uldise

on Ubuntu it should be: cat "/boot/config-`uname -r`" | grep CONFIG_USB_EHCI not sure it's the same for unRAID, cos /boot is your flash drive..

ok, but with those two lines you mention above unRAID v6b15 works just fine.. everything else i should test with this issue? i have no idea...

ok, i spent much time on this issue, and there are my current observations: fo me, it looks like it's flash dependent, cos i have two servers with very similar Lexar flash devices and both of them are resetting. on one server i have some sundisk flash too, and this one don't throw usb resets. my tests are performed on Ubuntu VM's with various kernels, and i paste syslog fragments below from both working and non-working: working one: Jun 25 14:31:02 i5TestUbuntu kernel: [ 4.669283] scsi 3:0:0:0: Direct-Access SanDisk Cruzer Glide 1.26 PQ: 0 ANSI: 5 Jun 25 14:31:02 i5TestUbuntu kernel: [ 4.671284] sd 3:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg2 type 0 Jun 25 14:31:02 i5TestUbuntu kernel: [ 4.686596] sd 3:0:0:0: [sdb] 15633408 512-byte logical blocks: (8.00 GB/7.45 GiB) Jun 25 14:31:02 i5TestUbuntu kernel: [ 4.700103] sd 3:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off Jun 25 14:31:02 i5TestUbuntu kernel: [ 4.700106] sd 3:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 43 00 00 00 Jun 25 14:31:02 i5TestUbuntu kernel: [ 4.712911] sd 3:0:0:0: [sdb] Write cache: disabled, read cache: enabled, doesn't support DPO or FUA Jun 25 14:31:02 i5TestUbuntu kernel: [ 4.959287] sdb: sdb1 Jun 25 14:31:02 i5TestUbuntu kernel: [ 5.037076] sd 3:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI removable disk nonworking: Jun 25 13:22:46 ubuntu15 kernel: [ 2.884010] scsi 2:0:0:0: Direct-Access Lexar USB Flash Drive 1100 PQ: 0 ANSI: 4 Jun 25 13:22:46 ubuntu15 kernel: [ 2.884299] sd 2:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg2 type 0 Jun 25 13:22:46 ubuntu15 kernel: [ 2.900210] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] 15659008 512-byte logical blocks: (8.01 GB/7.46 GiB) Jun 25 13:22:46 ubuntu15 kernel: [ 2.909449] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Write Protect is off Jun 25 13:22:46 ubuntu15 kernel: [ 2.909455] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Mode Sense: 43 00 00 00 Jun 25 13:22:46 ubuntu15 kernel: [ 2.918925] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] No Caching mode page found Jun 25 13:22:46 ubuntu15 kernel: [ 2.919135] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Assuming drive cache: write through Jun 25 13:22:46 ubuntu15 kernel: [ 2.978855] sdb: sdb1 Jun 25 13:22:46 ubuntu15 kernel: [ 3.015183] sd 2:0:0:0: [sdb] Attached SCSI removable disk i bolded one message above which seem make sense.. may be some of you with better Linux knowledge can comment it out?

ok, thanks for the info.. so you are using reader with flash card(which one? ) and if you have paid licence, then you must transfer your key?

Thanks a lot Dan, much appreciated! Will look into it shortly. Off to search for a microsd card.... I just used the same card reader with a generic microsd (32GB was all I had on hand). 20 minutes in, no more reset messages, whereas I was getting them about 40 seconds after booting, and then every 30 or so seconds. Running esxi 6, passing through the usb device, USB connected to a usb 2.0 port (wire from mobo header). Hi, can you show us a model of the MicroSD card reader?

quoting myself, just for reference: i setup my ubuntu 14.04 VM yesterday, tried various combinations with kernels 3.13, 3.19, 4.04 and all of them sooner or latter had USB errors.. tried Win8 too, worked, Esxi's vmkernel.log has no USB errors.. so, it looks like something weird for me with this..

Hi, i googled this with various combinations with no luck - i just think, there are not much Linux distros with kernel version 4 now.. for example, Ubuntu 15.10 (will arrive on October i think) will be the first Ubuntu release with kernel 4. so, i will try to setup ubuntu 14.04 with kernel 4 and see whats happening..

for me it's USB2. cos X9SCM nor x8DTG have no USB3 ports.. But is the flash drive a USB2 or USB3 flash drive? A USB3 unit will draw more power than a USB2 unit, even if it's used in a USB2 port. i have Sundisk SDCZ50-008G on my test server - i think it's USB2 flash.. sorry, for unRAID i use Lexar JumpDrive TwistTurn - USB flash drive - 8 GB - USB 2.0 - blue

for me it's USB2. cos X9SCM nor x8DTG have no USB3 ports..

here you go: http://unraid.zeron.ca/

BetaQuasi, are your unRAID v6 suffer for this USB glitch too?

