Caennanu
Members-
Posts
158 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Recent Profile Visitors
The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.
Caennanu's Achievements
-
[Support] MarkusMcNugens Docker Repository
Caennanu replied to MarkusMcNugen's topic in Docker Containers
Hey Guys, Been using crushftp for a bit now, a lil on the down low. The webgui and ftp clients connect just fine, is why i haven't run into an issue yet. However, since i want to start serving the files via an webpage, i need to find the files. Even tho i set the FTP folder variable, i cannot find the uploaded files i can find using the webgui. So i'm wondering, where are the files and folders etc. stored? It seems to be like an in-memory thing? -
Pterodactyl Panel Install & Configure on Unraid using DOCKER (2021)
Caennanu replied to Sycotix's topic in Docker Containers
NAT aside, i've got another question / request. The other day pterodactyl screwed itsself up due to improper updating of the deamon. Eventually was able to fix this, but it resulted in multiple folders used by the docker containers to get other permissions, which caused the servers not to start because they didn't have write permissions. (i fixed this because of having a backup that also had the permissions) So my question is: can the guide be expanded to include troubleshooting steps on what to do when folder and file permissions specific to pterodactyl are botched? (i would offer a suggestion / write-up if i knew how to actually fix this, but i don't :() -
Pterodactyl Panel Install & Configure on Unraid using DOCKER (2021)
Caennanu replied to Sycotix's topic in Docker Containers
i think you have the same problem as me. you do not have the option to enable hair-pin nat or nat loopback. I bet if you are on the same LAN as the server, the node elements will work just fine. -
Pterodactyl Panel Install & Configure on Unraid using DOCKER (2021)
Caennanu replied to Sycotix's topic in Docker Containers
So to give an extra update. I have now installed nginx and followed the written guide, aside of the fact i'm feeling like the writeup is missing something (setting up a node reverse proxy without telling the panel where to find it?), it still isn't working externally. i can acces the panel, but cannot interact with the node. My geuss is that it is because i do not have a router that supports NAT loopback. Any suggestions on how to circumvent this? (i feel like this is the issue, but since its not in the 'assumptions' part, i cannot say with certainty). -
Pterodactyl Panel Install & Configure on Unraid using DOCKER (2021)
Caennanu replied to Sycotix's topic in Docker Containers
So... its been a while. but i'm attempting to gain acces to the files and stats of the servers externally, without using an reverse proxy. Friends are able to connect to the panel, can see the servers. They can see the files, but when it comes to editting or viewing the console page, there is an error. I have tried to open the ports for the deamon externally to no avail. My thinking is that it won't work, because external users cannot use the internal docker network. Could this cause the issues where the deamon bits of the panel are not accesible? If so, how would i go about 'fixing' this? -
Well, whaddaya know... Updated to 6.12 stable. And had the same issue. I had to reboot my router, as my static route wouldn't take hold. This allowed me to acces LAN, but nothing outside of it. Maybe that is the issue on your end too?
-
Alright, i do not know exactly what an hotspot does... (i know its function, but not its technical details). It sounds like the android phone creates a virtual network. Kind of like a WAN port. Creating a different subnet for the ipad. Can you check if the ipad gets an ip in the same range of your local network, and if it is the same. if that ip address is reserved from your own dhcp?
-
Allright. Can you connect to the unraid server via its DNS address, or only via its ip address? If the latter. its likely something in your DNS settings.
-
My best guess is that your windows is on the same if not similar subnet, and the phone is not.
-
Good day all, I've been using wireguard for a while, and always had the issue that i cannot acces the internet while connected to the VPN. Previously this was an non issue, as i didn't actually needed it, it recently however has become an issue. Now, i'm geussing since i used the quickstart guide, i should post here. So let me start with explaining the layout of my network. Starting from the ISP going in. From the ISP side, i have a WAN box (Ubiquiti EdgeRouter-12). - I use this to connect my optical connection directly to my network. This ER also serves as my firewall / DHCP server. - It runs the DHCP for 4 Vlan's (something with not wanting CCTV and IoT mixed in a network) The ER has a static route to my ICX 6450-48P, which serves as my router. - Primary reason for this is because the routing capacity of the ER is lacking - secondary reason, i need PoE ports more than the ER can supply, and i already had the ER - Third reason, the ICX has no WAN ability From the ICX, i connect to another ICX via a single 10gb fiber connection. Which has the unraid box behind it. The 2nd ICX is in switch mode. Firewall ruling disables acces between the different subnet, and the CCTV camera's have 1 hour of acces to the internet a week for only time synchronisation. On unraid i run dockers for pihole and lancache. Which effectively are my internal DNS servers. This should be a nice to know, but not a requirement as i don't need these for DNS purposes when using Wireguard. Troubleshooting steps: Changed connection types, which didn't yield any results (logical, but worth a shot) Changed DNS from local to 8.8.8.8, no notable results Added allowed ip's equal to the subnets of my Vlan's with the /24 notation, no notable results. When doing a tracert to a (both DNS and IP), i get a result only from my unraid box, everything after that times out. So my understanding is that the internet requests do not leave the unraid server. Which leads me to believe i'm missing a link between the server and the router. Am i assuming correctly? (NAT issue?) --- Solved --- After adding the static route not only to the ICX router but also to the ER (WAN), it works. So maybe one could adjust the write up, that the static routing needs to be in other places as well when there is a split configuration?
-
I do not know which it was trying to map at the time, as i fail to see the logic of the allocation. The only thing i found is that the TPU was allocated on bus 00, while it was trying to allocate it at 03. If anything was connected / assigned to 03 at the time i do not know. If it was... it was connecting to either of the folowing: LSI HBA, Adaptec HBA, Dual 10GB SFP NIC or GT710
-
@SimonF Makes sence in a way. Still i believe there should be a way to turn off auto start of VM's when starting VM manager. Specifically for issues like the one i experienced. We shall see, maybe i should log a bug report. or a feature request to add a toggle to the VM manager menu with something like 'Disable VM auto start'
-
@SimonF Thanks for the reply. The thing is, i couldn't start the VM manager without making unraid unresponsive. That is why i was looking for a way to at least disable the auto starting off the VM's within the manager. The reason i wanted to turn it off, is because 1 VM is non default. I had added the below line to the XML to load up the Coral TPU, which wasn't a passable pci-e device. Since i moved hardware around, or rather removed, it seemed that the Id of the coral TPU was different, and it was. <hostdev mode='subsystem' type='pci' managed='yes'> <driver name='vfio'/> <source> <address domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/> </source> <alias name='hostdev0'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x06' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/> </hostdev> The bus in question changed from 0x03 to 0x01. And i had no way to edit this. And that seemed the most logical cause of unraid becomming unstable.