Ademar

I've had the same problem. For me it doesn't work when I go to the Unraid UI, select qBittorrent and press WebUI. But if I just enter the IP/port manually it accepts the login.

This seems very nice. Is there a way to make Unraid notify via "agents" if it fails? Might need some official work to make third party notifications work? Edit: Nevermind, I see it actually works! 👏

I happened to check the status of my cache pool, which are 2x 500GB SSD in a mirror. To my surprise I found that it had discovered a few errors. pool: cache state: ONLINE status: One or more devices has experienced an unrecoverable error. An attempt was made to correct the error. Applications are unaffected. action: Determine if the device needs to be replaced, and clear the errors using 'zpool clear' or replace the device with 'zpool replace'. see: https://openzfs.github.io/openzfs-docs/msg/ZFS-8000-9P scan: scrub repaired 384K in 00:33:09 with 0 errors on Fri Nov 1 12:33:14 2024 config: NAME STATE READ WRITE CKSUM cache ONLINE 0 0 0 mirror-0 ONLINE 0 0 0 /dev/nvme0n1p1 ONLINE 3 0 0 /dev/sde1 ONLINE 0 0 0 errors: No known data errors I'm reading this as nvme0n1p1 had read errors, but the data was repaired due to the same bits being available on the other device in the mirror. If I clear the errors and don't see new ones, there is no reason to replace the disk? Why wasn't there a notification sent? I have enabled notification in Browser and Agents for all three notification levels. As you might notice the pool consists of one NVMe and one SATA SSD. I'm planning to replace them with two larger NVMe drives. What's the best method for doing that? replace one by one? will the usable space automatically expand?

Originally posted this as a separate thread, posting here as it's more relevant to the plugin. https://forums.unraid.net/topic/165486-no-permission-to-write-to-dataset/ I created a new share called "files", which is on my new ZFS pool. That created a dataset on the pool with the same name. With the ZFS Master plugin, I created a new dataset files/something. I can access both folders over SMB from Windows, but I don't have permission to write to files/something, only to "files". Is there a fix for this? or should I just avoid nesting datasets like this, and create "something" as it's own separate share instead?

There isn't really a permission to set on the dataset. I was expecting it to have the same permission as the share it lies in. Will make a post in the plugin support thread.

I created a new share called "files", which is on my new ZFS pool. That created a dataset on the pool with the same name. With the ZFS Master plugin, I created a new dataset files/something. I can access both folders over SMB from Windows, but I don't have permission to write to files/something, only to "files". Is there a fix for this? or should I just avoid nesting datasets like this, and create "something" as it's own seperate share instead?

There is absolutely no need for a template or to install this from "apps", Unraid is perfectly capable to run any docker container. Just go to docker, select "new container", use this repository: ghcr.io/borgbase/vorta-docker Map TCP port 5800 for the web UI, and map some folders.

I'm working on building a new pool with 4x 8TB drives in raidz1. As 2 of the drives are part of my current array, I need to be a bit creative in how I'll move the data over without having to buy any temporary drives. I'm making some changes to my existing array, this will need to stay alive while I build my ZFS pool and transfer the data. It will consist of 5x 4TB drives, one of them will be used as parity. 2 of these 4TB drives is 5 years old, and running perfectly fine. 2 of them are 10 years old, and haven't been used in 18 months. Am i crazy for using 10 year old drives? As long as I don't loose more than 1 drive during this whole process, I will be fine. I'll take some precautions, do preclear with verify, don't store anything precious on them, etc.

If you want to monitor a system with Wazuh, you either need to install the agent, or use the agentless monitoring capability. I really don't anything about that capability.

To make it easy for myself, I set up a dedicated Debian VM where I follow the official "Docker install" procedure. https://support.sandflysecurity.com/support/solutions/articles/72000078453-docker-image-install https://documentation.wazuh.com/current/deployment-options/docker/wazuh-container.html Wazuh AGENT as a docker container sounds like a terrible idea.

@InfInIty I've tried Sandfly, and that is able to scan Unraid over SSH. Some of the checks it's trying to do can't be completed, possibly due to Docker being used. But it does pass a lot of checks, and fail some. I also see there is an agentless mode to Wazuh, I haven't tried that yet.

Known issue https://info.linuxserver.io/issues/2023-11-22-qbittorrent/ To roll back, just press "Edit" on the docker container and add ":4.6.0" to the end of "Repository". https://hub.docker.com/r/linuxserver/qbittorrent/tags

Try opening it in incognito mode. If that works, you need to clear cookies/cache in your browser.

Can't find it under apps, maybe the template isn't being maintained anymore? The docker image is available on the repository ghcr.io/borgbase/vorta-docker

I'm in the habit of creating separate users for every device connecting to SMB on my server, and only giving the permissions that are necessary. I have an old user, "phone" that hasn't been used in over 6 months. After I upgraded 6.12.2 -> 6.12.3 I happened to run the "top" command to see which processes were running. To my surprise this "phone" user is running processes like mysqld, ruby, bundle and supervisord. This username has solely been used to give SMB access to the server, I really don't understand why that user is running any process on the server. Any ideas what's going on?