Blade Posted June 15, 2018 Share Posted June 15, 2018 I am getting this trying to update my one unraid server from 6.5.0 The others update just fine plugin: updating: unRAIDServer.plgplugin: downloading: https://s3.amazonaws.com/dnld.lime-technology.com/stable/unRAIDServer-6.5.3-x86_64.zip ... doneplugin: downloading: https://s3.amazonaws.com/dnld.lime-technology.com/stable/unRAIDServer-6.5.3-x86_64.md5 ... doneArchive: /tmp/unRAIDServer.zipcreating: /tmp/unRAIDServer/EFI-/creating: /tmp/unRAIDServer/EFI-/boot/inflating: /tmp/unRAIDServer/EFI-/boot/bootx64.efi inflating: /tmp/unRAIDServer/EFI-/boot/ldlinux.e64 inflating: /tmp/unRAIDServer/EFI-/boot/libcom32.c32 inflating: /tmp/unRAIDServer/EFI-/boot/libutil.c32 inflating: /tmp/unRAIDServer/EFI-/boot/mboot.c32 inflating: /tmp/unRAIDServer/EFI-/boot/menu.c32 inflating: /tmp/unRAIDServer/EFI-/boot/syslinux.cfg inflating: /tmp/unRAIDServer/bzfirmware inflating: /tmp/unRAIDServer/bzimage inflating: /tmp/unRAIDServer/bzmodules inflating: /tmp/unRAIDServer/bzroot unzip error 0plugin: run failed: /bin/bash retval: 1 Here is some syslog info Jun 15 15:31:25 Tower2 emhttpd: req (4): cmd=/plugins/dynamix.plugin.manager/scripts/plugin&arg1=update&arg2=unRAIDServer.plg&csrf_token=**************** Jun 15 15:31:25 Tower2 emhttpd: cmd: /usr/local/emhttp/plugins/dynamix.plugin.manager/scripts/plugin update unRAIDServer.plg Jun 15 15:31:25 Tower2 root: plugin: creating: /tmp/unRAIDServer.sh - from INLINE content Jun 15 15:31:25 Tower2 root: plugin: running: /tmp/unRAIDServer.sh Jun 15 15:31:25 Tower2 root: plugin: creating: /tmp/unRAIDServer.zip - downloading from URL https://s3.amazonaws.com/dnld.lime-technology.com/stable/unRAIDServer-6.5.3-x86_64.zip Jun 15 15:32:48 Tower2 root: plugin: creating: /tmp/unRAIDServer.md5 - downloading from URL https://s3.amazonaws.com/dnld.lime-technology.com/stable/unRAIDServer-6.5.3-x86_64.md5 Jun 15 15:32:49 Tower2 root: plugin: creating: /tmp/unRAIDServer.sh - from INLINE content Jun 15 15:32:49 Tower2 root: plugin: running: /tmp/unRAIDServer.sh Jun 15 15:33:22 Tower2 emhttpd: req (5): cmd=/plugins/dynamix.plugin.manager/scripts/plugin&arg1=checkos&csrf_token=**************** Jun 15 15:33:22 Tower2 emhttpd: cmd: /usr/local/emhttp/plugins/dynamix.plugin.manager/scripts/plugin checkos Jun 15 15:34:01 Tower2 crond[1489]: exit status 2 from user root /usr/local/emhttp/plugins/dynamix.system.stats/scripts/sa1 1 1 &> /dev/null Jun 15 15:35:01 Tower2 crond[1489]: exit status 2 from user root /usr/local/emhttp/plugins/dynamix.system.stats/scripts/sa1 1 1 &> /dev/null Link to comment
Squid Posted June 15, 2018 Share Posted June 15, 2018 How much memory does your server have? Link to comment
Blade Posted June 15, 2018 Author Share Posted June 15, 2018 root@Tower2:/boot# free -m total used free shared buff/cache available Mem: 1747 78 823 832 845 699 Swap: 0 0 0 Link to comment
Blade Posted June 15, 2018 Author Share Posted June 15, 2018 Looks like my root disk is full Can I make it bigger? My other tower rootfs is 1.8Gb Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on rootfs 831M 831M 8.0K 100% / tmpfs 32M 500K 32M 2% /run devtmpfs 831M 0 831M 0% /dev tmpfs 874M 0 874M 0% /dev/shm cgroup_root 8.0M 0 8.0M 0% /sys/fs/cgroup tmpfs 128M 528K 128M 1% /var/log /dev/sda1 3.8G 164M 3.6G 5% /boot /dev/loop0 7.5M 7.5M 0 100% /lib/modules /dev/loop1 4.5M 4.5M 0 100% /lib/firmware Link to comment
