-
[Support] ich777 - Application Dockers
I don't spin down the hard drives so I don't really have that problem. At first I was thinking in setting thumbnails and database in SSD cache and photos on array. This was because in photoprism requirements it says: "Indexing large photo and video collections significantly benefits from fast, local SSD storage and enough memory for caching." But maybe you also need the photos in the SSD to really benefit... Also I did not considered the thumbnail space, tomorrow I will check to see how much thumbnail space is required for X photos. I think it will be better to have both options (maybe add a disclaimer that to really use the storage path, then the user should add the variable PHOTOPRISM_STORAGE_PATH). I myself, always prefer to have the "media" locations and the "configuration" locations separated.
-
My New Dockers - Apache-PHP and Enhanced Calibre Server
Yes, I was saying only one file: "chown nobody:users file" But that will work also!
-
My New Dockers - Apache-PHP and Enhanced Calibre Server
It looks that the structure that it creates is owned by root. So try to chown some file to nobody:users and see if you can delete it?
-
[Support] ich777 - Application Dockers
Hello, I have been tried your photoprism container and so far love it. I have found a minor annoyance: The first parameter ("Data Dir" where generated files like cache and index ...) won't work unless you also pass the variable: PHOTOPRISM_STORAGE_PATH: /photoprism/storage If you don't pass that variable the storage with all cache, index and database will be created inside /photoprism/originals in a hidden folder called ".photoprism" Hopefully I have explained this correctly. Thanks again!
-
My New Dockers - Apache-PHP and Enhanced Calibre Server
Thank you!! Looks like a very complete template. I will try it this afternoon
-
My New Dockers - Apache-PHP and Enhanced Calibre Server
I don't think the photoprism container is configured correctly. Maybe orginals should be in /photoprism/originals and not in /originals?
-
jorge16 started following Preclear plugin , My New Dockers - Apache-PHP and Enhanced Calibre Server , Incorrect (annoying) Notifications about Disk Utilization and 1 other
-
[Support] Linuxserver.io - Lychee
Hello, Is there any intention to update the application? Version 4 was released on the 18th of April bringing new features and fixes. Currently latest version is 4.06: https://github.com/LycheeOrg/Lychee/releases Thanks for the work, I really like the containers you guys make.
-
Incorrect (annoying) Notifications about Disk Utilization
Done. Now warning is at 80 % (I figured I bump it a little bit as it was close to the limit) and critical is still at 90 % I will update this post if I receive the notifications or a couple days pass without notifications.
-
Weird disk utilization warning?
Another topic with the same problem:
-
Incorrect (annoying) Notifications about Disk Utilization
I am having this problem as well. My settings (global and for drive 2): Warning: 75 % Critical: 90 % Disk is sitting at 73 % Notifications are each day at ~6.47 AM and at ~21.42. Almost every day, some days only once. I have checked the dynamix.cfg and it has the same values as the gui. Hopefully someone can figure this one. Thanks.
-
[6.8.3] Custom Docker stuck on "Apply Update"
Thanks for the help.
-
[6.8.3] Custom Docker stuck on "Apply Update"
Hello, I created a docker with portainer because it was not available on unraid. Last week there was an update and I tried updating it with the "apply update" button but I got the following message: "Configuration not found. Was this container created using this plugin?". That makes sense as I did not use unraid to create the container, so I just updated it from portainer by pulling the latest image and the relaunching the container. Now the problem: The button still shows "apply update", and I have confirmed that the image was updated by checking the version of the application. Does anyone knows how to solve this? Or maybe it is a bug? Thanks for your time and help!
-
WireGuard quickstart
Hello, I am having trouble setting up wireguard. I have follow the guide in the blog but I can not connect to it. Furthermore doing a port scan on the unraid server shows that the port corresponding to wireguard is closed. If i run in terminal "wg show" it shows that wireguard is listening. I dont know what more to do to troubleshoot it. I have attached images for wireguard settings, network settings, port scan and the terminal output. I hope someone can help me, thanks!
-
Preclear plugin
Hello, first time using Preclear (well, first time using unraid). I am preclearing a disk (WD RED 4TB) and I was wondering if this is normal (the decrease in speed, now it is at 98 % with a speed of 87 MB/s): Mar 07 13:35:27 preclear_disk_WD-WCC7K5VD2F2P_28187: Pre-Read: progress - 10% read @ 181 MB/s Mar 07 14:12:22 preclear_disk_WD-WCC7K5VD2F2P_28187: Pre-Read: progress - 20% read @ 177 MB/s Mar 07 14:50:27 preclear_disk_WD-WCC7K5VD2F2P_28187: Pre-Read: progress - 30% read @ 171 MB/s Mar 07 15:30:10 preclear_disk_WD-WCC7K5VD2F2P_28187: Pre-Read: progress - 40% read @ 163 MB/s Mar 07 16:12:06 preclear_disk_WD-WCC7K5VD2F2P_28187: Pre-Read: progress - 50% read @ 153 MB/s Mar 07 16:56:43 preclear_disk_WD-WCC7K5VD2F2P_28187: Pre-Read: progress - 60% read @ 145 MB/s Mar 07 17:44:45 preclear_disk_WD-WCC7K5VD2F2P_28187: Pre-Read: progress - 70% read @ 133 MB/s Mar 07 18:37:33 preclear_disk_WD-WCC7K5VD2F2P_28187: Pre-Read: progress - 80% read @ 119 MB/s Mar 07 19:36:42 preclear_disk_WD-WCC7K5VD2F2P_28187: Pre-Read: progress - 90% read @ 104 MB/s if this is normal can somebody explain why? Thank you!
jorge16
Members
-
Joined
-
Last visited