Jump to content

SpaceInvaderOne

Community Developer
  • Posts

    1,747
  • Joined

  • Days Won

    30

Everything posted by SpaceInvaderOne

  1. What are your thread pairings? As you have 2 cpus i would isolate all cores/threads from cpu 2 the assign that whole physical cpu to the vm then pin the emulator pin to a core on the first cpu.
  2. Its because sometimes the cpu isnt detected correctly so the qemu can sometimes be better in this case. What cpu do you have? edit.....ok see you have 2 2670 xeons. what are your cpu thread pairings
  3. Try changing cpu type to qemu64. I remember reading some people have got better performance with this sometimes?
  4. Wow thanks Squid, awesome im very happy! :D
  5. Away from computer for a couple of days but I believe that I included support of ud mounted shares but since I don't use the plugin never tested. If the share appears in the destination disk drop down then it should work. Let me know Sent from my SM-T560NU using Tapatalk Unfortunately the share doesnt appear in the list. When mounting the remote smb share using the unassigned plugin it creates the remote share as a mount point /mnt/disks/DSL-AC68U-83E8_ASUS I can select this as a disk in the app backup module but then when asking for which share i cant get any further. It would be great if you could make the module be able to backup appdata to shares off the server.
  6. Is it possible to backup the appdata using the plugin to a remote share added to unassigned devices. I have a usb flash drive attached to my router and would prefer to backup appdata there rather than my array.
  7. No i dont think it is motherboard related. I have 64 gig in my server on an x99 board. I get slow boot speeds when passing through 1070 gtx vms with higher core counts. I can boot to baremetal windows and boot speed normal with 14 cores and 64 gig ram
  8. if you are using the ssd exclusively for the vm, i should passthrough the disk then install the os directly to the disk rather than use a vdisk
  9. Thanks yes i tried that and it made no difference. i have since installed emby server from Emby Repository and this docker works fine. no idea why binhexs didnt?
  10. I have re installed emby due to my appdata getting deleted. I have reinstalled and am having some problems i have not had before. I was hoping anyone with experience with emby could help me incase it is something simple. I use a laptop and an nvidea shield tv to access emby server on local network. Laptop is wireless shield is wired. Playback on the laptop through the emby web interface is perfect. edit....... same is happening on laptop as below but get error playing video message after about 10 seconds However on the shield its a different story. 1. When emby is transcoding to the shield the quality is terrible. The video will play for 10 seconds then loop back to the point video playback started. Transcoding used to be fine. My server has a 14 core cpu and 64 gigs of ram. The directory for transcoding is set to a folder on the ssd cache. 2. When playing a direct stream on the shield the video plays but will stop and artifact every 10 to 15 seconds then continue I have tried playing the same files from kodi on shield from smb share and is perfect so it cant be network related. this is how my docker is setup My path substitution is /media/TVShows To \\192.168.1.199\media\TVShows Anyone got any ideas. Strange thing is it all worked fine until i reinstalled. All settings are the same unless there is something i have forgotten?
  11. Hi Squid I just ran the clean appdata module. It found 2 appdata folders from old apps. So i selected them to delete. Unfortunately it deleted all my appdata folders. Looking at the module it still says i have one folder listed SABnzbd: /mnt/cache/appdata/ however that isnt there in my appdata? edit .. Just selected the above to be deleted again and message i get is Are you sure you want to delete these folders? /mnt/cache/appdata/ is it is deleting everything in my appadata. I let it then folder again. Then ran module again this time i said i have no orphaned appdata folders. I then started emby which created the emby appdata folder again. I checked the module again and it once again tells me i have one orpaned appdat SABnzbd: /mnt/cache/appdata/ Any idea why this is happening on my system? edit 2.... ok I remember. i guess at one time SABnzbd put its files in the root of my appdata folder. As i manually deleted these files with krusader your module thought they are still present and deletes all files in appdata :-( ok... There was a possibility I just never considered... The key here is that as you've recalled, SAB used to be pointed at /mnt/cache/appdata instead of /mnt/cache/appdata/sab CA went through, saw that sab is no longer installed (and the last installation of it had the