JonathanM Posted June 15, 2018 Share Posted June 15, 2018 1 hour ago, Blade said: Looks like my root disk is full Can I make it bigger? Add RAM. Link to comment
Blade Posted June 16, 2018 Author Share Posted June 16, 2018 I have the same RAM in my other tower and it is just fine Why would this one be different Link to comment
pwm Posted June 16, 2018 Share Posted June 16, 2018 24 minutes ago, Blade said: I have the same RAM in my other tower and it is just fine Why would this one be different From the command line you can do du -x / | sort -n This will indicate what is filling the root file system. -x informs that du should ignore other file systems mounted. You'll see a mix of sizes for specific files and summaries for directory trees. Link to comment
Blade Posted June 16, 2018 Author Share Posted June 16, 2018 Here is the output du.txt Link to comment
pwm Posted June 16, 2018 Share Posted June 16, 2018 Seems normal. The only thing I see you could potentially do something about is if you don't run the Dynamix System Statistics plugin. It is creating the files in /var/sa/ and it consumes 168 MB of the RAM. But as @jonathanm notes - the recommended action is to consider more RAM. The more RAM you have, the larger the rootfs will be. One of my unRAID machines has 16 GB RAM and has allocated 8 GB to the rootfs. I'm not sure about the actual policy used by unRAID when deciding the size of the rootfs. Link to comment
Blade Posted June 17, 2018 Author Share Posted June 17, 2018 Thanks I appreciate the info Looks like more memory it is Link to comment
pgnyc Posted June 19, 2018 Share Posted June 19, 2018 hello, i had the same pb yesterday, trying to go from 6.3.2 to 6.5.3. i have the same rootfs size : 867M used 700M. After tracking the pb to not enough space in /tmp for download and unzip. my solution was to move /tmp to /boot because i have 7G available there ( i know i was using the usb stick for that) [do not copy, if you do not understand] mv /tmp to /tmpori (rename tmp) ln -s /tmp /boot/tmp (create a link from /tmp to /boot/tmp) mkdir /boot/tmp tested by touch /tmp/toto , ls -l /boot/tmp , ok the file toto is present cp -R * /tmpori /tmp ( recopy old tmp to new tmp) and there upgrade , everything went fine , reboot , OK , restart array , OK. My new rootfs is : rootfs 867M 703M 165M 81% / i think i will have to do the same for each upgrade, since i have only 2G memory and no pb for a file server only purpose. Link to comment
JonathanM Posted June 19, 2018 Share Posted June 19, 2018 19 minutes ago, pgnyc said: my solution was to move /tmp to /boot because i have 7G available there ( i know i was using the usb stick for that) Instead of using the USB flash with your license attached, you would be MUCH better off mapping to a cache drive, unassigned devices drive, or array drive, in that order. Putting that much wear on your USB is not a good idea. Link to comment
pgnyc Posted June 19, 2018 Share Posted June 19, 2018 yes you are right , i could have use a unassigned devices drive , but since i was using a terminal screen , i did not think about it , was not on a df listing !!! same using an array disk !!! next time !! in fact , the biggest pb is everything works so well, that you do not touch and forget . Pascal Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.