Scottathon

I "updated" my python2.7 version in the plugin, but it turns out it downgraded my python from 2.7.17 to 2.7.11 and broke some of my scripts. Is there any way that I can specify the version installed by the plugin?

I recently bought a 4U 24 bay Supermicro system off a friend, but am unable to get unRAID to see any of my hard drives. The RAID controller is a LSI Megaraid 9265-8i, and there doesn't seem to be any conclusive information out there for putting that card into IT mode. The card is connected to the backplane with a single SFF-8087 cable, though the card has two SFF-8087 ports; the 20 or so SATA drives I have installed are visible in the controller UI, but it seems like the only solution to let unRAID see them is to create single-disk RAID volumes, which seems like a bad idea. According to unRAID, my motherboard is a X9DR3-F. Can anyone recommend an easy to find on ebay replacement card that would fit my use case? Cheers.

I'll check it out. Thank you again!

It just seemed like a cleaner solution . I'll try to figure out with a daemon then. Thanks for the response!

Darn, really? There's no way to make rclone accessible inside the docker?

Has anyone had any luck getting the rclone plugin to work in conjunction with this docker? I'd love to be able to add a post-processing script to run rclone after something downloads, but I can't figure out how to actually pass rclone into the docker so that it can actually run it. Any ideas?

I'd be eternally grateful if someone could get a template for Ampache, or even instructions to get one of the converted ones from Docker Hub working.

Very interesting, I wasn't aware of this feature. Is there any reason to not enable this if I always keep my disks spinning?

Thank you! That worked. Alternately, I realized that I could open up the browser developer tools to remove the disabled attribute from the input element to edit the field.

Is there a way to change the container port for a docker? The UI has greyed out the field which is preventing me from doing so. I understand that most dockers require a specific container port, but is there any way to change it? I'm guessing that the docker configs are maybe stored as text files somewhere, but I don't know where to look. I run multiple Transmission containers, and despite having my ports forwarded correctly, I am reported as unconnectable on an assortment of trackers. I would like to change my container ports to match my host ports so that whatever method Transmission uses to report my port status will stop failing. Thanks!

Thank you for this awesome docker! I have two questions: 1. How can one go about actually retrieving updates to the database? Does it happen automatically? 2. Is it possible to connect to the postgres instance via an external client? By that, I mean can I use pgAdmin III on my Windows box to run queries against the postgres instance inside this docker? Cheers! Scott

That would be greatly appreciated, and thank you for your work on this docker. This is a snippet from my Office.items file that works for WOL: Switch Desktop "Desktop" (Office) { wol="192.168.1.100#FF:FF:FF:FF:FF:FF"} You'll have to change the ip address and the mac address to match the computer you're trying to wake up. Thank you! I mistakenly was starting to think that the first three parts of my openhab instance's IP address had to match that of the computer I was trying to wake, but it turns out that this was incorrect. Thanks again!

That would be greatly appreciated, and thank you for your work on this docker.

Thank you for the updates, Bungy. I've been able to get openhab running, and I'm probably going to buy way too much hardware now that I've got such a neat platform running. I've got an issue specific to openhab being run in a docker container though; I can't get Wake-On-Lan to work. According to ifconfig, docker is running on: docker0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 172.17.42.1 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast 0.0.0.0 The box I'm trying to hit is at 192.168.2.102 with a netmask of 255.255.255.0. I'm not 100% sure whether or not the failure is because of the docker's IP or the netmask. Is there some way I can choose the IP and netmask of the docker container?

Firstly, apologies if this is covered elsewhere. I'm at a bit of a loss regarding what to do when I want to add some dependencies to a docker container beyond what was defined in the docker file. For example, I'm running smdion's beets docker. I would like to add this plugin https://github.com/jcazevedo/beets-rymgenre to my configuration, but it requires two dependencies from pip (lxml and requests) that are not in the docker file. What is the best way to get these dependencies added? Do I somehow fork the docker repo on docker.com? Is there some way to add them with the container definition in the unRAID docker UI? If I try to install the dependencies by running "docker exec -it beets bash", will my changes persist when I restart the container? Thanks for your advice. Scott

I would also love to be able to do this.

Thanks guys. Setting the static IP has resolved it.

I experienced a power outage the other night, and I've been going crazy with regard to my server ever since. I was unable to connect to it via samba or putty, so I dug out a keyboard and started poking around. This was the output of ifconfig: eth0 Link encap:Ethernet HWaddr 00:17:31:15:da:8a inet addr:169.254.8.9 Bcast:169.254.255.255 Mask:255.255.0.0 UP BROADCAST RUNNING MULTICAST MTU:1500 Metric:1 RX packets:0 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:45 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:1000 RX bytes:0 (0.0 B) TX bytes:6898 (6.7 KiB) Interrupt:19 lo Link encap:Local Loopback inet addr:127.0.0.1 Mask:255.0.0.0 UP LOOPBACK RUNNING MTU:16436 Metric:1 RX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 frame:0 TX packets:8 errors:0 dropped:0 overruns:0 carrier:0 collisions:0 txqueuelen:0 RX bytes:560 (560.0 B) TX bytes:560 (560.0 B) I checked my /boot/config/network.cfg file, but it looked fine to me: # Generated network settings USE_DHCP=yes IPADDR= NETMASK= GATEWAY= I am running 5.0-beta14. I should note that my server is connected to my home network with a powerline ethernet adapter, but I don't think that's the issue; my laptop got an IP address within my range when I plugged it in. The router that my ISP gives out seems pretty restrictive in terms of settings, but it has these values set: Modem IP Address: 192.168.2.1 Modem Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0 DHCP Server: Enable Beginning IP Address: 192.168.2.10 Ending IP Address: 192.168.2.254 Subnet Mask: 255.255.255.0 Any insight would be appreciated. Cheers, Scott log.txt

I upgraded over the weekend from 4.7 to 5.0-beta14 so that I can start using a 3TB drive. I ran the new permissions util twice, but I still cannot modify some files in my shares. Some of my files are listed as drwxrwx---, but others are dr-xr-x--- within the same directory on the same drive. I have run newperms on the files that have the restrictive permissions, but nothing changes. Can anyone offer any advice? log.zip

Thank you so much for the advice! I'll swap the two PSUs this weekend. I hope that and the upgrade from 5.0-beta14 goes smoothly.

I'm about to add a new drive, and I'd like to know what are the limitations of my current power supply, and whether or not I should opt for a better one. My current Norco 4224 build is using a OCZ StealthXStream OCZ600SXS 600W specs: http://www.newegg.ca/Product/Product.aspx?Item=N82E16817341010 My build has 3 7200RPM drives and 9 Green drives. I'm about to add another Green drive. Do you guys think I'm okay to do so? If not, would the Corsair TX750W 750W that I currently have in my desktop be better? I'll swap them if necessary. specs http://ncix.com/products/?sku=26415 Thanks, Scott

$159 at NCIX: http://ncix.com/products/index.php?sku=67447&vpn=WD30EZRS&manufacture=Western%20Digital%20WD&promoid=1012 Shipping isn't free though, but it's a couple of bucks cheaper still.

I like MusicBrainz Picard. It uses acoustic fingerprinting to identify songs against their online database. It works pretty well, and has some neat plugins.

did you get the new yellow ones? if so, i'd love to see a picture.. Yes, they are yellow. I'll take a build picture when I get everything put together.

I was wary of going the 4224 route because of complaints about faulty backplanes, but I took the plunge and am happy to report that all six of them seem to work. Huzzah.