incorrect mapping), so CA dutifully (after you said yes to the confirmation prompting to delete the entire appdata) deleted it. It winds up coming back prompting to delete it because other docker apps have recreated the appdata share. Sorry. I just never considered an app completely misconfigured like that as a possibility I'll add some checks to prevent this from happening again. In the meantime, I hope that you have a backup of the appdata folder, and I would suggest going to CA's previous apps section and clicking on the red-x next to sab to get rid of that template so that this cannot happen again. I know i should have read the delete confirmation but just rushed straight through!!! Unfortunately I dont have a backup of my appdata (i deleted it when housekeeping on server then forgot to make a fresh one) but will definately make once again, makes me see how important that is. I have just deleted the old sab template so it won't be checked by the module and will rebuild all my dockers tomorrow. The good thing is now people wont be able to do what I did lol Anyway thanks Squid for all the great work you put in here for us all, its very much appreciated
  12. Hi Squid I just ran the clean appdata module. It found 2 appdata folders from old apps. So i selected them to delete. Unfortunately it deleted all my appdata folders. Looking at the module it still says i have one folder listed SABnzbd: /mnt/cache/appdata/ however that isnt there in my appdata? edit .. Just selected the above to be deleted again and message i get is Are you sure you want to delete these folders? /mnt/cache/appdata/ is it is deleting everything in my appadata. I let it then folder again. Then ran module again this time i said i have no orphaned appdata folders. I then started emby which created the emby appdata folder again. I checked the module again and it once again tells me i have one orpaned appdat SABnzbd: /mnt/cache/appdata/ Any idea why this is happening on my system? edit 2.... ok I remember. i guess at one time SABnzbd put its files in the root of my appdata folder. As i manually deleted these files with krusader your module thought they are still present and deletes all files in appdata :-(
  13. yes i am now getting this problem binhex-couchpotato,binhex-delugevpn,binhex-sabnzbd,binhex-sickrage and binhex-sonarr.
  14. Yeah I did the recreate docker and still delugevpn says its needs an update. So I just ignore it now as it works fine anyway.
  15. Hi thanks did that and i can pull the docker image down now. I installed it last night and works fine. However i am getting the update message again this morning. I update it then when i check for updates again it says it needs updating? @naturalcarr are you getting update messages since your reinstall?
  16. Yes im using 6.2 beta 21, still cant pull delugevpn
  17. i had same happen to me. I couldnt update docker so i removed and tried reinstalling and got same error messages as you. I am hoping binhex will see this and reply soon!
  18. Um, thats interesting. I had/have a similar problem. But I noticed it when I assigned alot of cores. Also it was only when I passed through my gtx 970. Passing through a hd6450 or using vnc I didnt get the slow boot. I am waiting for a gtx 1080 and will see if I have same issue with that.
  19. Same issue here. This is either an issue with unraid webui (dockerman) and/or an issue with docker hub, both of which are out of my control unfortunately, you can either wait for a new update to come through and maybe this will resync what dockerman thinks you have and what is on docker hub, or simply delete the container AND image, and then re-pull down again. Hi Binhex i cant reinstall delugevpn after having deleted it. I get following errors. Pulling image: binhex/arch-delugevpn:latest IMAGE ID [latest]: Pulling from binhex/arch-delugevpn. IMAGE ID [a3ed95caeb02]: Already exists. IMAGE ID [af2bff008299]: Already exists. IMAGE ID [3d8de81ecefc]: Already exists. IMAGE ID [8fd4090c821b]: Already exists. IMAGE ID [fbc488e73d97]: Already exists. IMAGE ID [136af2acfbfa]: Pulling fs layer. Download complete. Extracting. Pull complete. IMAGE ID [e87355edd5cd]: Pulling fs layer. Downloading 100% of 422 B. Verifying Checksum. Download complete. Extracting. Pull complete. IMAGE ID [eab10fbc41a3]: Pulling fs layer. Download complete. Extracting. Pull complete. IMAGE ID [4982d59cf7d7]: Pulling fs layer. Downloading 100% of 2 KB. Verifying Checksum. Download complete. Extracting. Pull complete. IMAGE ID [e4707c851f55]: Pulling fs layer. Downloading 100% of 2 MB. Download complete. Extracting. Pull complete. IMAGE ID [baa9d87d8d71]: Pulling fs layer. Download complete. Extracting. Pull complete. IMAGE ID [9d2fa6591ebb]: Pulling fs layer. Downloading 100% of 1 KB. Verifying Checksum. Download complete. Extracting. Pull complete. IMAGE