Jump to content

bonienl

Community Developer
  • Posts

    10,233
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    65

Report Comments posted by bonienl

  1. @alturismo can you do the following?

     

    • Stop docker and vm services
    • Disable bridging for network interface eth0 (see network settings)
    • Docker settings should now show eth0 instead of br0 (see docker settings)
    • Start docker service
    • The container(s) which previously made use of macvlan network br0 must be updated to use now eth0
    • Start your test with the container which caused the call traces

     

    Reason for this test

    There is a suspicion that there occurs a conflict situation between bridge function and macvlan function.

    Letting macvlan operate directly on the interface should take away this conflict.

     

    Thanks for all your help

     

  2. 4 minutes ago, sonic6 said:

    But if i'm right, it should be enough deactivating the DHCPv6 function in my router

     

    The manual isn't very clear when disabling the DHCPv6 function, it will use only SLAAC.

    You can try, and it might be necessary to set a fixed DNSv6 server in your Unraid system. You can use the Google servers:

    2001:4860:4860::8888 and/or 2001:4860:4860::8844

     

  3. 2 minutes ago, sonic6 said:

    In this Case i used the "IPv4 only" mode, like you suggested. But my LXC Container was pingable over IPv6... i was just wondering.

     

    Sorry, I misunderstood. In IPv4 only mode it is normal that IPv6 does not work.

    Apparently the LXC container does its own thing independently of the Unraid settings, I guess it is created with both ipv4 and ipv6 enabled.

     

    The DHCP error related to IPv6 and network call trace, I saw last time are not there anymore.

    Your router is set up using DHCP for IPv6, can it be changed  to use SLAAC instead?

     

    7 minutes ago, sonic6 said:

    I am using both in my setup, br0 and host access.

     

    Why do you need host access?

     

  4. 1 hour ago, sonic6 said:

    Unraid itself and Dockers aren't pingable with ipv6

     

    To me that looks like a configuration or network setup error. The PC, when it has both IPv4 and IPv6 addresses should be able to reach the server.

     

    I am running pi-hole as a docker container on my server, pinging it from my pc just works fine

     

    C:\>ping -4 10.0.101.100
    
    Pinging 10.0.101.100 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 10.0.101.100: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 10.0.101.100: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 10.0.101.100: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
    Reply from 10.0.101.100: bytes=32 time<1ms TTL=64
    
    Ping statistics for 10.0.101.100:
        Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
        Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
    
    C:\>ping -6 2a02:a448:32d5:101::100
    
    Pinging 2a02:a448:32d5:101::100 with 32 bytes of data:
    Reply from 2a02:a448:32d5:101::100: time<1ms
    Reply from 2a02:a448:32d5:101::100: time<1ms
    Reply from 2a02:a448:32d5:101::100: time<1ms
    Reply from 2a02:a448:32d5:101::100: time<1ms
    
    Ping statistics for 2a02:a448:32d5:101::100:
        Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
        Minimum = 0ms, Maximum = 0ms, Average = 0ms
    
    C:\>

     

    Note: for this there is no need to enable host access (Unraid itself is not involved in this communication)

     

  5. 7 minutes ago, Zonediver said:

    Have you seen this "RED MARKED" Text on the right side?

     

    The biggest confusion for many (new) users is the use of the name "cache", mainly because not all users are familiar with the specific implementation of Unraid and how "cache" is used.

     

    The new approach in Unraid 6.12 takes that confusion away and shows primary and secondary storage instead.

    This storage can be the array or any of the existing pools, including a pool called "cache".

     

    • Upvote 1
  6. 4 minutes ago, Titan84 said:

    Does 6.12 do something similar?

     

    The automatic size calculation of Unraid 6.12 takes 10% of the reported disk size as reported by the file system, which is static. There is no need to schedule rechecks.

    The plugin determines the minimum size based on content and make changes depending on the size of the biggest file, which is dynamic. Here a scheduled recheck is needed as content can change.

     

    • Thanks 1
  7. 27 minutes ago, itimpi said:

    Guess I could try that out and see

     

    For a share which resides on a pool only, it will take the size of the pool as reported by the file system.

    For a share which resides on the array, it will take the size of the smallest disk in the array, again as reported by the file system.

     

  8. This version also does automatic calculation of the minimum free space setting for any new share.

    Existing shares can be easily updated by forcing a change in the settings (e.g. enter a space in the min. free space field) and apply.

     

    The user can still set a designated value and overruling the automatic calculation.

    Values can be entered as absolute numbers with an optional suffix or as a percentage value.

     

  9. By default all folders are part of the caching system, it is however recommended to do caching for specific folders which need it. This is done by either defining an explicit "include" list, or alternatively create an "exclude" list, which ever suits best. It is not necessary to set both include and exclude lists.

     

×
×
  • Create New...