Jump to content

xfs error, disk bad file system


Recommended Posts

I don't understand. How it can help me ? I don't have parity drive. It just array with 3 disk. I need repair my file system and data on disk 2. I have 4 VM on it disk. In that thread need format disk. I don't want format and lose my data in 4 VM

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Exlife said:

I don't understand. How it can help me ? I don't have parity drive. It just array with 3 disk. I need repair my file system and data on disk 2. I have 4 VM on it disk. In that thread need format disk. I don't want format and lose my data in 4 VM

I would suggest that you click on the drive and explicitly set the format to be xfs.   This should then allow you to a file system repair via the GUI.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, Yankton said:

Some good info to go through here.

Not sure why you posted in this thread as your issue seems to have nothing to do with the thread title.

 

If you have put the new disk into a new slot on the array, then after starting the array it will need formatting.    If your problem is anything else you should start a new thread about it.

Link to comment
1 hour ago, JorgeB said:

Without parity you cannot do the usual solution, which is to rebuild to recreate the correct partition layout, see if the device mounts with UD.

 

I can only format

30 minutes ago, itimpi said:

I would suggest that you click on the drive and explicitly set the format to be xfs.   This should then allow you to a file system repair via the GUI.

It still Unsupported partition layout 

 

27 minutes ago, itimpi said:

Not sure why you posted in this thread as your issue seems to have nothing to do with the thread title.

 

If you have put the new disk into a new slot on the array, then after starting the array it will need formatting.    If your problem is anything else you should start a new thread about it.

Maby i bad can tell on English. 

I have array wothout parity. It just disk1 disk2 disk3. I don't add new disk2. My disk2 lose my file system after  VM on it disk froze(stuck,halt). I wanna back 4 VM

 

xfs_repair status: 

Spoiler
Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
Phase 2 - using internal log
        - zero log...
ALERT: The filesystem has valuable metadata changes in a log which is being
ignored because the -n option was used.  Expect spurious inconsistencies
which may be resolved by first mounting the filesystem to replay the log.
        - scan filesystem freespace and inode maps...
sb_icount 1920, counted 1856
sb_ifree 533, counted 478
sb_fdblocks 59246843, counted 71799196
        - found root inode chunk
Phase 3 - for each AG...
        - scan (but don't clear) agi unlinked lists...
        - process known inodes and perform inode discovery...
        - agno = 0
        - agno = 1
        - agno = 2
out-of-order bmap key (file offset) in inode 537359427, data fork, fsbno 79635562
bad data fork in inode 537359427
would have cleared inode 537359427
        - agno = 3
        - process newly discovered inodes...
Phase 4 - check for duplicate blocks...
        - setting up duplicate extent list...
        - check for inodes claiming duplicate blocks...
        - agno = 1
        - agno = 3
        - agno = 0
        - agno = 2
entry "macos_disk.img" in shortform directory 537359424 references free inode 537359427
would have junked entry "macos_disk.img" in directory inode 537359424
out-of-order bmap key (file offset) in inode 537359427, data fork, fsbno 79635562
would have cleared inode 537359427
Missing reference count record for (2/12224889) len 48 count 2
xfs_repair: rmap.c:1267: fix_inode_reflink_flags: Assertion `(irec->ino_is_rl & irec->ir_free) == 0' failed.
Missing reference count record for (2/12391962) len 112 count 2
Missing reference count record for (2/12476730) len 256 count 2
Missing reference count record for (2/12477210) len 5200 count 2
Missing reference count record for (2/12483690) len 896 count 2
Missing reference count record for (2/12485834) len 40864 count 2
Missing reference count record for (2/12526699) len 2976 count 2

 

xfs_repair status: 

It can see file with one of my VM. I think it good

Edited by Exlife
Link to comment
5 minutes ago, Exlife said:

I can only format

31 minutes ago, itimpi said:

I would suggest that you click on the drive and explicitly set the format to be xfs.   This should then allow you to a file system repair via the GUI.

It still Unsupported partition layout 

If you change the format to explicitly be xfs and then reboot, when you click on the drive you should have the check filesystem option.   This is the way to clear the unmountable status.

