gfjardim

Yep. In fact it was a legacy code that loaded the default jQueryUI css from Dynamix styles directory. Since the plugin doesn't uses jQueryUI anymore, it was easy to fix that. Thanks for helping on fix this, @bonienl!

Nope, thought it was a Javascript error, but it's a CSS error. It displayed white text in a light background. Will be fixed in the next version. Thanks for reporting.

I need you to send me your web console output: https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Tools/Web_Console

@FreeMan, I don't know how, but it got paused because of some array event and you can't easily resume it. The best option now is to reboot the server. I'll add an icon to the interface letting users to manual resume in the next version.

Take a look into the plugin log and see if there's a reason it got paused (can be array operations, sync command issued, smartctl or hdparm instances that got stuck).

There is a disk in my array that has 21 reallocated sectors for ages (more than 5 years!). Reallocated sectors can be a symptom for a failing drive or can reflect a surface defect that occurred only once. The only way to tell the difference is to put the disk to run and monitor it. Since it's a backup server, you should be safe as long as you keep monitoring it.

Very nice work @jonp! I don't like dark themes, and this one is an improvement even to the old forum's theme. Thanks a lot!

You have encountered an odd error, but apparently your disk wasn't zeroed around byte 158607605760. Most common cause for this error is bad memory, so run memtest is advised. I have a theory about the "stuck in beginning of post-read" error. Will revise the code and make some changes to avoid this.

You're quite welcome!

@rctneil, any news?

One of my drives: Disk Drive: Seagate ST2000LM007 - 2TB Controler: VIA Technologies, Inc. VL805 USB 3.0 Host Controller (rev 01) Read speed: 97 MB/s Write Speed: 99 MB/s

Looking at your logs it got stuck in the beginning of the post read, so resuming from the beginning is the correct behavior.

Ok, will wait for your feedback.

No need to do that. Just stop the preclear, update the plugin and start it again.

Please update the plugin to 2018.08.27 and try it again. Let me know if that helped.

Nothing on this log, please send me your unRAID diagnostics file.

Something must went wrong. Please send me the Preclear plugin log (see the original post of this thread if you need guidance).

@rxnelson, there was a small bug preventing the toggle between scripts, fixed in version 2018.08.23. Thanks for reporting.

@Squid, could you confirm those weirdness with Tooltipster and Preclear you mentioned are gone?

Nope, drive is certified bad: === START OF READ SMART DATA SECTION === SMART overall-health self-assessment test result: FAILED! Drive failure expected in less than 24 hours. SAVE ALL DATA. See vendor-specific Attribute list for failed Attributes. ID# ATTRIBUTE_NAME FLAGS VALUE WORST THRESH FAIL RAW_VALUE 1 Raw_Read_Error_Rate PO-R-- 097 097 016 - 7 5 Reallocated_Sector_Ct PO--CK 100 100 005 - 156 196 Reallocated_Event_Count -O--CK 100 100 000 - 156 197 Current_Pending_Sector -O---K 100 100 000 - 7360

Nothing on your preclear_disk_log.txt file, very strange.

Yes, it is. When I get a little time I try to keep this updated.

Take a look into the OP and send me both diagnostics file and preclear log.

Those will be addressed in the next release, guys. Thanks for pointing them out.

If you call "headache-free" an easier setup, then you're about right, there's will be a handful of solutions out there to satisfy you. IMHO, "headache-free" NAS OS is something that will never exist; or you have some workload in the beginning with a more complicated setup, or you will buy a pre-customized product that will be easier to setup, but may lead to catastrophic loss with the usage of non-friendly SOHO storage system, because RAID5/6/Z are enterprise-focused on data availability and integrity, not on data resilience. Windows, by far, is not suited to the task, I'm afraid. Maybe LT could make things easier by creating some "wizard" setup that asks where the user want to store it's downloads, it's movies and it's documents, and the docker system request the predefined value instead of letting the user choose every path. But this didn't take the merits of the product itself.