theone

Thank you both for your inputs. hernandito, I like your text layout, but I will not change it at this point - there are too many options and each person would probably want it slightly different with different fields. I will look for a better way to partition the data to make it more readable. To make it more readable for now you can disable the fields you don't use much and use the tooltip (which I know is buggy on FF and MSIE ) for the rest of the info. trutl, Regarding the Power On Hours - I will look into it - I agree that hours count is enough.

Do you physically label/number your server?

Cross reference between what?

The numbering is just for reference when choosing a tray on the data tab in reference to the preview table also on the data table. It has no other meaning.

You can configure it as 5x3 horizontal or 3x5 horizontal if you don't like the vertical view. Regarding the USB flash drive location - I found a bug it should be showing on the right of the server - I will fix it in the next release. This is a known issue on FF and MSIE. I am looking for a solution for it. See previous thread messages regarding HTTP_USE_AGENT. Never encountered this issue - do you have javascript enabled in your browser? Will consider it - The issue is that if you are defined as not tabbed browsing then it wil fill up quite a large area - maybe show some sort of preview only. For "narrow" arrays the flash drives should be on the right and for "wide" arrays they should be on the bottom. Automatically detected. I will probably add options to choose tray size and font size. The preview will be available if I decide to add the layout as a section on the main unRAID screen. Will consider it. I originally wanted to avoid any maipulations on the actual array and devices. Will consider it. Should already be possible - configure the array as 5x3 Horizontal The USB wll be at the bottom though. Thank you for all your inputs.

Already in my Todo list - with a preview of the tray.

Can you post a screenshot, thanks.

Congratulations on the v6 final release. Hope too see many more with new features before unraid v7

Any suggestions would be welcome and considered.

Still not working - I rebooted the server, I cleared the browser cache but the tooltips still move out of the window and disappear. This release was not supposed to fix it. I still cannot get http_user_agent to work.

New Release: 2015.06.15 - Fixed indexing of tooltip table CSS - Added triangle/arrow to the Tooltip frame - Added USB devices on "Layout" tab - see below screenshots

I'm no php expert, but when I google that the examples always come back with single quotes, not double: $_SERVER['HTTP_USER_AGENT'] From this page: It doesn't work- I tried both and returns nothing...

I think I found a way to fix this... BUT for that I need to identify the browser type the user is running. I need to differentiate between Chrome and FF/MSIE. I tried $_SERVER["HTTP_USER_AGENT"] but I get nothing back - so I am stuck ! What am I doing wrong? or can't I do it under unRAID (this is a server side thing - isn't it)?

I acknowledge this issue (also on MS Internet Explorer) - somehow I missed it - on Chrome it is working flawlessly. On first glance it seems that on FF and MSIE the "hover" is relative to the the whole matrix (right edge of the array) and on Chrome it is relative to each TRAY as it should be. Need to understand why ... and fix it

New Release: 2015.06.12 - Added device status icon (same as unRAID icons) - as requested - Added option to delete historical devices (per device) from database under "Historical Device" table See attached screenshots

After a plugin update scan, if there are any updates available: * Add button to allow update all * Add checkbox next to each available update and a button at the top to udpate all selected updates

I was thinking the same thing today: http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=40518.msg382491#msg382491

New Release: 2015.06.11 - Remove EMPTY row and columns pull-down options in Layout Settings - HW scan speed optimization - Changed USB path from "lsusb" to "lsscsi -t" - HW scan speed optimization - Changed USB data gathering from "lsusb -D" to "udevadm" so I can scan only USB storage devices Main change Reduce plugin load time due to storage device information scanning. On my server with 8 HDDs and 1 USB storage device (flash) I went from over 10 seconds to under 3 seconds.

You CAN ... but think carefully about whether you want to. Virtualization of multiple systems in a single box works very nicely for a lot of applications [e.g. multiple servers with varying "roles"]; but for those that require desktop interfaces (i.e. display, keyboard, mouse, and remote control) you need to consider how those functions will be implemented at the display end. As an example, with KODI you need a remote control; video; audio; etc. -- so if you run a virtualized instance of it you not only need to provide a video adapter to the VM, but need to get the A/V output to your TV and the remote control input (and perhaps a keyboard) to the server. There are not-too-difficult solutions to this [e.g. HDMI over Cat-6 and KVM over IP], but if you've already got a good solution (i.e. an Android box) be sure you recognize the tradeoffs in moving the computational resources to a single box. Thanks, I am aware of this. I already have an MCE remote with USB connection for my android box. In addition my server is under the stairs, which are next to the living room, near my AV Receiver so I just need a very short HDMI cable between them and from there it is already connected to the TV.

According to this: https://software.intel.com/en-us/blogs/2014/05/02/intel-graphics-virtualization-update http://www.techenablement.com/multios-gaming-media-and-opencl-using-xengt-virtual-machines-on-shared-intel-gpus/ http://lwn.net/Articles/624516/ There should already be a XEN option to virtualize intel integrated GPUs Intel® GVT-g and KVM is forthcoming... or am I missing something...?

So there is no advantage to have integrated graphics? Is it a current state that can change in the future or is it a hw thing?

After seeing the Category5 interview I realized that I can run my KODI in the living room on the unRAID box instead of the Android TV box I have. The question is: * Can I pass the internal CPU GPU of the E3-1226v3 to the VM? * If not then I will need a PCIe GPU and a free x16 PCIe slot on the motherboard - which exists on the X10SLL-F but I don't think exists on the C2750 motherboards...

I will look into these feature requests.

Please elaborate and give an example if you can.

Certainly very close to it ... remember these CPU's max out at 20w => and that's at 100% CPU utilization (compared to 84W for a Xeon at 100%). And the XEONs? How do they perform power-wise with a running VM at 20-30% CPU?