Wowza! I can't imagine a better reason to register than to respond to that statement. What the poll clearly shows is that you do not know how to read polls. The poll clearly shows 51.5% of a few hundred current unraid users who inhabit this forum and like to vote in polls think 3T support should not be a priority. That leaves 48.5% expressing a desire for 3T support. 9 votes - that's your "wide margin"?
If these are the numbers generated by current users, imagine a poll of would-be users. How would the numbers shift if you put this question to a few hundred prospective buyers? Yes, that's right, it would be a landslide for 3T support, because no one is looking to build a new massive storage system based on software that doesn't support the largest readily available hard drives.
As a happy user of unraid for several months now, I am grateful for the existence of this software more than I can adequately express. I bought two licenses because I'm far more afraid of Tom losing interest in unraid than I am afraid of a flash drive failure. As a current user with a 2T based system with plenty of room, the best thing for me is a stable 5.0 with no 3T support since I won't need it for quite some time. But the best thing for Lime Tech is to snag as many fresh fish as it can by supporting the drives the fish want to use. That's my vote, and if you care at all about unraid succeeding as an enterprise, that should be your vote too.
The poll clearly show people want 5.0 more than 3tb support. The poll is slanted to try and have it support 3tb. Three of the four question support 3tb so of course is going to seem that half the people want it. Why not just ask, do you want 3tb support now or 5.0 now?
With that being said, I have plenty of room left in my 20 bay server so I want 5.0 stable.