Yes, those messages are on unRAID syslog - and keep repeating every 30 secs.. Quoted again myself - i can see those messages in vmkernel.log too.. 2015-06-17T13:17:23.385Z cpu2:41053)<6>usb 2-1.1: device is available for passthrough 2015-06-17T13:17:23.469Z cpu2:41053)<6>usb 2-1.1: reset high speed USB device number 3 using ehci_hcd 2015-06-17T13:17:23.591Z cpu6:41053)<6>usb 2-1.1: Device is allocated for USB passthrough use; not available for VMkernel use 2015-06-17T13:17:23.591Z cpu6:33149)<6>hub 2-1:1.0: resumed 2015-06-17T13:17:23.591Z cpu6:33149)<6>hub 2-1:1.0: suspended 2015-06-17T13:17:23.790Z cpu6:41053)<6>usb 2-1.1: reset high speed USB device number 3 using ehci_hcd

Hi, just upgraded plugin to latest version, smb mounts look promising but how about NFS? for me NFS between unRAID and Ubuntu workstation works approx twice as fast as SMB mounts.. if we use this to share files between two unRAID servers, then NFS works much faster i think..

Yes, those messages are on unRAID syslog - and keep repeating every 30 secs..

No, i think i will wait for some time to v6 final or more with production server upgrade, not decided jet i can setup test server with x9SCM-iif, but this will happen in the middle of the next week maybe, i'm not at my lab now.. but i'm sure, you can find v6b15 install(on limetech git? ) and give it a try.. Uldis ok, today i assembled back my test server with x9SCM-iif. esxi6 with unRAID 6b15 are working ok, then upgrade to unRAID V6 final and full syslog with similar messages as OP. and unRAID then is so unresponsive.. so i'm staying on b15 for a while....

No, i think i will wait for some time to v6 final or more with production server upgrade, not decided jet i can setup test server with x9SCM-iif, but this will happen in the middle of the next week maybe, i'm not at my lab now.. but i'm sure, you can find v6b15 install(on limetech git? ) and give it a try.. Uldis

i was running unRAID v6b15 with ESXI 5.5 on X9SCM-iif for a long time without any problems, just switched my motherboard to x8DTH-6F this week and no problems with USB with this mobo too, just looked at my syslog to confirm.. if this is an ESXI problem, i'm running esxi 5.5 initial release(ESXi-5.5.0-1331820-standard), not upgraded it jet since first install.

You will have to use the UEFI boot method then. Sounds like your MB like the SuperMicro X9SCM is not compatible with firmware flashing via dos boot USB stick. Before I accidentally bricked it I used a SuperMicro C2SBA+II to flash mine via the USB boot method. I have seen others post the UEFI boot method works on a X9SCM MB but I've never used it so cannot help. i have an SuperMicro X9SCM-iif and reflashed two M1015 cards via UEFI without no probs about two years ago - works like a charm

This is the serial ID, the same unRAID uses to identify the disks. You can set different mount points if you want. How do you set a different mount point? look at OP on the Video

Hi Zeron, How about update to v6 RC? looks like no choice to new update to every new linux kernel version..

stupid question: Have you latest version of the plugin installed?

Just issued a new version, see if it helps in your case. thanks! looks like everything is ok right now, i can see my boot device under unassigned devices and can mount it successfully! happy days :)

<Port> <HostPort>8384</HostPort> <ContainerPort>8384</ContainerPort> <Protocol>tcp</Protocol> </Port> are this setting correct? with gfjardim's docker i need to set ContainerPort to 8080 to get webgui to work, like this: <Port> <HostPort>8384</HostPort> <ContainerPort>8080</ContainerPort> <Protocol>tcp</Protocol> </Port>

Unfortunately, I don't have a working ESXi instance to debug this. ok, if i can help with testing, just let me know

Hi again, i have disk.EnableUUID option in place.. if this option is missing then i have no option to add my esxi RDM drives to unRAID. i have two RDM's in this config: Raid0 volume as parity and Raid1 volume as cache drive.. any other things to test? Hi, are there any news for my problem?