Everything posted by Querzion
-
NAS + unRAID?
I'm in the process of getting really really irritated with my computer, I thought it was a good Idea to have my computer run unRAID, and it worked fine till the new hard drive just failed royally, and I can't take it out of the system, because then unRAID won't start up properly. I'm so tired of this, and it's going to cost 2000 € to get the data back MAYBE, so I'm not really super happy about anything atm. So instead of using my 2000+ € computer as a NAS, why not buy a NAS and then put unRAID on it. . . WHICH NAS THOUGH?! Can I just buy any existing NAS that has like 6/8 bays and then let that stand somewhere where it doesn't make much sound... I no longer want to sit in Linux through a VM, but I still want to have dockers and stuff going, but not on my main computer. I'm a bit tired of that, and not being able to use all hardware etc. Recommendations for commercial NAS devices that unRAID works on wouldn't really hurt, so please throw a bunch of names, nothing too expensive, and hopefully not something that is unknown.
-
Did my harddrive just die?
Is it too late to save it? Or rather is it too late to save whats on it? Because most stuff on it is really important that I get my hands on again. I'm glad that my password database was accessible still, otherwise I would have probably died there and then.
-
Did my harddrive just die?
-
Did my harddrive just die?
-
Did my harddrive just die?
I was watching a movie, and in the middle of it I got an error message, then folders just vanished from the shares. What's going on here? Did one of my drives just die?
-
When will there be a newer kernel build?
I know the current official kernel build was a great update, I however am not using 5 year old hardware, I had recently bought the AM5 platform ( AMD 7900X ) and that's what I have been using since, the 'newer' kernels that have been released from 6.10+ have to my comprehension better compatibility with newer hardware, and 6.14 got some interesting updated too. I have been a GNU/Linux user since about 24 years back, but I'm a casual user, I never dived into the whole switching to kernels or building my own, I started of using Slackware, and ended up using Debian based distro's, now I jump between Ubuntu Derivatives, Fedora or Arch. I have had lots of bad luck when it comes to tinkering with the Kernel myself, so I more or less stopped tinkering with Linux as a whole because of a lot of unwanted crashes etc, so nowadays I just wait for a stable release, It's easy to just install a new VM to sit in, but in the back of my head I'm still thinking, the host system has an old kernel, and everything goes through that kernel, regardless of if I have made passthroughs or not. So I'm wondering when unRAID will have their next big kernel update, is there a lot of work patching it to work with unRAID, or is there a guide that takes babysteps in how to not crash your unRAID install and upgrade your kernel to a newer? I haven't used Slackware in ages, and if I have comprehended it right, unRAID is based on Slack. I just don't think it's the most intelligent option for me to just try and update the kernel myself, if I want a stable and reliable system.
-
Swedish
Nope, jag satt med det där, det mesta är översatt, det saknas några översättningar och sen är det några saker som ska ändras, hade gärna sett att det varit annorlunda filer dock, som en databas med ord istället för en massa text dokument. Spenderade ett dygn totalt på att översätta det mesta förra sommaren. Jag använde delvis ChatGPT, men man är tvungen att gå över varenda rad, och dubbelkolla översättningen, den ligger redan uppe, om det är något textstycke som anses vara fel i perspektivtycke eller annat så är det bara att skriva vart det är och vad som står där och vad som möjligen borde stå där. Så kanske jag kan ta och köra en ny revision på översättningen när det finns tid till övers. Pluggar Webutveckling så har inte jätte mycket tid till övers. Location: What it says: What the translation should state:
-
Windows 10/11 VM ("ACPI BIOS ERROR")
Noticed, but some are quite obvious though, named "migratable='on'", which can only be the cpu or gpu & audio, in the long xml, there's 2-4 of those.
