Joly0

Members
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    167

  • Joined

  • Last visited

 Content Type 

Everything posted by Joly0

  1. Joly0
    @Marshalleq The command "zfs get xattr" returns "on" as value, so i assume its enabled like you mean? Although i dont remember setting that. @ich777The setting "Load ZFS Pools on Array start/stop:" in unraid-kernel-helper is set to false. I guess i should build a new kernel with it set to true, so the zfs array stops, when the unraid array does. But as i said, the reboot problems seems to only appear for me, when my system is pinned to 100% cpu-usage, otherwise i can normally reboot (atleast the times i tried, it worked)
  2. Joly0
    As said, its not working. I stopped the array, cant execute the command with the error message i already wrote. The zfs array btw doesnt get unmounted, when i stop the array in unraid like you described, it stays mounted and i can access it without a problem. The Docker container thats giving me problems is "mitchtalmadge/amp-dockerized"
  3. Joly0
    Ok ye, its only one specific docker container causing problems for me, although i have 0 idea why. When i start it, it pins most of my cpu cores too 100% and makes the whole server basically unusable.
  4. Joly0
    Yeah, as i said, i cant run that command, it gives me the error i wrote already. I figured, that my server runs fine, until i start a particular docker container (atleast it seems like it run fine), will test more.
  5. Joly0
    btw it definitly seems to be an issue with docker (or only some docker containers/volumes?), but when i disable docker, my servers cpu usage is normal, and i can reboot without a problem, but somehow, now i am unable to start docker. Will restart the server to see, if i can enable it afterwards again.
  6. Joly0
    @Marshalleq Stop the zfs array? If so, could you tell me the command to do it? If the normal Unraid array, then if i enter the command i get "cannot unmount "xxxx": unmount failed"
  7. Joly0
    I just built my own kernel using the kernel helper aswell, and for me everything seems to be working without a problem. I can reboot and the docker tab works aswell. EDIT: Ok, i have the same problems now aswell. Somehow my server is constantly peaked at 100% cpu usage, that might be the cause, why docker does not work correctly
  8. Joly0
    @steini84 zfs --version shows zfs-2.0.0-1 after deleting the old package and restarting the server. Is this the correct version? Didnt check the old version and github says it should be 2.0.1? Filename of the package is zfs-2.0.0-unraid-6.9.0-rc1.x86_x64.tgz so i think it didnt update, but why?
  9. Joly0
    And its not exactly writes, it has something to do with specific syscalls, idk, which changed from one Linux Kernel to the next and which seems to be needed with Lancache, but not with other containers or other writes.
  10. Joly0
    @Marshalleq On the Lancache Discord someone said it might be associated with this issue https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/issues/11151 Dont know exactly, if its really this, i hope its this, i will see when the zfs plugin its updated and i update again to RC2
  11. Joly0
    Did i miss something or when is the plugin uodated? A new Version came out 2 days ago https://github.com/openzfs/zfs/releases/tag/zfs-2.0.1 which should fix some problems with 6.9 RC2 and some Docker Containers (i wrote about my problem a few posts above and in the Discord server of the Containers, the problem got a bit more attention there). So would be good to get an update soon, so RC2 works without a problem.
  12. Joly0
    I dont know, if this is an issue with the rc2 or the zfs plugin, but i updated yesterday to rc2 and the plugin aswell and afterwards, my lancache container was no longer able to cache anything (write cached data to the zfs array). As soon as i downgraded to rc1 it worked perfectly again. Dont know where to post this, but here seems like a good starting point. If any additional information is needed, i try to provide that to investigate that problem.
  13. Joly0
    Just wanted to add, that my download speed is very slow aswell (1KBit/s at worst). Deutsche Telekom in Germany aswell. Additionally, downloading those files through a us proxy, for example from hidester.com results in way better download speeds.