As most know if they still use Krusader in a Docker it's pretty much dead now and not supported.  Does anyone have suggestions on a replacement, thanks....

7 hours ago, rharvey said:

As most know if they still use Krusader in a Docker it's pretty much dead now and not supported.  Does anyone have suggestions on a replacement, thanks....

It is still functional though for me in 6.9.2.

 

Not using it much anymore but what is your issue ? What feature is missing ?

You're pretty much right it does work mostly.  I just get a few lockups and failed launches but maybe 10% of the time so no big deal, thanks.

I've been using the built-in Midnight Commander (mc from the command line) since Unraid 4.7

9 hours ago, rharvey said:

You're pretty much right it does work mostly.  I just get a few lockups and failed launches but maybe 10% of the time so no big deal, thanks.

What container are you using?

Any updates on a replacement tower-to-tower transfer alternative? Krusader finally started crapping out on me (won’t even start now with a noVNC webutil.js error I can’t find any details for online, and MC doesn’t seem to want to see my separate server address for transfers between two separate hardware systems…

You can easily use MC

 

You just have the smb shares mounted via Unassigned Devices.

 

That all being said, 6.10 will have a File Manager (available as a plugin) which will do this also.  Personally, I prefer to use Windows. 

Good to know! My SMB speeds using Windows are usually a third or less than what Krusader was giving me, so the Unassigned Devices trick might be what I’m looking for, especially if I can just mount individual disks as a share with a little work (organizing setup is disk-dependent on one of the towers I regularly move new files onto).

SMB is absolutely ideal for management on the same server.  The interface (Explorer) every one already knows exactly how to use it, and the speed is identical to using Krusader / MC directly on the server (eg: for copying / moving files within the same server, the data never actually traverses the network, so you can quite easily hit the speeds of the drives and exceed the network line speed -> eg: copy files between my nvme's I can easily hit 700MB/s (7000 mbps) on a 1 gbps network.

 

Moving between servers however, stuff will get routed through the 3rd party which does have some overhead.

You must have a very special network to reach 7000 mbps = 7 gbps on a 1 gbps connection  

 

17 minutes ago, bonienl said:

You must have a very special network to reach 7000 mbps = 7 gbps on a 1 gbps connection  

 

You didn't read what I said.  SMB copies where the source and destination are the same server do not traverse the network.  Doesn't even need to be the same share so long as they're on the same server.  I can easily hit that rate on a 1G network copying over SMB between WD Black nvme's

Very quick test without even thinking about it:  

LOL was only looking at the last sentence. Sure internal copies can exceed the network speed  

 

On 10/27/2021 at 4:55 PM, rharvey said:

As most know if they still use Krusader in a Docker it's pretty much dead now and not supported.  Does anyone have suggestions on a replacement, thanks....

I use container by @ich777 everyday and it works great

New Unraid-User here,

 

I also have some issues with Krusader as I built my new server. I wanted to transfer data from my old QNAP via unassigned devices and mapped SMB-shares on Unraid.

After some time Krusader locked up the unassigned devices-shares und itself after a while. With MC there is are such issues.

Anyone have the same problems? I really liked Krusader

Edited May 27, 20224 yr by Storm

Unraid 6.10 supports Dynamix File Manager plugin 

I often use Spaceinvader One's Rootshare method with my dual pane FreeCommander from my Windows 10 machine.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bp8_4xRYOX4

 

The new Dynamix File Manager plugin looks damn convenient though.

Edited May 29, 20224 yr by peterg23

On 5/11/2022 at 3:40 AM, Squid said:

Very quick test without even thinking about it:  

I'm assuming this is a VM?

On 5/11/2022 at 1:33 AM, Squid said:

You didn't read what I said.  SMB copies where the source and destination are the same server do not traverse the network.  Doesn't even need to be the same share so long as they're on the same server.  I can easily hit that rate on a 1G network copying over SMB between WD Black nvme's

Interesting that you say this... In my experience, I have never reached that level of speed. When I move files using Krusader, the movement of files within the same UNRAID server is instantaneous. if I use SMB to move the same files, it will take multitude longer. It only copies at around 120MB/s.

 

Is there some kind of a problem with my configuration? What could be the issue? This is the main reason for me using Krusader to move files within UNRAID, simply because of the instantaneous nature. Am I missing something? Should I expect the same level of performance from using SMB?