-
Windows 10/11 VM ("ACPI BIOS ERROR")
I created a new VM, and didn't share anything else but the harddrive, so I'm using this VM through a browser window. <?xml version='1.0' encoding='UTF-8'?> <domain type='kvm' id='2'> <name>Windows 11</name> <uuid>4e2cb08a-01fd-ad6e-a62a-8e0f5195eb80</uuid> <metadata> <vmtemplate xmlns="unraid" name="Windows 11" icon="windows11.png" os="windowstpm" webui="" storage="default"/> </metadata> <memory unit='KiB'>33554432</memory> <currentMemory unit='KiB'>33554432</currentMemory> <memoryBacking> <nosharepages/> <source type='memfd'/> <access mode='shared'/> </memoryBacking> <vcpu placement='static'>16</vcpu> <cputune> <vcpupin vcpu='0' cpuset='4'/> <vcpupin vcpu='1' cpuset='16'/> <vcpupin vcpu='2' cpuset='5'/> <vcpupin vcpu='3' cpuset='17'/> <vcpupin vcpu='4' cpuset='6'/> <vcpupin vcpu='5' cpuset='18'/> <vcpupin vcpu='6' cpuset='7'/> <vcpupin vcpu='7' cpuset='19'/> <vcpupin vcpu='8' cpuset='8'/> <vcpupin vcpu='9' cpuset='20'/> <vcpupin vcpu='10' cpuset='9'/> <vcpupin vcpu='11' cpuset='21'/> <vcpupin vcpu='12' cpuset='10'/> <vcpupin vcpu='13' cpuset='22'/> <vcpupin vcpu='14' cpuset='11'/> <vcpupin vcpu='15' cpuset='23'/> </cputune> <resource> <partition>/machine</partition> </resource> <os> <type arch='x86_64' machine='pc-q35-9.1'>hvm</type> <loader readonly='yes' type='pflash'>/usr/share/qemu/ovmf-x64/OVMF_CODE-pure-efi-tpm.fd</loader> <nvram>/etc/libvirt/qemu/nvram/4e2cb08a-01fd-ad6e-a62a-8e0f5195eb80_VARS-pure-efi-tpm.fd</nvram> <boot dev='hd'/> </os> <features> <acpi/> <apic/> <hyperv mode='custom'> <relaxed state='on'/> <vapic state='on'/> <spinlocks state='on' retries='8191'/> <vpindex state='on'/> <synic state='on'/> <stimer state='on'/> <vendor_id state='on' value='none'/> </hyperv> </features> <cpu mode='host-passthrough' check='none' migratable='on'> <topology sockets='1' dies='1' clusters='1' cores='8' threads='2'/> <cache mode='passthrough'/> <feature policy='require' name='topoext'/> </cpu> <clock offset='localtime'> <timer name='hpet' present='no'/> <timer name='hypervclock' present='yes'/> </clock> <on_poweroff>destroy</on_poweroff> <on_reboot>restart</on_reboot> <on_crash>restart</on_crash> <devices> <emulator>/usr/local/sbin/qemu</emulator> <disk type='file' device='cdrom'> <driver name='qemu' type='raw'/> <source file='/mnt/user/archive.data/ISOs/virtio-win-0.1.262-2.iso' index='1'/> <backingStore/> <target dev='hdb' bus='sata'/> <readonly/> <alias name='sata0-0-1'/> <address type='drive' controller='0' bus='0' target='0' unit='1'/> </disk> <controller type='sata' index='0'> <alias name='ide'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x1f' function='0x2'/> </controller> <controller type='pci' index='0' model='pcie-root'> <alias name='pcie.0'/> </controller> <controller type='pci' index='1' model='pcie-root-port'> <model name='pcie-root-port'/> <target chassis='1' port='0x8'/> <alias name='pci.1'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x01' function='0x0' multifunction='on'/> </controller> <controller type='pci' index='2' model='pcie-root-port'> <model name='pcie-root-port'/> <target chassis='2' port='0x9'/> <alias name='pci.2'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x01' function='0x1'/> </controller> <controller type='pci' index='3' model='pcie-root-port'> <model name='pcie-root-port'/> <target chassis='3' port='0xa'/> <alias name='pci.3'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x01' function='0x2'/> </controller> <controller type='pci' index='4' model='pcie-root-port'> <model name='pcie-root-port'/> <target chassis='4' port='0xb'/> <alias name='pci.4'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x01' function='0x3'/> </controller> <controller