• Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Darksurf

  1. I greatly appreciate the speed on this fix. I use Wi-Fi and without some other form of auth beyond WPA2 we know nothing is truly secure. I need to get radius or something setup when I'm less lazy. I do have other users on my limetech server, just not privileged. Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
  2. http://arstechnica.com/security/2016/10/most-serious-linux-privilege-escalation-bug-ever-is-under-active-exploit/ I know this software isn't really security revolving considering we don't have HTTPS and don't support using in a non trusted environment, but we should probably take this seriously. Sent from my Nexus 6P using Tapatalk
  3. I really really want this. Hows the performance compared to BTRFS and is anyone having any issues with unRAID updating and not having support for your shares until the next update of the driver?
  4. Thanks to Limetech we now have VLAN support in UnRAID! With this I'm now able to do what I've wanted for a long time. My Ubiquiti Edge Pro router is crap when it comes to dhcp. reserving an IP for a single machine results in that machine having difficulty communicating with the rest of the network. DNS doesn't work correctly, broadcast stuff seems wonky (no steamlink, or chromecasts found when scanning), its a PITA. I want to create a DHCP/DNS docker, but with multi-vlan support. I see an enable vlans option in networking. Is that required for the system to read vlan tagging? Also, will the docker be able to capture broadcasts/requests for addresses since its usually ports that are funneled to the docker? Do I need to add the vlans in unraid? or should I just add the vlans in docker? I'm doing this for multiple reasons. one to learn, and two because I need a multi-vlan dhcp server. In the future I wouldn't be opposed to allowing Unraid act as my dhcp server, but I'd really like to learn how to do this. Thanks guys, Frosty
  5. Thanks, worked like a champ! any idea on the network.ini file errors? Also is there a bugzilla or something for unraid? I've got KVM doing some strange stuff. I just started a new VM and its seeing "Uhhuh. NMI received for unknown reason 00 on CPU 0. Do you have a strange power saving mode enabled? Dazed and Confused, but trying to continue." It just keeps popping up in my journal over and over in the guest VM.
  6. I've got it working now. I ended up rearranging my entire network rack yesterday since I was running wire in the attic an adding APs to the house. I wanted to clean up the rack as well. Well, I only plugged in 2 ethernet cables, the IPMI and eth0. Its has a failover bond and I had multiple connections. Still wasn't working. so I decided to reboot, I still had the window for IPMI open so I sent reboot command. As it was going down it got hung up as shutting down VMs and dockers. I noticed it had also halted plugins. So I refreshed the page. Sure enough, its working now. So I hopped in and deleted the deluge plugin before shutdown finished. booted back up and web-ui now works! Docker still seems to have some issues. I had docker updates and attempting to update gave me this "Error: layers from manifest don't match image configuration" I'll probably have to start over on the docker. luckily its just a ubiquiti unifi docker, still its gonna be some work. I'm still getting the strange /var/local/emhttp/network.ini errors. sure wish I knew what that was about and how to fix it. Editing that file does nothing as it just reverts back after reboot any idea would be greatly appreciated! Frosty
  7. Dang , just switched over from unraid 6.1.9 . Now my web-ui no longer works. Terminal shows nohup: redirecting stderr to stdout /var/local/emhttp/network.ini: line1: [eth0]: command not found /var/local/emhttp/network.ini: line16: DESCRIPTION:0=: command not found /var/local/emhttp/network.ini: line17: USE_DHCP:0=no: command not found /var/local/emhttp/network.ini: line18: IPADDR:0= command not found /var/local/emhttp/network.ini: line19: NETMASK:0= command not found any ideas?
  8. So I guess that would work. I could setup a bridge per NIC so BR1 and BR2 to connect the VMs to the NICs. I've never actually done this before so I'll poke around a research a bit. If anyone has the solution on how feel free to post it please.
