• Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by live4soccer7

  1. I have haproxy on pfsense and am trying to setup Authelia. It is a real bear to get to work. I've been following this: I know I'm extremely close to having it work. I attempted this about a year or more ago and couldn't get it. I came across the above post a few days ago and thought I would give it another "whack"
  2. Has anyone ever seen this before? It has stumped me for a couple days now: time="2022-03-13T09:26:36-07:00" level=error msg="Scheme of target URL //synoscgi.sock/ must be secure since cookies are only transported over a secure connection for security reasons" method=HEAD path=/api/verify remote_ip= stack=" VerifyGet.func1\ AutheliaMiddleware.func1.1\ (*Router).Handler\ LogRequestMiddleware.func1\ (*Server).serveConn\ (*workerPool).workerFunc\ (*workerPool).getCh.func1\nruntime/asm_amd64.s:1581 goexit" I know it is a configuration type of thing and not the actual docker, but I was hoping for any kind of additional clues at all
  3. Has anyone successfully been able to run DSM 7.01? I have tried and tried without success. The build supposedly happens successfully, however I'm not convinced. Yes, I can not get to the gui via the IP nor can I ping it, but I'm not convinced everything else went right up to that point. I think that perhaps some of the "extensions" needed are not available and hence something needs changed in the XML. I have tried every single bus type and tried USB with this same result below. The other reason I think that the image is not properly being added to the "media" is because the allocation only shows 4k. Any ideas?
  4. I just turned it off for now since I'm not using it at the moment. I do plan to soon, so I will check on this. Thank you
  5. Is it normal for this docker to create entries in the log every few seconds or so? I just worry about the log size and if there is a possible issue causing this.
  6. Yeah, there are many different ways you can configure them. I looked at the photos/configs when I initially got the unit and didn't see anything referencing connecting the two IOM modules on the same shelf together.
  7. That what I had originally thought as well, but had read a thread somewhere saying someone connected the two IOM6 modules. There were no details or additional information, so he/she may definitely be wrong. Figured I would look into it and see if anyone knew or if I could find supporting documentation. @JorgeB Thanks for always answering pretty much all my questions lately. I've just been doing a lot of restructuring and updating decade old equipment from when I first got started with unraid.
  8. With the netapps, they have two IOM6 modules. I currently have an HBA that is connected to the top module's "square" marked QSFP+ port (I think that's the cable, my memory can't remember everything, lol). That's the only cable I have hooked to the whole thing. Should I then connect the top module's "circle" port to the bottom modules "square" port? If so, will this increase write speed to the array/disks (pooled devices, not in the unraid array)? Or is this more of a redundancy thing? or none of the above.
  9. Yes, I completely agree. I am mounting the shares in the clients fstab.
  10. I have a couple windows machines and the transfer speeds to the smb shares are always 100MB/s +. I setup nfs and also smb on ubuntu, but the speeds are roughly half that of a windows machine.. From windows, I'm basically saturating the gig speeds. It's not a bad cable as I have multiple ubuntu installs that have the same issue. Surely, I'm needing to add a parameter to the fstab file. Any ideas or anyone willing to share their fstab line for their share (nfs or cifs) that gets gig transfer speeds?
  11. It is the SAS2-EL2. It was very difficult to see and even then it was a blurry image through my phone camera.
  12. I just checked the global settings and while you can set it to SAT, you can not specify "12" in the global setting. My guess is that it wouldn't work properly. Luckily, this will get fixed in the next release.
  13. I am not sure. I thought about changing to global setting, but I also have 25 or so other disks a part of the unraid array that I didn't want to lose data for. I would imagine the global setting would persist. I would like to run smart tests on all 48 disks and be able to see the temps. The smart tests for now because the unit is newer and the seller said he would replace and disks that failed the smart test.
  14. Thanks. I have compared pics and given the serial number and the build model number to supermicro and everything indicates SAS2 EL1
  15. Any major issues with v6.10-rc1? I'm kind of needing that to work to help report issues with disks from smart reports.
  16. I have a scenario where I have to change from the "default" settings on the spin up and spin down settings when you click into a disk. Same things for SMART test controller. I change the settings and then once I go back into their they are set back to say "Default". I have clicked apply in that specific section the settings applies to. I have then tried clicking "done" and also just going back to the main tab. If they do persist, it is only for a few minutes/hours and then they seem to revert back to say "Default". Any ideas? Edit: I'm usually trying to change these when the array has already been started.
  17. That's sort of what I've grasped from all of this. haha. I was thinking share parameters/ownership or whatever was applied during a file transfer and not strictly based on the share being created and the file just being transferred to that folder.
  18. I did mv. Gone, no where to be found. I was using MC. same file. I thought, well I'll be sure all these files are a part of the share. That was definitely not the correct thinking. lol. It isn't a big deal because I can reproduce the data, but it does put me about a week back.
  19. This: If you mix user shares and disks when moving/copying files, you can actually lose data, because Linux doesn't realize that the source path and the destination path might actually be the same file, and so tries to overwrite what it is trying to read. This is often referred to as the User Share Copy Bug. I tried it out of curiosity, pretty sure lost that data. It wasn't a ton though, so not a big deal. I've been searching the whole server for it.
  20. I'm curious, what happens or doesn't happen if you go from disk shares to user shares or vice versa?
  21. SM said it was BPN-SAS2-846EL1, which is what I was thinking. I am also trying to confirm with the seller as I really don't want a SAS1 backplane.
  22. Thank you. I will try to give them a call. I am trying to compare some pics online as well.
  23. I am buying this, but am having the seller check which backplane is installed. He does not know much about it and can't seem to locate the number of the backplane for some reason. I think he simply has no idea what/where to look. I pretty much just want to be sure it is one of the SAS2 backplane/expanders and not the BPN-SAS-846A backplane. I'm not terribly familiar with them and never had one in person, so I can't tell from the pics. This is the cable that is in the picture:
  24. Well.... I learned the hard way that if you don't do background and your ssh loses connection then the transfer will fail. That lost about 16 hours. haha. Is there a way to check progress of the background process? I started a new one. Also, what is the behavior of "background" for copying a file if it already exists in the destination? I see that it doesn't ask you or mention it. I had too many files to manually go through, so I just copied all the original files to the destination again.
  25. Great tips! How can I get into the menus at the top from just a keyboard?