type='pci' index='5' model='pcie-root-port'> <model name='pcie-root-port'/> <target chassis='5' port='0xc'/> <alias name='pci.5'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x01' function='0x4'/> </controller> <controller type='virtio-serial' index='0'> <alias name='virtio-serial0'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x03' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/> </controller> <controller type='usb' index='0' model='qemu-xhci' ports='15'> <alias name='usb'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x07' function='0x0'/> </controller> <filesystem type='mount' accessmode='passthrough'> <driver type='virtiofs' queue='1024'/> <binary path='/usr/libexec/virtiofsd' xattr='on'> <cache mode='always'/> <sandbox mode='chroot'/> </binary> <source dir='/mnt/user/archive.vms'/> <target dir='archive.vms'/> <alias name='fs0'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x01' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/> </filesystem> <interface type='bridge'> <mac address='52:54:00:ba:2d:60'/> <source bridge='br0'/> <target dev='vnet1'/> <model type='virtio-net'/> <alias name='net0'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x02' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/> </interface> <serial type='pty'> <source path='/dev/pts/1'/> <target type='isa-serial' port='0'> <model name='isa-serial'/> </target> <alias name='serial0'/> </serial> <console type='pty' tty='/dev/pts/1'> <source path='/dev/pts/1'/> <target type='serial' port='0'/> <alias name='serial0'/> </console> <channel type='unix'> <source mode='bind' path='/run/libvirt/qemu/channel/2-Windows 11/org.qemu.guest_agent.0'/> <target type='virtio' name='org.qemu.guest_agent.0' state='connected'/> <alias name='channel0'/> <address type='virtio-serial' controller='0' bus='0' port='1'/> </channel> <input type='tablet' bus='usb'> <alias name='input0'/> <address type='usb' bus='0' port='1'/> </input> <input type='mouse' bus='ps2'> <alias name='input1'/> </input> <input type='keyboard' bus='ps2'> <alias name='input2'/> </input> <tpm model='tpm-tis'> <backend type='emulator' version='2.0' persistent_state='yes'/> <alias name='tpm0'/> </tpm> <graphics type='vnc' port='5901' autoport='yes' websocket='5701' listen='0.0.0.0' sharePolicy='ignore'> <listen type='address' address='0.0.0.0'/> </graphics> <audio id='1' type='none'/> <video> <model type='qxl' ram='65536' vram='65536' vgamem='16384' heads='1' primary='yes'/> <alias name='video0'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x00' slot='0x1e' function='0x0'/> </video> <hostdev mode='subsystem' type='pci' managed='yes'> <driver name='vfio'/> <source> <address domain='0x0000' bus='0x04' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/> </source> <alias name='hostdev0'/> <address type='pci' domain='0x0000' bus='0x04' slot='0x00' function='0x0'/> </hostdev> <watchdog model='itco' action='reset'> <alias name='watchdog0'/> </watchdog> <memballoon model='none'/> </devices> <seclabel type='dynamic' model='dac' relabel='yes'> <label>+0:+100</label> <imagelabel>+0:+100</imagelabel> </seclabel> </domain> I wonder, will the xml file add 35 pci inputs just by adding the gpu to it?
-
Windows 10/11 VM ("ACPI BIOS ERROR")
I made a copy of the XML on pastebin. It declares like 35 PCI ports, and I have no Idea which ones I can delete and not. https://pastebin.com/xUZiVEfN
-
Windows 10/11 VM ("ACPI BIOS ERROR")
Ohh. I will have to check on that when I got the time for it. I saw that there were a lot of such statements in the xml file and naturally wondered if it was right, but now it seems confirmed. Thanks for the hint.
