NY152

Members
  • Content Count

    106
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

0 Neutral

About NY152

  • Rank
    Member
  • Birthday 02/10/4

Converted

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    At home

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. The argument regarding ransomware (this was still an example) is that if a ransonware attacks file encryption, the source of its files (the original therefore) is deleted in favor of the encrypted version, the recycle bin could be a rampart in the sense that we would recover the original! So limiting access to a defined user would make sense. Placing them elsewhere would perhaps be more logical if we listen to you (Samba rights) although I doubt it because, for example, on a Synology NAS, the recycle bin can be limited to only the administrators of the machine so the th
  2. For security reasons, it might be good to have the possibility to set the access authorization to the recycle bin to a single user (who will be considered as administrator (root for example) of the recycle bin) with which we will not connect by sharing. This would act as a safeguard in the event of compromised security (ransonware for example) You can also think about not storing the recycle bin in the share but in a place not accessible to the share !
  3. Hello, would it be possible to have an option to restrict access to the recycle bin to administrators only (or to selected users)?
  4. Hello, Almost 1 year since the release of the last stable version, it's been a long time. When will we have the privilege of seeing the arrival of v6.9 in stable version?
  5. Hello, I have walked through a little thread regarding accessing the recycle bin! It would be good to offer an option that automatically makes the trash folder and its contents completely inaccessible to the logged in user. Why ? For security purposes ! Imagine that the user is the victim of a virus or ransonware, the files in the recycle bin could save hours of work ^^ This is why the configuration of the recycle bin must be able to be configured (a bit like on Synology's DSM in short)
  6. Afin de fixer certains problèmes de droits dans mon serveur, j'ai tenté d'aller dans Tools > New Permissions Que je ne choisisse qu'un seul disque et / ou partage, j'ai ceci : Rien ne s'affiche, j'aimerai comprendre. J'ai beau laisser ce popup une éternité, rien ne s'y affiche et mes droits sont toujours aux fraises ... J'aimerai ne pas casser les droits de mes partages aussi si quelqu'un aurait la commande permettant de fixer tous les disques et tous les partages en SSH, je prends ^^ D'avancer, merci
  7. Hello, I am using ubooquity docker on my unRAID server and would like to add more directories. Only I don't know how to add more from the docker management interface. Could someone enlighten me? Thank you EDIT : Rights problem, resolved
  8. nginx crashes randomly. This can be found in /var/log/nginx/error.log # cat /var/log/nginx/error.log 2020/07/07 18:33:38 [emerg] 8029#8029: bind() to unix:/var/run/nginx.socket failed (98: Address already in use) 2020/07/07 18:33:38 [emerg] 8029#8029: bind() to 192.168.0.100:8081 failed (98: Address already in use) 2020/07/07 18:33:38 [emerg] 8029#8029: bind() to [2a01:e0a:2f6:9220::188b:5653]:8081 failed (98: Address already in use) 2020/07/07 18:33:38 [emerg] 8029#8029: bind() to unix:/var/run/nginx.socket failed (98: Address already in use) 2020/07/07 18:33:38 [emerg] 8029#
  9. So it works ... Almost! When I want to connect to it, I come back to the login page without error message (no bad login or other) Strange ...
  10. I found the problem, ngnix does not launch, it returns this error: nginx: [emerg] cannot load certificate "/etc/ssl/certs/unraid_bundle.pem": BIO_new_file() failed (SSL: error:02001002:system library:fopen:No such file or directory:fopen('/etc/ssl/certs/unraid_bundle.pem','r') error:2006D080:BIO routines:BIO_new_file:no such file) However, I have a certificate on the USB key. I am looking for ways to correct this error.
  11. Hello, After a long period of trouble, I reached my server and turned it back on a little later. Since then, everything seems to be working except the webgui. Even when starting on the webgui instead of the console, localhost does not work. Internet works, I type my message from the webgui ... Please help me correct this error.
  12. Hello, I hope I have posted the message in the correct category. I look for a box with at least 12 3.5' HDD bays for a new unRAID server. All the references that I find are no longer available or not deliverable in France. Anyone have a recent reference to advise me? Thank you in advance
  13. The fan works however ... I even have several fans and several sensors. The CPU does not exceed 40 ° C, same for my GPUs (the description of the config is in signature) I just restarted it and the server has been running normally for 15 minutes (a parity check has started, let's hope nothing untoward happens during this procedure, with 7 4 TB hard disks (including 2 for parity), it will not take 5 minutes! For the moment, the server is running but I leave the subject open because the situation is still strange and even if the situation seems resolved, it ma
  14. The BIOS beep is racing and I have this: general protection fault fffc [# 1] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 2] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 3] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 4] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 5] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 6] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 7] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 8] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 9] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 10] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 11] SMP PTI general protection fault: 0000 [# 12] SMP PTI general prote
  15. How to do this without losing the server configuration?