Everything posted by Camnomis
-
[Plugin] Mover Tuning
I have a pair of 1TB drives in a pool called "Protective Cache" this is showing as 100% used however inspecting the files on the pool it's only about 660GB used. There are three shares using this as Primary storage, with the generic "array" as secondly. Each drive has "Mover action" set to Protected-cache --> Array I have the Mover Tuning plug in installed and selected configuration items are: Only move if above this threshold of used Primary (cache) space: 80% Free down/prime up to this level of used Primary (cache) space: 80% Move files off Primary (cache) based on age? Yes Move files that are greater than this many days old: Auto Move All from Primary->Secondary (cache:yes) shares when disk is above a certain percentage: Yes Move All from Primary->Secondary shares pool percentage: 95% When I run Mover I get the following in the SystemLog: camnomis-unraid emhttpd: shcmd (99): /usr/local/sbin/mover |& logger -t move & camnomis-unraid root: Starting Mover camnomis-unraid root: ionice -c 2 -n 0 nice -n 0 /usr/local/emhttp/plugins/ca.mover.tuning/age_mover start camnomis-unraid move: *********************************************** Mover Tuning Plugin version version=2024.08.17.1225 ********************************************* camnomis-unraid move: Log Level: 1 Aug 17 14:53:48 camnomis-unraid move: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Global settings --------------------------------------------------------------- camnomis-unraid move: Using global moving threshold: 80 % camnomis-unraid move: Using global freeing threshold: 80 % camnomis-unraid move: Primary threshold to Move all Primary->Secondary shares to secondary: 95 % camnomis-unraid move: Age: Automatic (smart caching) Aug 17 14:53:48 camnomis-unraid move: ***************************************************************** FILTERING FILES *************************************************************** camnomis-unraid move: ------------------------------------------------------------ Processing appdata share ----------------------------------------------------------- camnomis-unraid move: Primary storage: protected-cache - size: 932GiB - used: 100 % (931GiB) camnomis-unraid move: Secondary storage: user0 camnomis-unraid move: Share Information: Name: appdata - Path: /mnt/protected-cache/appdata camnomis-unraid move: Moving threshold: 80% (746GiB) ; Freeing threshold: 80% (746GiB) camnomis-unraid move: Mover action: protected-cache->user0 (cache:yes). Move All from Primary->Secondary shares option is selected and pool is above move all threshold percentage: 100% > 95%. camnomis-unraid move: => Moving all files from protected-cache to user0 camnomis-unraid move: Updated Filtered filelist: /tmp/ca.mover.tuning/Filtered_files_2024-08-17T145348.list for appdata camnomis-unraid move: ************************************************************ ANALYSING MOVING ACTIONS *********************************************************** camnomis-unraid move: Deciding the action (move/sync/keep) for each file. There are 130007 files, it can take a while... camnomis-unraid move: No new files will be moved/synced from primary to secondary camnomis-unraid move: No new files will be moved/synced from secondary to primary camnomis-unraid move: Cleaning lock and stop files camnomis-unraid move: ****************************************************************** WE ARE DONE ! **************************************************************** I have quickly exhausted my ability to try and work out what is going on, can someone please help with where I should start looking for a resolution.
-
Utlisation showing more in WebUI than on the command line.
Thanks, will do
-
Utlisation showing more in WebUI than on the command line.
I have a pair of 1TB drives in a pool called "Protective Cache" this is showing as 100% used however inspecting the files on the pool it's only about 660GB used. There are three shares using this as Primary storage, with the generic "array" as secondly. Each drive has "Mover action" set to Protected-cache --> Array I have the Mover Tuning plug in installed and selected configuration items are: Only move if above this threshold of used Primary (cache) space: 80% Free down/prime up to this level of used Primary (cache) space: 80% Move files off Primary (cache) based on age? Yes Move files that are greater than this many days old: Auto Move All from Primary->Secondary (cache:yes) shares when disk is above a certain percentage: Yes Move All from Primary->Secondary shares pool percentage: 95% When I run Mover I get the following in the SystemLog: camnomis-unraid emhttpd: shcmd (99): /usr/local/sbin/mover |& logger -t move & camnomis-unraid root: Starting Mover camnomis-unraid root: ionice -c 2 -n 0 nice -n 0 /usr/local/emhttp/plugins/ca.mover.tuning/age_mover start camnomis-unraid move: *********************************************** Mover Tuning Plugin version version=2024.08.17.1225 ********************************************* camnomis-unraid move: Log Level: 1 Aug 17 14:53:48 camnomis-unraid move: ----------------------------------------------------------------- Global settings --------------------------------------------------------------- camnomis-unraid move: Using global moving threshold: 80 % camnomis-unraid move: Using global freeing threshold: 80 % camnomis-unraid move: Primary threshold to Move all Primary->Secondary shares to secondary: 95 % camnomis-unraid move: Age: Automatic (smart caching) Aug 17 14:53:48 camnomis-unraid move: ***************************************************************** FILTERING FILES *************************************************************** camnomis-unraid move: ------------------------------------------------------------ Processing appdata share ----------------------------------------------------------- camnomis-unraid move: Primary storage: protected-cache - size: 932GiB - used: 100 % (931GiB) camnomis-unraid move: Secondary storage: user0 camnomis-unraid move: Share Information: Name: appdata - Path: /mnt/protected-cache/appdata Aug 17 14:53:48 camnomis-unraid move: Moving threshold: 80% (746GiB) ; Freeing threshold: 80% (746GiB) Aug 17 14:53:48 camnomis-unraid move: Mover action: protected-cache->user0 (cache:yes). Move All from Primary->Secondary shares option is selected and pool is above move all threshold percentage: 100% > 95%. Aug 17 14:53:48 camnomis-unraid move: => Moving all files from protected-cache to user0 Aug 17 14:53:48 camnomis-unraid move: Updated Filtered filelist: /tmp/ca.mover.tuning/Filtered_files_2024-08-17T145348.list for appdata camnomis-unraid move: ************************************************************ ANALYSING MOVING ACTIONS *********************************************************** camnomis-unraid move: Deciding the action (move/sync/keep) for each file. There are 130007 files, it can take a while... camnomis-unraid move: No new files will be moved/synced from primary to secondary camnomis-unraid move: No new files will be moved/synced from secondary to primary camnomis-unraid move: Cleaning lock and stop files camnomis-unraid move: ****************************************************************** WE ARE DONE ! **************************************************************** I have quickly exhausted my ability to try and work out what is going on, can someone please help with where I should start looking for a resolution>
-
Dynamix File Manager
I have been pointed to this plugin from Fix Common Problems, as I have some shares which are set to be protected but files / folders exist on unprotected pool. I have installed and read the Dynamix File Manager PDF but I can't see where this plugin will help with my problem, as the move files only allows me to move things between shares not pools. Am I missing something obvious?
-
Can't stop my array
Thanks, that worked and the raid is being rebuilt now
-
Can't stop my array
I can reboot from the GUI, it just gets to the same stage where I can spin everything down but it won't let me stop the array
-
Can't stop my array
Had a series of power cuts and I am now suffering the consequences, the system is two parity disks and three data disks. The server has rebooted and all VM's/dockers etc are working. However one parity disk and one data disk is showing an error "device is disabled, contents emulated" Both pass SMART tests but I can't stop the array to try and replace the disks, or rebuild over them, as I get a constant error "ARARRY STOPPING; RETRY UNMOUNTING DISK SHARE" How would I go about resolving this?
-
[Support] IBRACORP - All images and files
Scrap that, looks like it was a bug that has been fixed in 4.36.1 https://github.com/authelia/authelia/issues/3621 Guess I will have to wait until the image is updated
-
[Support] IBRACORP - All images and files
Looks like a recent update has broke something in the configuration.yml, when I try to start Authelia I get the following error message Has anyone else looked at this yet, or do I need to dive into the change logs
-
[Support] Linuxserver.io - Nextcloud
Me again, has anyone installed Full text search Full text search - Elasticsearch Platform Full text search - Files I am getting mixed messages if it need to be installed as just the three apps listed or if it needs a whole seperate docker container etc.
-
[Support] Linuxserver.io - Nextcloud
I have Nextcloud setup, and I think it's working, however the unraid share that I have allocated to the docker container seems to be completly open for all nextcloud accounts, anything in someones nextcloud can be viewed by anyone who has access to the share? Is this by design?
-
[Support] Linuxserver.io - Nextcloud
Is anyone using Nextcloud and Authelia? I have Authelia setup so that when ever I access on an internal network it bypassess login, when I am away I need to login with 2FA, this all works perfectly when I use Nextloud through the webclient but I'd like to see if it's possible to bypass authelia when logging in with a mobile client or similar. For other services like Valutwarden I could configure authelia to bypass any requests coming via an API but it looks like the Nextcloud app is just a skinned version of the webinterface as everything seems to be requesting the standard URLs for access. I know Nextcloud has the ability to have its own 2FA but for ease I would prefer to use Authelia as that has already been configured with LDAP as has Nextcloud. Is what I am asking for possible?
-
[Support] IBRACORP - All images and files
Hello, I have Authelia and Freeipa working nicely, the only thing I can't seem to work out is what would be the best way to handle password resets? Most of my users will be outside the network so will have to come through authelia to authenticate, but although the forgot password option on authelia seems to send out a reset request to their email address the logs show this then a reset is tried: Is it possible to reset an LDAP password through Authelia? EDIT: Ignore that, had to change from ldap to ldaps in the configuration.yml
-
Best solution for internal DNS
I know this should technically be posted in Application Support but forgive me as I didn’t want to limit myself to posting in the docker, plug-in or VM forum and pre judge a solution without exploring all the options. I have a pretty basic set up, UNRAID with a mix of VMs and Docker applications, including Nginx and Authelia so the applications are available from the internet. With Authelia I have 2FA set up and it works fine, no problems what so ever. However my Authelia config is such that anyone on an internal network doesn’t need 2FA, again this works fine however there is a small situation where if internally I use the IP address it bypasses 2FA but if I use the url configured in the proxy it asks for 2FA. I know this happens because the CNAMEs are all configured in Cloudflare so any requests goes to them and then comes back into my network via the public IP from my ISP so is not considered to be internal. I know I can get round this by updating local host files to point to the NPS address rather, and this works a great, however this workaround isn’t available on mobile devices etc, so I need something to handle the internal DNS, but looking at the options they are all way too complicated for my limited understanding, ideally I’d like something similar to the Cloudflare solution with a simple GUI to allow me to add half a dozen addresses and their respective internal IP address. Can anyone recommend a solution?
