Flubster

in Authelia you can specify a "database_index" in the configuration.yml which tells redis to use a different database therefore avoiding clashes. in Authentik this is AUTHENTIK_REDIS__DB in the docker params.

I use rclone with a onedrive endpoint to do exactly this.

Actually this appears to be a plugin for the homebridge docker therefore I'm not sure there is even a docker image to pull. Do you have a homebridge docker installed? https://github.com/homebridge/homebridge/wiki/Install-Homebridge-on-Docker Rrb

I'm not 100% sure but I think the default repository is dockerhub, therefore on the repository you need to prefix ghcr.io domain so it pulls from there Rbb

https://info.linuxserver.io/issues/2024-05-12-nzbget/

Hi, Can someone sanity check what i'm doing please. I have a totally brand spanking new server, with brand new drives. I am therefore needing to decommission the old server and migrate data to the new box. Rightly or wrongly, i've turned off the old server, and have manually mounted each of the old drives (using UD in RO mode!!!) and coping the data directly using rsync -avzP (in a screen session) direct to the disk share rather than using fuse (to remove the overhead) - i've broken parity while this occurs, I'll then readd the parity drive to rebuild parity once copy is complete. This has recreated the share scheme on the new server (I wanted to start from scratch so haven't used the existing USB) server is on trial license atm. But none of the unraid existing share permissions are applied (other than linux perms) When the data is fully copied - any reason why I can't stop new server, copy the existing Pro.key to /config and copy all /config/shares/ over to the new stick, thus setting the shares as they were before (users are identical as only one user), and allowing me to use the automated replace USB stick key regeneration? I need to manually recreate dockers etc (which is fine) Sound like i'm making sense? Am I doing anything that strikes you as bad?

How are you accessing the Login URL? Via Reverse proxy? If so you'll need to create a new variable called PAPERLESS_URL and specify the domain / subdomain you are accessing from. For instance: PAPERLESS_URL=https://paperless.domain.com

its under advanced settings (change the slider from basic view) under "Extra Parameters"

extra params are in docker advanced in unraid. I think like yayitazale said, you need to concentrate on one part first. get the docker frigate container up, web interface working, GPU accel showing on web internface, then worry about mqtt / homeassistant reporting / alerts / integration next. Flub

@Lunch I had the same issue as you, but in my case (and I suspect this isn't the best solution although worked for me) I checked config had the hwaccel line I added "--gpus all" into extra parameters And removed nvidia_visible_devices key in the template. I do question whether i had tried --runtime=nvidia but in the end the above options worked for me so stopped there. (GPU now shows in frigate Web ui and smi) I needed to get frigate back up quick so didn't have time to experiment with parameters. YMMV etc. Flub.

interestingly the only error I get in my updated docker version is "gs-server: ===== UDP packets from Mediator not received, so connecting to this Server will be slow =====" (GoodSync (R) Ver 11.10.7.7 OS: Linux-Debian stretch/sid) Because I block the mediator at my firewall. Dave

They've moved maxmind into a docker mod. Not sure if it was previously configured and working if it'll stop working or not but https://github.com/linuxserver/docker-mods/tree/swag-maxmind Dave Edit: I also needed to cycle the docker twice to get it to download, first time "enabled" the mod, second time downloaded the database

I ordered one of these which arrived yesterday, which should allow both TPU to be seen via a single PCIe lane. When I can find time to remove the server from the rack and test I'll reply back Dave

Hi, (Unraid 6.9.2) I'm looking at the Wiki (link) for shrinking the array, and this doesn't mention anything about dual parity and if this actually matters. I have spent the last few months clearing down and moving data between disks to prepare to remove some drives with questionable SMART stats. I now have the overheads to remove these drives. I intend to use the rebuild parity method as I don't want to zero the 6 drives i'm removing. I assume I am ok to just follow the instructions, and it'll rebuild parity OK with dual parity assigned? Dave