-
Passthrough of a New "Kingston Renegade 2TB" drive. How do I do it?
I switched the drive with the 1TB one that is in group 1 in the picture, and it resulted in freedom. 😜 I'm currently using it for a POP!_OS VM.
-
unRAID v7b4 - Shares Access Denied through Windows.
It works again. "/ I have never had so much problems with the shares as I have had since switching to v7b4.
-
unRAID v7b4 - Shares Access Denied through Windows.
-
unRAID v7b4 - Shares Access Denied through Windows.
WHAT THE F IS WRONG WITH UNRAID?!? I gain access to the shares, and when I go one folder deeper into them, this happens, with some of them. It's not moved or deleted. I changed the case-sensitive setting from Auto to force-lower.
-
Passthrough of a New "Kingston Renegade 2TB" drive. How do I do it?
I just got myself an extra drive that i thought would be easy to pass through to a new VM, but it ended up in a strange group, how do I change this? Is it something that I can change around somewhere so I can pass it through, or what should I do?
-
Windows 10/11 VM ("ACPI BIOS ERROR")
There are two ACPI settings in the bios, it's the _CST C1 declaration, and the SRAT L3 Cache as NUMA domain, and I now have them both set to disabled, and the error persists. It's starting to get on my nerves, because I had the windows vm's working on my old stick, so I wonder what's different. "/ The bios is also up to date.
-
unRAID v7b4 - Shares Access Denied through Windows.
Stop Array, Stop SMB, Start Array, Stop Array, Start SMB, Start Array. It works.
-
Windows 10/11 VM ("ACPI BIOS ERROR")
This is the settings I want it to be. Which ends in this error, and I got so tired of trying to fix this some months back, that I changed the CPU to Emulated like this. That was NOT the right answer to this problem, While I can use the VM, (Proven by me writing this in that one VM), but I can't start games, if I do Steam crashes, and I can't install extensions to Visual Studio, which makes it unbearable to use Windows in it's current state, since I have to reboot into the m.2 stick, reset the pin, login on multiple platforms, then start VS and install the extensions, and then reboot into unRAID again. Also I have started having other problems, where the SMB server isn't read in correctly and I lose access to the shared folders. "/ Not sure if that has anything to do with it, or if it's a unRAID-v7b2-4 issue. My VM's worked properly up until I re-installed unRAID to a new USB. That's when everything just broke down, and I got help 1½ years ago to start windows 10/11 VM's with some XML fixes that I don't remember anything about. "/
-
unRAID v7b4 - Shares Access Denied through Windows.
I have a total access denied, from nowhere, I deleted the credentials, and stopped the array, changed to no, then yes and started the array again and it did not work. "/
-
unRAID v7b4 - Shares Access Denied through Windows.
I shut down the array, and changed the SMB setting to share no, then share yes (workgroup), and now it works again.
-
unRAID v7b4 - Shares Access Denied through Windows.
I just updated to v7b4, and in order to open things, like well anything really on the internet I need access to the shares, which i haven't hade problems with before today, other then on my friends computer, but he didn't really care and don't actively use the shares as I do. When I try to gain access to the server this message pops up. When I diagnose it it looks like this. I thought it would be a credentials thing, so I went along with the ChatGPT response and tried this. Removing the old credentials did not help at all. Next is to try and reset the network I suppose. "/ Oh, yeah, the details states this btw. This has to be an unRAID problem, because it was working flawlessly for me from day one of using it up until today.
-
Space issues & Cache.
I will test this as soon as the manual move is done.
-
Space issues & Cache.
I'm moving the files manually instead.
-
Space issues & Cache.
The array is running, otherwise I wouldn't be able to write you now, since I'm on a VM.