Link to comment
22 minutes ago, JorgeB said:

That means no valid fs is being detected, post output of

blkid

and

fdisk -l /dev/nvme0n1

 

Spoiler

root@Tower2:~# blkid
/dev/sda1: LABEL_FATBOOT="UNRAID" LABEL="UNRAID" UUID="272B-4CE1" BLOCK_SIZE="512" TYPE="vfat"
/dev/loop1: TYPE="squashfs"
/dev/sdb1: UUID="836a2078-1eb6-4765-8e54-bddabf3be7f5" BLOCK_SIZE="512" TYPE="xfs" PARTUUID="e33d5dab-01"
/dev/md2: UUID="a8c2b643-0e7d-4dc7-ab94-b619d1e032d2" BLOCK_SIZE="512" TYPE="xfs"
/dev/loop0: TYPE="squashfs"
/dev/sdc1: UUID="da98a68e-1703-400c-a7f9-6697ac36083a" BLOCK_SIZE="512" TYPE="xfs"
/dev/md3: UUID="836a2078-1eb6-4765-8e54-bddabf3be7f5" BLOCK_SIZE="512" TYPE="xfs"
/dev/md1: UUID="da98a68e-1703-400c-a7f9-6697ac36083a" BLOCK_SIZE="512" TYPE="xfs"
root@Tower2:~# fdisk -l /dev/nvme0n1
Disk /dev/nvme0n1: 476.94 GiB, 512110190592 bytes, 1000215216 sectors
Disk model: ADATA SX6000LNP                         
Units: sectors of 1 * 512 = 512 bytes
Sector size (logical/physical): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
I/O size (minimum/optimal): 512 bytes / 512 bytes
root@Tower2:~# 

 

25 minutes ago, itimpi said:

If you change the format to explicitly be xfs and then reboot, when you click on the drive you should have the check filesystem option.   This is the way to clear the unmountable status.

Ok. now i read more for it utility. I try keys -n and -nv

i get only it

Spoiler
Quote
Phase 1 - find and verify superblock...
        - block cache size set to 2301864 entries
Phase 2 - using internal log
        - zero log...
zero_log: head block 397311 tail block 397061
ALERT: The filesystem has valuable metadata changes in a log which is being
ignored because the -n option was used.  Expect spurious inconsistencies
which may be resolved by first mounting the filesystem to replay the log.
        - scan filesystem freespace and inode maps...
sb_icount 1920, counted 1856
sb_ifree 533, counted 478
sb_fdblocks 59246843, counted 71799196
        - found root inode chunk
Phase 3 - for each AG...
        - scan (but don't clear) agi unlinked lists...
        - process known inodes and perform inode discovery...
        - agno = 0
        - agno = 1
        - agno = 2
out-of-order bmap key (file offset) in inode 537359427, data fork, fsbno 79635562
bad data fork in inode 537359427
would have cleared inode 537359427
        - agno = 3
        - process newly discovered inodes...
Phase 4 - check for duplicate blocks...
        - setting up duplicate extent list...
        - check for inodes claiming duplicate blocks...
        - agno = 0
        - agno = 2
        - agno = 3
        - agno = 1
entry "macos_disk.img" in shortform directory 537359424 references free inode 537359427
would have junked entry "macos_disk.img" in directory inode 537359424
out-of-order bmap key (file offset) in inode 537359427, data fork, fsbno 79635562
would have cleared inode 537359427
xfs_repair: rmap.c:1267: fix_inode_reflink_flags: Assertion `(irec->ino_is_rl & irec->ir_free) == 0' failed.
Missing reference count record for (2/12224889) len 48 count 2
Missing reference count record for (2/12391962) len 112 count 2
Missing reference count record for (2/12476730) len 256 count 2
Missing reference count record for (2/12477210) len 5200 count 2
Missing reference count record for (2/12483690) len 896 count 2
Missing reference count record for (2/12485834) len 40864 count 2
Missing reference count record for (2/12526699) len 2976 count 2

 

 

 

Edited by Exlife
Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
×
  • Create New...