  9. So I'm currently trying to create a VM that will be my Domain Controller (VLANs, DHCP, DNS, OpenLDAP, PXE, Auth/Radius) Called Controller0 and I'd like to eventually create a redundant Controller1. My motherboard comes with 4NICs+1IPMI. I'm using 1NIC currently for the server itself and plan to bond 2 for Unraid in the future. The last 2 I'd like to dedicate to Controller0/1 vs having to deal with a bridged connection. Unfortunately I only get the option to select a "Network Bridge". Any help would be greatly appreciated. Model: 8core-Avoton 32GB ECC DDR3 M/B: Supermicro - A1SAi CPU: Intel® Atom™ CPU C2750 @ 2.40GHz HVM: Enabled IOMMU: Disabled Cache: 448 kB, 4096 kB Memory: 32768 MB (max. installable capacity 64 GB) Network: bond0: fault-tolerance (active-backup) eth0: 1000Mb/s - Full Duplex eth1: 1000Mb/s - Full Duplex eth2: 1000Mb/s - Full Duplex eth3: not connected Kernel: Linux 4.1.18-unRAID x86_64
  10. I'm also extremely interested in dual parity. After one of my friends had dual HDD failures due to having all seagates, I'm a little leery of my seagate drives. I've got 2 seagate and 2 toshiba(rebranded Hitachi). In my experience the Hitachi drives are the reliable way to go.
  11. I'm in /var/log looking for old logs (messages/syslog) as I'm trying to troubleshoot a bad stick of ram. (started getting uncorrectable memory errors on ECC memory) I'm finding messages and syslog are only logs from the current boot! nothing from last boot or few times before. This is a huge problem considering logs are the lifeblood of much troubleshooting. Also, I have ECC memory in my server but couldn't load edac_core to troubleshoot which stick of memory has the uncorrectable errors. So currently we have no past logs or methods to troubleshoot ECC memory. Is there anything I can do to assist in moving this forward ASAP as an update? Thanks, Frosty
  12. mc is easy enough to install, although keeping inline with how we are using unraid and packages, you could ask eschultz to add it to the nerdpack plugin. otherwise you could just use wget, tar, ./configure, make, make install...
  13. I definitely need this. Setting up a DHCP server docker on my unraid server and it needs to have vlan tagging to support giving multiple vlans IP addresses or put dockers on separate vlans
  14. Wow, Almost a year later and no updates on how to switch to https?! This is a MUST.
  15. OMG thank you. I heavily depend on F2FS. It is my primary File System I use for flash drives. Its proven more reliable than FAT or NTFS over the years.
  16. HellDiverUK, I'd thought about that myself. But I checked the BTRFS website (as well as several other angry sources) and its a known issue and claims to be fixed in 3.19.5 and 4.x Going forward. So this exact issue is INDEED a BTRFS issue. RAID isn't Hardware raid either, its BTRFS software RAID. Until I see it proven solid, the cake is a lie.
  17. I've not used BTRFS in unRAID yet. Ordered Unraid 6 on a USB 3 drive not to long ago and its in the mail. But I did test BTRFS on the 3.19.3 kernel on my Sabayon tower and I can report it is DISASTROUS! I made a RAID10 of 4 1TB HDDs (WD REDS) in a new ICY DOCK USB3 enclosure. All went well at first and I began debating ditching ZFS for a more Linux friendly/supported FS. So I started to migrate (copy) all my data (~1.8TB) off my FreeNAS VM through the network to this BTRFS RAID. Worked great for several hours and was fairly speedy. Right before the 24 hr marker I noticed all my files had "finished" being copied over. I went to double check only to find about 1TB of data and the drive had been marked RO? I looked in dmesg and found tons of complaints about metadata corruption on "sdg". Looked into it, this is a known common issue until kernel 3.19.5 and there IS NO FIX. I would have to remove the drive from the RAID, wipe it, then re-add it to the RAID. SMART data shows drive is fine and all works fine with ZFS. Sadly BTRFS is garbage and instable in my eyes. If I lose a drive in RAID10 due to the FS in less than 24hrs, forget that crap! I'd much rather have ZoL. Devs who claimed businesses should use this FS as "it is stable now" are a bunch of liars and are full of it. Wait for 4.0 kernel or.. wait until someone else takes a dive and it works. I'll probably give it another try when 4.0 comes out and if I see good reviews. Please devs, include ZFS support with the 4.0 kernel. I like my data and prefer to keep it.