Jump to content

itimpi

Moderators
  • Posts

    20,059
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    55

Community Answers

  1. itimpi's post in Help - Upgraded to 6.11.1 from 6.10.3 and now the server keeping shutting down was marked as the answer   
    You seem to have the NerdPack plugin installed which is incompatible with 6.11.x series? 
     
    Have you tried booting in Safe Mode (which disables loading plugins) to see if you get the same symptoms?   If Safe Mode works then you know a plugin is causing your issue.
  2. itimpi's post in disk offline contents emulated was marked as the answer   
    Nothing obviously wrong in the SMART report.    You might want to run an extended SMART test on the drive to make sure.
  3. itimpi's post in Does a slow parity hdd slows the faster nvme disk in use? was marked as the answer   
    This is true as far as writing to the array is concerned.
     
    if you have SSDs then these are normally used in a ‘pool’ external to the main array.   Pools can be made redundant by having multiple drives in the pool, but you are still constrained by the slowest component.   There is little point in having a SSD as an array drive with a HDD as parity, particularly with the way Unraid updates parity as described here in the online documentation accessible via the ‘Manual’ link at the bottom of the GUI or the DOCS link at the top of each forum page.
     
    With the drives you mention you could have a single drive array using the HDD.    Then you could have a single drive pool using the SSD to host VMs.docker containers and run them with the full performance offered by the SSD.   Since this configuration does not provide redundancy then you could could do periodic backs (frequency chosen by you) to make backups of the VM/docker files from the SSD to the HDD drive in the array.   Plugins are available that can automate this process.
  4. itimpi's post in ZFS guy here - I have questions... was marked as the answer   
    You get limited interaction from Limetech in the forums - they are mostly about users providing support.
     
    I suspect you are not going to get any information about this until Limetech are at least ready to beta test something.  My guess is that any early implementation is likely to simply provide ZFS as an alternative format for pools, but even that is speculation.
  5. itimpi's post in Files on wrong drive was marked as the answer   
    Sounds as if you are seeing a manifestation of the behaviour described here in the online documentation accessible via the 'Manual' link at the bottom of the GUI. 
     
    If you are on Unraid 6.10.x or later you could install the Dynamix File Manager plugin and use that to move files instead of Krusader.  This plugin is aware of the issue and will use a copy/delete strategy to avoid it.
  6. itimpi's post in Dead Drive? was marked as the answer   
    That disk looks very sick and definitely needs replacing ASAP
  7. itimpi's post in PHP 8.1.10 was marked as the answer   
    Docker containers have the software they use installed internally to the container.   If there is a problem with the PHP version then it is a container issue and nothing to do with Unraid.
  8. itimpi's post in NerdTools Has Warning From Fix Common Problems! was marked as the answer   
    With the fact that the NerdPack plugin is now deprecated then the warning from FCP probably needs updating so that it only issues the warning if the packages are not from Nerd Tools plugin.
  9. itimpi's post in SMB Share not able to see to access from windows machine was marked as the answer   
    Have you made sure you exported the share to make it visible on the network?   
  10. itimpi's post in Unable to create Unraid USB Stick was marked as the answer   
    If you are having problems with the USB Creator tool then you can try using the older Manual install method documented in the online documentation accessible via the ‘Manual’ link at the bottom of the GUI or the DOCS link at the top of each forum page.
  11. itimpi's post in one array disk failed want to replace with parity and use larger new party disk was marked as the answer   
    You can use the Parity Swap procedure that is designed for exactly this Use Case.
  12. itimpi's post in Why do transfer speeds bottom out? was marked as the answer   
    The delays are probably occurring when flushing RAM buffers to physical disks.
     
