Roxedus

Community Developer
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    251

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Roxedus

  1. Roxedus
    Share the errors...
  2. Roxedus
    Despite the name change, it is for Organizr V2. Migration should be very easy, just replace the repository field to organizr/organizr. If you used another tag, see the migration note on how the get the same result. Support thread for the Official container for Organizr V2 DockerHub: https://hub.docker.com/r/organizr/organizr/ GitHub: https://github.com/Organizr/docker-organizr Discord: https://organizr.app/discord
  3. Roxedus
    The bwdata is the appdata folder.
  4. Roxedus
    Should be all
  5. Roxedus
    Its not in the CA yet. You should be able to just set the repository to organizr/organizr.
  6. Roxedus
    Only on buildtime, not runtime. A new image is now built, with the 5.0.1 version
  7. Roxedus
    Using radarr 3?
  8. Roxedus
    The password is hashed in the settings.json, your best bet is to reach out to the developers on github or trough discord
  9. Roxedus
    You need to add a variable with the key `OOKLA_EULA_GDPR` and set it to `true`. The i updated the template to account for this now.
  10. Roxedus
    wonder if it is your custom network doing some funky stuff, does it work with the default bridge?
  11. Roxedus
    Can you do post a screenshot of the settings for the container?
  12. Roxedus
    Yes, it is still working. Does the container log say "starting services"? Are you using the new port "6595"?
  13. Roxedus
    We have atleast 15 templates that are set up like this, and this is the first time i have heard it is being a "problem"
  14. Roxedus
    It's left empty for you to decide the port that should be exposed to the host, since port 80 is normally used by unraid itself.
  15. Roxedus
    That is already filled, the webserver runs on port 80 inside the container, map any port of your choosing, and it should work without you changing anything.
  16. Roxedus
    From my experience it goes back to the "not available" state when the auoupdater runs, doing a force update after enabling advanced view, shows it as up-to-date. This applies for all the images i use thats not from dockerhub
  17. Roxedus
    Pretty sure its because of the image not being from dockerhub
  18. Roxedus
    I asked the developer of the container to use a base that implements umask, i will update you on any development on my request
  19. Roxedus
    I just spun up a new instance of deemix and it went smooth. I also updated the template with the new repo, should be live soon. I dont know how it will treat old installations, @Squid should add a deprecating warning, telling people to use registry.gitlab.com/bockiii/deemix-docker instead of bocki/deemix
  20. Roxedus
    This has all the premium features, so yes, it does OTP
  21. Roxedus
    Pretty sure the scheme should be left as http
  22. Roxedus
    From the looks of it, no.
  23. Roxedus
    Looks like you skipped over the part about downloading the xml, then putting it on your array first.
  24. Roxedus
    overcome how? the application needs a mysql database connection.
  25. Roxedus
    @dmynerd78 Seems like you need redis5 with overleaf. there is a few issues on it, check out this issue.