez, I still cannot add my main unraid server... Not automatic and not manual... What should I do ?

Nice! Really good looking app. For some reason however it refuses to add my main unraid server. My backup server is on the same network and gets found easily. I also cannot add the main server manually.. Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk

Still working... Did not change anything.. Have you logged recently into crashplan vnc? Are you backing up to crashplan servers? Did you make any modification to the standard docker installation? Thankyou Gus Yes No to my own backup server No, only the memory increase for the java stack heap

Still working... Did not change anything..

Now running two 8tb preclears on my main and testrig (one on each), the preclear seems to work fine. It would be nice if there were some kind of identifier wrt the name or ip of the server in the launched window, with two servers on the network its not visible which window is for which unraid system..

I just upgraded unraid to the latest beta on my backup server, after that a docker update for crashplan came available, i updated it and after that crashplan updated itself to 4.7.. Everything is working fine again !

Mmm.. I have two crashplan instances running on two unraid servers.. The one on my main unraid server has updated to 4.7, the one running on the secundary backup server is giving errors trying to upgrade for a few days.. The only difference between the two systems is that the primary server (where crashplan updated to 4.7) is running the latest unraid beta, the backup system is running the latest stable release .. I have tried restarting the docker on the backup unraid server, but that does not make a difference.

You probably tried to quickly.. After starting the docker it takes a few minutes to initialise and make the webui visible..

I had this issue.. it dissapeared when i removed kaspersky from my system... So at least it was virusscanner related..

Doesn't the log tell you what is going wrong ? It is stating there is not enough diskspace available.. Should mean your ramdisk is to small... Just make it bigger..

my install appears flawless.. i also updated to the latest version..

Sorry, I guess I misinterpreted the ambiguous comment . Can confirm my blackscreen VNC has been fixed, thank you. Highlights the major flaw with having a single user providing dockers. If the docker system allowed a rollback, or ability to choose a previous build, this wouldn't be an issue. (You could rebut this and say build your own, but I'd digress) I do at least agree that I am starting to realise that it might be something of a risk having my precious backups in hands of a company that might decide to stop supporting us and/or in a docker system where I am reliant on one maintainer... And this has -NOTHING- to do with enormous amount of great work gfjardim is doing on this... I really do appreciate that enormously.. Its just... my backups.. I haven't decided on anything but maybe an rsync solution is "safer" in that respect..

Gfjardim: you are great! Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk

I just was in contact with their support and they confirmed that the issue is with the Crashplan version, not with the underlying os. So as long as the Docker supporter gets 4.7 to work in Docker we will be fine.. I still think it is kind of weird that they do it this way so I will continue to be somewhat #worried untill I see it solved.. I can imagine that, especially in combination with their cloud offering, they do not particularly like the fact that we have made it so easy to run this on a NAS.. Makes it really easy to send terrabytes upon terrabytes to their cloud.. That used to be a lot more involved (yet not impossible)

Right.... Thats easy then :-). Either the docker gets changed towards the new version or I loose my backups.. Verzonden vanaf mijn iPhone met Tapatalk

Well.. unless I totally misunderstand the way the Dockers work they are certainly not running ubuntu.. I also received the mail and it does worry me a lot.. For some reason Crashplan think we are using a version that will no longer be supported.. The same thing they use to identify the people who get the mail might be used to "block" certain users... The supported linux list says: Linux using: Kernel version 2.6.32 or later and glibc version 2.9 or later Supported The linux kernel version can be seen at bootup: Linux Tower 4.4.6-unRAID #1 SMP PREEMPT Fri Mar 25 21:34:35 PDT 2016 x86_64 Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E31230 @ 3.20GHz GenuineIntel GNU/Linux So that looks fine. GLIBC: I googled this (without knowing what it is), you should be able to assess its version by typing ldd --version. This comes back with 2.23. So that looks like above 2.9.. So still worried about why the mail was received..

You need to do the following in youyr plex VM: sudo mkdir /mnt/RAM_disk then edit fstab: sudo vi /etc/fstab add the following line as last line (scroll down and to the right, press A, press ENTER): tmpfs /mnt/RAM_disk tmpfs rw,size=2G,comment=x-gvfs-show 0 0 then close and save (ESC, ":", wq <ENTER>) (2G stands for 2gigs, if you need 1, make it 1G) then reload fstab: sudo mount -a <ENTER> Now go into plex, and change the temporary transcode directory (settings, server, transcoder).

Done and works !

CrashPlan is still in 4.6.0 but keeps trying to update. I've released an update that will disable the autoupdate until a new version is released. So we should install the docker update. I'll do so now.

There is a docker update right now.. Should we install ?