ID [2dbfcd5304ec]: Pulling fs layer. Downloading 100% of 2 KB. Download complete. Extracting. Pull complete. IMAGE ID [af646dc4ce1f]: Pulling fs layer. Download complete. Extracting. Pull complete. IMAGE ID [58eab22145fe]: Pulling fs layer. Downloading 100% of 1 KB. Download complete. Extracting. Pull complete. IMAGE ID [51afa166eaf9]: Pulling fs layer. Downloading 100% of 98 MB. Verifying Checksum. Download complete. Extracting. Pull complete. TOTAL DATA PULLED: 100 MB Command: root@localhost:# /usr/local/emhttp/plugins/dynamix.docker.manager/scripts/docker run -d --name="binhex-delugevpn" --net="bridge" --privileged="true" -e TZ="Europe/London" -e HOST_OS="unRAID" -e "VPN_ENABLED"="yes" -e "VPN_USER"="vpn username" -e "VPN_PASS"="vpn password" -e "VPN_REMOTE"="nl.privateinternetaccess.com" -e "VPN_PORT"="1194" -e "VPN_PROTOCOL"="udp" -e "VPN_PROV"="pia" -e "ENABLE_PRIVOXY"="no" -e "LAN_NETWORK"="192.168.1.0/24" -e "DEBUG"="false" -e "PUID"="99" -e "PGID"="100" -p 8112:8112/tcp -p 58846:58846/tcp -p 8118:8118/tcp -v "path for downloads":"/data":rw -v "/mnt/cache/appdata/binhex-delugevpn":"/config":rw binhex/arch-delugevpn Unable to find image 'binhex/arch-delugevpn:latest' locally latest: Pulling from binhex/arch-delugevpn a3ed95caeb02: Already exists af2bff008299: Already exists a3ed95caeb02: Already exists 3d8de81ecefc: Already exists 8fd4090c821b: Already exists a3ed95caeb02: Already exists a3ed95caeb02: Already exists a3ed95caeb02: Already exists fbc488e73d97: Already exists 136af2acfbfa: Pulling fs layer e87355edd5cd: Pulling fs layer eab10fbc41a3: Pulling fs layer 4982d59cf7d7: Pulling fs layer e4707c851f55: Pulling fs layer baa9d87d8d71: Pulling fs layer 9d2fa6591ebb: Pulling fs layer 2dbfcd5304ec: Pulling fs layer af646dc4ce1f: Pulling fs layer 58eab22145fe: Pulling fs layer 51afa166eaf9: Pulling fs layer 9d2fa6591ebb: Waiting 2dbfcd5304ec: Waiting af646dc4ce1f: Waiting 58eab22145fe: Waiting 51afa166eaf9: Waiting baa9d87d8d71: Waiting 4982d59cf7d7: Waiting e4707c851f55: Waiting e87355edd5cd: Download complete eab10fbc41a3: Download complete 136af2acfbfa: Verifying Checksum 136af2acfbfa: Download complete baa9d87d8d71: Download complete 4982d59cf7d7: Verifying Checksum 4982d59cf7d7: Download complete 136af2acfbfa: Pull complete 136af2acfbfa: Pull complete e87355edd5cd: Pull complete e87355edd5cd: Pull complete e4707c851f55: Verifying Checksum e4707c851f55: Download complete eab10fbc41a3: Pull complete eab10fbc41a3: Pull complete 2dbfcd5304ec: Verifying Checksum 2dbfcd5304ec: Download complete 9d2fa6591ebb: Verifying Checksum 9d2fa6591ebb: Download complete 4982d59cf7d7: Pull complete 4982d59cf7d7: Pull complete e4707c851f55: Pull complete e4707c851f55: Pull complete baa9d87d8d71: Pull complete baa9d87d8d71: Pull complete 9d2fa6591ebb: Pull complete 9d2fa6591ebb: Pull complete 58eab22145fe: Verifying Checksum 58eab22145fe: Download complete af646dc4ce1f: Verifying Checksum af646dc4ce1f: Download complete 2dbfcd5304ec: Pull complete 2dbfcd5304ec: Pull complete af646dc4ce1f: Pull complete af646dc4ce1f: Pull complete 58eab22145fe: Pull complete 58eab22145fe: Pull complete 51afa166eaf9: Verifying Checksum 51afa166eaf9: Download complete 51afa166eaf9: Pull complete 51afa166eaf9: Pull complete docker: layers from manifest don't match image configuration. See '/usr/bin/docker run --help'. The command failed.
  20. i think it should be like this label unRAID OS menu default kernel /bzimage append intel_iommu=on vfio_iommu_type1.allow_unsafe_interrupts=1 pcie_acs_override=downstream isolcpus=8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,24,25,26,27,28,29,30,31=/bzroot
  21. One possibility: http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=49511.msg475010#msg475010 Thanks for the suggestion Squid. But i am not pinning any cpus to the docker. Any other ideas? The problem is with this docker alone. The only other possibility I saw (and I already checked it out) was that the app was a non-automated build (but its not), so its up to Binhex now. BTW, that link wasn't specific to cpu pinning, but any extra parameters that you may have added old style to the Repository entry and not to the Extra Parameters entry Thanks. No, i am not using any extra parameters for the docker. Yes will wait for Binhex. Dockers working fine for me anyway so its not urgent for me to update it. Just hate seeing an update in my docker list and cant change it. Guess I will have to just surpress my ocd for now lol
  22. One possibility: http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=49511.msg475010#msg475010 Thanks for the suggestion Squid. But i am not pinning any cpus to the docker. Any other ideas? The problem is with this docker alone.
  23. Having problems updating docker. Says update available but after update still says update available?
×
×
  • Create New...