• Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won


ezhik last won the day on November 20 2020

ezhik had the most liked content!

1 Follower


  • Gender

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

ezhik's Achievements


Enthusiast (6/14)



  1. Now we are talking! Top notch man!
  2. Looks good! I am not a fan of Intel stock CPU coolers, those are pretty bad :-/
  3. Which means perl and temperature monitoring won't work? That's not good news.
  4. Can confirm run into the same issue. Drives that are not assigned to an array and for example are used as passthrough drives for the VM, send out notifications for drives surpassing the default thresholds of 45C, regardless of the values you set.
  5. When it comes to software development, ideally the structure would be: 6.9.1 6 - Major 9 - Minor 1 - Patch -- With unRAID we have seen that Minor releases are treated as major and contain a lot of new features.
  6. Right, the OP did. Apologies there, got mixed up.
  7. The good old base64.
  8. Betas are not releases though, they are considered pre-release and are mainly used for testing purposes. When you say release, you mean the stable version and that takes on average 12+ months. Mind you, major releases require major resources
  9. 6.10 would be considered a major release, I wouldn't count it being until year end at the earliest.
  10. Also noticed that when you reset drive assignments, your settings get reset as well - I think that's wrong: The following settings get reset: Global disk settings [Disk Settings] - Enable auto start - Default file system - Shutdown time-out - Tunable (nr_requests) - Tunable (md_write_methods) [Global SMART Settings] - Default SMART notification value
  11. If the partition table was improperly setup to begin with, this could very well be an issue though - am I wrong?
  12. Interesting, I just re-did as well and it worked as intended... I did notice that there was a difference on the space required for the filesystem and this went down from 72GB to 69GB on a 10TB drive, wonder if this was the issue...
  13. I could re-produce this at the cost of losing data on the array, I'll do a re-pro and post diagnostics.