    you can never achieve anywhere near the native write speed of a drive as under Unraid a write operation always involves multiple I/O operations.    This is described here in the online documentation accessible via the ‘Manual’ link at the bottom of the GUI or the DOCS link at the top of each forum page.
  13. itimpi's post in [Solved] [6.11.0] Disk is not recognized after upgrade to 6.11.0 from 6.9.2 was marked as the answer   
    Have you tried  the process described here for handling unmiountable disks in the online documentation accessible via the ‘Manual’ link at the bottom of the GUI or the DOCS link at the top of each forum page?   
  14. itimpi's post in Use unraid without unraid.net connectivity? was marked as the answer   
    There is no connection to your Unraid server unless you install the MyServers plugin.   The only slight exception is if you are running a Trial version of Unraid when a temporary outward connection is made to check the Trial licence when the array is started.  The Unraid server can only be accessed remotely if you have installed the MyServers plugin AND enabled that feature.   
  15. itimpi's post in No sign of life after changing server was marked as the answer   
    Are you trying to boot in legacy or UEFI mode?  For UEFI mode the Unraid flash drive needs the trailing ~ character removing from the EFI folder name.
  16. itimpi's post in Unraid won't distribute to other drives on the share was marked as the answer   
    It is probably your very restrictive value for the shares Split Level setting that is causing your problem.   The Split Level setting will over-ride the Allocation method and Minimum Free Space setting in the event of contention between them as to what drive  to use (as documented here in the online documentation accessible via the ‘Manual’ link at the bottom of the GUI or the DOCS link at the top of each forum page).
  17. itimpi's post in Upgraded to 6.10.3 should Parity Check Tuning plugin be uninstalled? was marked as the answer   
    You can if you want but there is no need to as the plugin still functions as it has on earlier releases.   The plugin provides more extensive capabilities than the built-in support but if you do not use any of these extra options then less reason to keep it.
  18. itimpi's post in Files and folders disappeared from directory, yet avalible in CLI was marked as the answer   
    @tTownTom  have you checked the permissions at the Linux level on the share and the files in it?  There have been a number of reports of permissions being wrong for network access and it only showing up after upgrading.
     
    it might be worth posting your system’s diagnostics zip file to your next post in this thread to see if anyone can spot something there.
  19. itimpi's post in Drives stay spun up - Reads & writes occurring from unknown source was marked as the answer   
    You might want to check what is in the system share on disk5?   If it is the docker.img or libvirt.img files then having the docker/VM services enabled will keep the disk spinning.
  20. itimpi's post in jumping or skipping disk assignment order? was marked as the answer   
    Unraid does not mind if you leave gaps in the assigned drives.  Many people find it triggers their OCD, but as long as it does not worry you can leave the gaps in the assignments.   When you start the array only the disk slots that have drives assigned will be shown.
     
    Just in case it is relevant it is worth pointing out that Unraid does not care how/where the drive is connected as drives are identified by their serial number.  There is therefore no reason that the assignments to disk slots have to match the physical layout if that is not convenient.
  21. itimpi's post in No devices can see shares or server - Windows/Android/Ubuntu/MacOS was marked as the answer   
    That setting means it will not be visible or accessible on the network.    You need it set to Yes to see it on the network.
  22. itimpi's post in Root Partition is full - can no longer update unraid was marked as the answer   
    How much RAM do you have on the server?    You need a minimum of 4GB to successfully update via the GUI.   If you have less than that you will need to use the Manual upgrade process as described in the online documentation accessible via the ‘Manual’ link at the bottom of the GUI or the DOCS link at the top of each forum page.
  23. itimpi's post in Share connection issue was marked as the answer   
    That will be because when you make that sort of change Unraid restarts Samba so any transfer in progress at the time gets aborted.     There has been discussion about changing this to just tell Samba to reread its configuration file but as far as I know that has not happened and I do not know of any immediate plans to make such a change.
  24. itimpi's post in Possible bug/need advice - two disabled data disks (with two working parity) was marked as the answer   
    You can rebuild each disk in turn if that is more convenient.   After the first rebuild succeeds then the array will be back in a protected state.
  25. itimpi's post in This could be bad: Help with parity + data disk errors was marked as the answer   
    If when you got the original failure once you had described your problem and posted diagnostics so we could confirm there was nothing else obviously wrong we could have given you the steps to get Unraid to accept the original parity disk so that you could then probably get an error-free rebuild of disk3.
     
     In principle it is a good idea to ask for help before letting Unraid do anything you are not sure about.
×
×
  • Create New...