-
Aplogies for the very basic question....
Awesome! I am making my own life difficult but having an unraid share connected to a VM, and then sharing a folder as a network share from the VM to another machine!
-
Aplogies for the very basic question....
But can a single unraid share be presented to more than one VM so they can both access the share at the same time?
-
[Support] Nginx Proxy Manager (NPM) Official
Thanks for the help in this thread, I’ve got NPM with Authelia for 2FA and I’m really happy with the set up, only a small niggle is that when I try to access the UNRAID host via an NPM address it’s coming up with a 502 bad gateway, I can access via IP so I’m guessing it’s something in NPM which is causing the issue.
-
[Support] IBRACORP - All images and files
Secondly What would I do for these entries in the Endpoint Config for a service I am using which is not containerised? set $upstream_CONTAINERNAME $forward_scheme://$server:$port; proxy_pass $upstream_CONTAINERNAME;
-
[Support] IBRACORP - All images and files
Hey, I've got Autheia up and running with a bit of swearing over the config file, but I got there in the end. I have an access control list set up so internal network connections do not need to authenticate, and external do, it all works beautifully! Until I try to switch from one_factor to two _factor When I log in and authenticate I am presented with the the one time password splash screen and am invited to register my first device, but I can't do so as when I click on the link I get a Checking the logs its trying to connect to /api/secondfactor/totp/identity/start Is there something I have forgotten to install?
-
[Support] Nginx Proxy Manager (NPM) Official
As an aside, how secure is the access lists feature? Obviously if I use user name / password it's only as strong as the password I provide, but is IP restriction enough? Is there any way to improve on the basic security of NPM with 2FA?
-
[Support] Nginx Proxy Manager (NPM) Official
It brings up the splash page, when I update my local host file to the NPM it works, so I am guessing the problem lies with my router, I have a pfSense one on order so that might fix it, but I think I can say NPM Is configured and working as it should
-
[Support] Nginx Proxy Manager (NPM) Official
Scrap that! It seems to work from when I am accessing the urls from outside my network, but just not while I am at home.
-
[Support] Nginx Proxy Manager (NPM) Official
This site can’t be reached xxx.xxx.xxx.xxx took too long to respond. Try: Checking the connection Checking the proxy and the firewall ERR_CONNECTION_TIMED_OUT
-
[Support] Nginx Proxy Manager (NPM) Official
Thanks, if I run the curl from the console I get "HTTP/1.1 200 OK" which is good, however when I try to connect on the url I get chromes "ERR_CONNECTION_TIMED_OUT" As it stands I have: dns for subdomain.domain.com to my public IP two port forwarding rules on my router for port 80 and 443 to the IP of the NPM container (i have changed the IP on unraid from port 80 to allow NPM to have it) When I connect to the NPM with both http and https I get the correct splash page Within NPM I have a Proxy Host Details Domain Name: subdomain.domain.com Scheme: http Forward Hostname / IP: 172.16.1.1 Forward Port: 8181 Cache Assets: Off Block Common Exploits: On Websockets Support: Off Access List: Publicly Accessible Custom Locations None SSL SSL Certificate: subdomain.domain.com Force SSL: On HTTP/2 Support: On HSTS Enabled: Off HSTS Subdomains: Off Advanced None When I run curl -sSL -D - http://172.16.1.1:8181 -o /dev/null I get the following response HTTP/1.1 303 See Other Content-Type: text/html;charset=utf-8 Server: CherryPy/unknown Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 15:58:50 GMT Location: http://172.16.1.1:8181/home Vary: Accept-Encoding Content-Length: 100 HTTP/1.1 200 OK Content-Type: text/html;charset=utf-8 Server: CherryPy/unknown Date: Thu, 03 Feb 2022 15:58:50 GMT Vary: Accept-Encoding Content-Length: 68695 I thought maybe its a port issue, so I have added a port forward rule on the router for 8181 but this doesn't fix it (I assume the port number is handled by NPM but was running out of ideas!)
-
Adding M.2 capability….
I read up a little on that, and the CPU lanes are only really important for a GPU (which I am not using in my box) and storage should be fine on PCH? I only have one SATA drive and thats connected to the backplate and the HBA and a single NIC with two ports