I'm using unifi on my Frigate instance. What resolution have you set the rtsp to? I have detect pointing at one, and record set at a higher res cameras: front: ffmpeg: inputs: - path: rtsp://link (medium) roles: - detect - path: rtsp://link (High) roles: - record detect: width: 1024 height: 576 fps: 5

I have also seen this, I assumed it was me "faffing" with TS change ffmpeg options, then the reversion back. Luckily I've got frigate cache set to /dev/shm therefore it can never kill anything in the UnRAID GUI etc. Flubster

Also ich777's plugin has a page in settings that shows the detected TPU's IIRC (I can't check right now as I'm back to using USB until my Dual Edge TPU -> PCIe adaptor appears) Flubster

I've also noticed that the default recording format has changed so if you have explicit output_args defined you may want to review them (changed from mp4 to ts) Audio is now recording by default - the entire reason I had a output_args ffmpeg override anyway. RRB

try removing the password from the redis container. you've got it set to allow a blank password (ie no password) but then have a password set. Either set ALLOW_EMPTY_PASSWORD to no and specify the redis password in the paperless-ng config or blank the password in the REDIS container config Dave

I maybe being dense here, but the UnRAID GUI should not be accessible from the internet anyway so what benefit would this have? Services should be behind reverse proxies - and using SWAG / NPM (I personally use SWAG but assume its in NPM) fail2ban is implemented, as well as geoip database lookups to block country subnets etc.

Select advanced in the docker config and check you don't have -rm in any of the parameter settings Dave

Fyi I've got a usb coral plugged into the back of my HP server which I'm reasonably sure is USB2.0 and I do indeed get a LED lit with a frigate docker. My inference speed is around 37 in debug which i have no idea is good or not! Dave

Not sure if the UDMP is different from my USG but i didn't need additional WANIN rules other than the default port forward rules, (the 3000 rules) Try disabling them for a start. See if that gets you anywhere. I did have some very bizzare issues with VLANS and the USG so it can be very frustrating, it forced me to setup a syslog server just to get the firewall detailed logs to fix the issues. Flub

So, Over the last few months i've been gradually retiring some old 2gb SAS drives (with escalating "Elements in grown defect list" errors) and replacing with some SATA 4Gb's. As I run dual parity I could now retire my second shelf if I moved the drives into the spare bays in the server / shelf 1. (I've been using the zero method after clearing the data from the erroring drives - then removing when cleared) From what I understand UnRAID doesn't care where the drives are physically - they are tracked by serial - so can someone confirm if I fill the redundant bays with the drives from/ shelf 2, and with screenshots ensure they are allocated the same position within UnRAID (this should be automatic) dual Parity will be maintained - the sda/sdb linux moniker is not relevent? It may annoy my OCD that drive25 maybe in bay 3 in my server and not bay 1 shelf 2, but I use "Disk Location" plugin so can track where drives are. Is my thinking correct - I could do with removing shelf 2, if only to give my UPS a bit more headroom, and reduce some heat before we hit the 2 weeks of summer the UK has! Flubster

I've got a 2 drive Cache pool in btfs RAID1 HP Ilo is now reporting predictive failure (Its Power On Hours are @ 44035 (5 years eek! - SSD has done well!) which I suspect has annoyed ilo! - Have purchased a replacement drive - same size. I have read the FAQ and want to check the process is still valid - Mount new HDD into Server (I do have enough spare ports to have them both connected at same time) Stop Array Swap failing cache drive with new drive in array config Start Array Wait for btfs balance - when complete "stop array" will become live. Stop Array - Halt Server - Physically Remove failing disk Move New Drive into correct bay Up Server. Start Array. Sound right? Do I need to do any formatting of the new drive in any way? Do I need to force a balance? Also as its a new drive (SSD) not sure if I need to worry about the SSD 6.9 reformatting MBR? as the other RAID1 drive will not have the MBR in the newer location. (Also a SSD) Dave (Most likely overthinking!)