Are These Servers a Good Deal?


Recommended Posts

My server is an even older Tams unit, and it has handled both 2 and 4Tb drives just fine.  FWIW

 

And to underscore StevenD's comment regarding sound, DO NOT underestimate how loud a real server can be.  You may be thinking 'desktop' 'I can really hear a fan' levels.  Not even close.  Imagine a hair dryer on high.  Loud enough that you can't easily have a conversation beside it.  There are workarounds, though.  See here: http://www.avsforum.com/forum/26-home-theater-computers/1412640-you-looking-less-expensive-norco-4220-4224-alternative.html

 

All that being said, this should be an awesome unRAID server.  My only concern would be the lack of IPMI card, but that board should have 2 network ports, one of which, could probably be dedicated to the task.  There's NOTHING like having a dedicated link to your machine that works even while the machine is off/at CMOS/booting/etc.

 

As for power hungry- dunno.  I think mine can draw upwards of 250w, but it is fully loaded.

Link to comment

Yep, these will work great.  I bought a similar one earlier this week after extensive research.

 

The PSU that comes with yours is insanely loud.  They're not power-efficiency rated.  You'll be better off with a Gold or Platinum rated PSU.  And you really only need 1 quieter PSU (instead of 2 insanely loud ones) for home use, since I doubt many of us care about redundant PSUs.

 

The one you linked (with the TQ backplane) may require up to 3 controller cards (or some other way to get 24 individual SATA ports), but will have the highest overall performance (each drive gets a fully dedicated SATA link).  Those controller cards are pretty power hungry too.  IMO, the better option for bulk storage has the SAS2 backplane (server model SC846E16, or a listing that specifies a SAS2 backplane) with a port expander.  The SAS2 option only requires 1 controller card.  If it doesn't come with one, best option for controller is an m1015 (or similar) flashed to IT mode (<$100).

 

With the SAS2 expander, you'll get aggregate 2400MB/sec throughput to your drives (so 100MB/sec simultaneous reads on all 24 drives for parity checks, or faster per drive on fewer drives).  I think most people's parity checks are limited around that speed anyway, and that limit won't apply to e.g. standard single file reads - bandwidth is dynamically shared.  Another advantage -- one single cable going from the controller to the backplane.  The TQ model has 24 individual cables.

 

IMO, this with a quieter gold-rated PSU or this + this MUCH quieter platinum-rated PSU are better than the linked option.  They'll require sourcing a few additional components (CPU + RAM) yourself though

 

Xeon L5630 (2 for $40) or L5640 (2 for <$100) are good options for CPU with slightly lower power consumption.  6x4GB = 24GB ECC DDR3 registered RAM for $50 on ebay.

 

The options I linked also have integrated IPMI on the motherboards

Link to comment

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Restore formatting

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.