emrepolat7

I've been a long-time user of Unraid and have generally been satisfied with the update processes in the past. However, I wanted to share my feedback on the recent update process, which I found a bit disconcerting. The idea of redirecting the GUI to an external domain web page during the server update didn't sit well with me. I understand that the files are already being downloaded from an external domain during updates, but I still found this approach unsettling. It felt as if I was being transported outside the comfort of my home, giving me a sense of being in a different environment altogether. I appreciate the continuous efforts to enhance the Unraid experience and understand that changes are sometimes necessary. I just wanted to express my feelings about this particular aspect of the recent update process. Thank you for your attention and understanding.

This worked perfectly for me. https://www.reddit.com/r/MoonlightStreaming/comments/rzpcpc/moonlight_streaming_without_monitor_no_dummy_plug/

Thank you for your prompt reply. I understand your concerns about the dropdown becoming unwieldy with multiple links, and the potential complexities it may introduce to the plugin. I appreciate your perspective on this matter. I thought it would be easy to implement, but from what I've seen, it seems that the request is not as easily implementable as I initially thought. The reason I was looking for support for multiple links is to streamline access to various services that I have installed with docker compose. Thank you for your suggestion and insights. If you have any further recommendations or considerations, I'd be grateful to hear them.

May I request a new feature? The WebUI URL is indeed useful, but currently, it only supports a single link. Could you consider implementing support for multiple links? This would be beneficial as we have installed more than one service. Thank you.

Sometimes I also share the same thoughts as you. I know that Unraid is, in a way, a form of software RAID. However, I don't use this feature and use it in the way SimonF uses it. The only difference is that I use hardware RAID. (Of course, both hardware and software RAID have their pros and cons.) Using HPE Smart Storage, I have created raid 5 logical storage drive. Unraid detected my hard drive as one 8TB logical drive. I have zero problems with installing vm, docker, apps, plugins vs so on. Actually, asking Unraid to remove this feature is completely contrary to the original purpose of Unraid. (A bit funny, but if you remove the RAID part, it will be left with just "UN" in its name 😂) Because all the other features of Unraid (VM, Docker, etc.) are essentially open-source software that can be installed on a plain Linux. But there is a difference, and that is Unraid has beautifully and user-friendly shaped all these features. They have done this in a really successful and commendable way. What I mean is, even if the RAID part of Unraid is removed, I'm sure many people will want to buy it for the convenience it offers. Releasing such a version of Unraid would provide advantages to users. 1) Since this version is essentially composed of many open-source software, it can be sold at a more reasonable price. I'm sure many people would pay for a product that brings together all these features so successfully. 2) You won't need to stop the array to make some changes in Unraid settings. Because currently, you need to stop all VMs and Dockers every time you want to make some changes. 3) As you mentioned, some concepts will be simplified. No such as pools, parity, cache, aray, mover. 4) Maybe a performance increase? I'm not very sure about this, but Unraid is, after all, a kind of software RAID. I'm sure the RAID software is running in the background. Even if we don't use this feature, could removing it result in a performance increase? I wonder about that.

I really like using your plugin with tailscale. Thanks very much for the plugin. Since headscale is almost the self-hosted version of tailscale, I prefer to use headscale instead of tailscale. Are you planning to add this feature? if so, is there any progress for this feature?

is there any option to disable the plugin without uninstall? Sometimes I want to use my graphics card for a VM.

Definitely it is coming from stock Unraid. if you uncompress bzroot you will see.

Even though there are no dockers that are related to these folders, what may be the reason for these 2 folders repeatedly being created at every reboot? Could this be related to rc? ~/.config/remmina ~/.config/sakura

I thought that snapshot is not available on XFS. Recently I read that shaphot can be done through reflink. Do you think this can be implemented in your plugin?

Is it possible to build Linux kernel inside an LXC container?

Changed Status to Solved

I see. Thanks for the info.

root@PolSer:~# zfs list NAME USED AVAIL REFER MOUNTPOINT disk1 2.29T 8.49T 144K /mnt/disk1 disk1/appdata 43.1G 8.49T 43.1G /mnt/disk1/appdata disk1/backup 1.06T 8.49T 1.06T /mnt/disk1/backup disk1/domains 103G 8.49T 96K /mnt/disk1/domains disk1/domains/Windows11 103G 8.49T 103G /mnt/disk1/domains/Windows11 disk1/isos 9.74G 8.49T 9.74G /mnt/disk1/isos disk1/seafile 1.05T 8.49T 1.05T /mnt/disk1/seafile disk1/system 25.1G 8.49T 25.1G /mnt/disk1/system