Ansem

Hi everyone, I have most of my stack created by a docker compose so that the traffic will go trhough gluetun VPN. The issue is that Prowlarr seems unable to contact Flaresolverr even if FS started fine. There is some way to make Flamesolverr works while using Gluetun?

Una piccola nota per chi come me aveva giá un bot e non riceve le notifiche: bisogna comunque mandare /start anche se il bot é attivo e funzionante Even if you have a bot already working you have to send the /start in the bot chat. Otherwise it won't work

it's both about OCD and avoid spun up if possible 😅

Thanks for the ansewr! If I exclude disk1,2 and 3 I think it will apply split level and allocation method to "small folders" too right? If possibile I would prefer them to keep all files on the disk I put them. Basically I only want the big folders to be split on disk4,5 while keeping small folders to remain where they are now even if I add new files to them

Hi everyone, I have my data all in one share and since It was getting full i had to add 2 disks. I would like to use this new disks only for some folders. I have multiple smaller folder (under 1TB), 3 big folder(over 1TB) and the download folder. The smaller folders are fine, but I would like to use the new disks only for the 3 big folders and the download one. Basically this is my configuration: What I want my configuration to be is Is it possibile to do it? I was thinking to use high-water and with "manual split level". I would have to create folders in disk 4 and 5 but then I think it should split it like I tried to describe right?

I was finally able to install it with update to unraid 7.1.2! Thanks a lot for the software! finally I can manage all my fans based on HDD temperature!

I can just install the new version, it's not an issue it just depends if you prefer to keep the docker hub release or the github one

Hi, I'm on unraid 7.0.1 and I tried to install the IT87 driver since I have gigabyte b860m Eagle for my intel ultra 235 . Even after installing and installing it the fan controller won't appear in dynamix fan controller Do I have to wait for the unraid 7.1 update or should I open a ticket in the IT87 github page?

Tha's fine, I want unraid to balance the new files of those selected folders only, and to place them only the new hard disks. The old ones will remain in the current disks

Yeah, I wanted to uderstand better the split level. 1) If I set High-water and Split level "manual" what will happen if I create a folder manually on disk4? It will balance it? 2) Otherwise it's possible to apply split level only on some folder?

Hi everyone, I have 3 huge folders, one on each disk. Now I've added two other disks. I would like to have those 3 folders to be split on those 2 disks based on high-water. So basically this is how I would like to have my folders. I also added a detail for where I would like to have files disk 1 -> huge folder 1, random folders |_ Weddings 1 -> all files of weddings 1 are on disk 1 disk 2 -> huge folder 2, random folders disk 3 -> huge folder 3, random folders disk 4-> huge folder 1,2,3 |_ Weddings 2 -> all files of weddings 2 are on disk 4 disk 5 -> huge folder 1,2,3 |_ Weddings 3 -> all files of weddings 3 are on disk 5 it's possible to do that? if so, how?

Hi everyone, I wanted to use mover tuning mostly to keep 3 folders always on the cache SSD. It's possible to set up that it will sync only those 3 folder and that it will move all the others? I would like the document folder to always be on the SSD so that read times are improved, but the Download folder can be moved to array at night for example

I found it in this reddit thread:

Yeah, I found out a few minutes later that the 10 sata ports has a sata multiplier. Sadly I had to pull the trigger on the 6 port ASM1166 because of the shipping timing. Also I read that LSI 9300 prevent the PC to go into sleep/hibernation. Is it true?

Hi everyone, I need to buy a new expansion card for my server and I need at least 6 sata ports, 8 would be better. I ended up selecting those two for the price and shipping times: - SAS CARD: https://www.amazon.it/Internal-Controller-Broadcoms-Compatible-9300-8I/dp/B07VV91L61?__mk_it_IT=ÅMÅŽÕÑ&crid=3LQ1OAPL4VDU7&s=pc&sprefix=lsi%2B9300%2Ccomputers%2C113&sr=1-4&ufe=app_do%3Aamzn1.fos.9d4f9b77-768c-4a4e-94ad-33674c20ab35&th=1 I would also need to buy the cables, so it would be 130€ total. This are the cables: https://www.amazon.it/10Gtek-interno-SFF-8087-maschio-femminile/dp/B01L8ATGAA?__mk_it_IT=ÅMÅŽÕÑ&crid=2F9MV6JOPLNWE&sprefix=cavo%2Bmini%2Bsas%2Caps%2C148&sr=8-5&th=1 I selected the ones without locking latches since they are usually more damage than usefull - SATA CARD: https://www.amazon.it/dp/B08L7W8QFT?th=1 Considering that the cables are included it would be 50€. I won't plan to connect SSDs to the expansion card, I wanted to connect them to the motherboard directly. Which one would you suggest to buy? Are SAS card really that better than normal sata?