Hammerfest

sorry for the late reply, had to take a trip out of town and did not see this at all i have made some config changes, so hopefully it doesnt sully what you where looking for, please find the requested diag in our convo

refresh was done of course, no visual change noted

did not even have to use the refresh, soon as it was installed, boom, they all show up ❤️

HP DL380 Gen9 with only drive bays, none of the drives where physically removed at all during any of the testing mentioned

Sorry, guess I was not really clear I guess, before I wiped it, I had 2 drives out of the array, only 1 of them showed in unassigned devices (plugin), but showed up fine when plugin uninstalled. When I setup my unraid back in 2020~, the first thing I always did was install most of your tools, same hardware, it showed all devices just fine, i only noticed it with the upgrade to 6.12 when i was trying to troubleshoot other issues. still, the important part is, without the plugin, unassigned devices shows them all, with the plugin, it shows random selection of devices, if i add a drive to an array or pool unassinged devices plugin will flash in/out and sometimes display a few more, and sometimes a few less, this is all regardless of the array start/stop state EDIT: Further testing, added flash drive to array (zfs pool workaround), started array, drives in UD plugin changed but still not all of them, stopped it, added a regular HDD, started, drives in UD plugin again changed, stopped added a second, again drives shown in plugin changed, added two more, changed again, now I at least see one of my SSD's but not both "I don't believe UD is keeping up with the Unraid changes in this condition because UD thinks some disks are still assigned to the array" this is from a nuked state, drives where secure wiped and have not been setup at all, USB was also secure erased, nothing i can find is from prior installation. EDIT2: drunk testing, apparently, hitting the "refresh disks and configuration" button for the plugin adds the disks back one at a time each refresh, AND, it survives a reboot... diag attached in-case it helps tell you anything helpful in fixing the plugin gotta set it up for use now, if problem persists in the future, will circle back, TY TY for the great tools making unraid greater! drunkenUDdiscovery-diagnostics-20240417-2354.zip

Ya, its really weird, and when i add some devices to the array or a pool it magically has other drives pop up in the unassigned devices section, tried different browsers as I mainline firefox due to features it has that others don't, but same behavior. Will edit this in a few min with the diags for both withoutUDplug-diagnostics-20240417-1935.zip withUDplug-diagnostics-20240417-1934.zip

Sure, all I am doing is removing and adding the add-on. Will do it when im able this evening.

If someone has already reported this issue, then my use of search terms with the forum's search feature has failed me. When using Unassigned Devices, not all unassigned devices show up, this seems to be with both .9 and .10 I was already preparing to totally redo my system due to VM issues (VM's not wanting to restart, they just hang and use up CPU even from fresh install with only viostor driver), so thought it may have something to do with but alas, on a totally fresh install, the issue remains 2 pictures attached, one with the default unassigned devices listing, showing all my drives properly, the second, with unassigned devices add-on installed.

First chain that comes up with a google search. You ever get it work as its not for me. Using a Synology router here so different there, but same issue, UPnP on the Unraid box is not workin. Options are set, confirmed UPnP works on other servers/systems, tested manual UPnP probing from a VM as well.

It is actually maddening that they allow you to select Windows 11 as an option for making a VM yet it doesn't work out of box. Windows 11 issues because secure boot is disabled and cannot be enabled without jumping through hoops. Just remove the Windows 11 option, save lots of headache, I can do custom all day, but I EXPECT an option to work if its presented.

Appreciate the note about virt-manager, I did not have to do that, but whatever it blocked during the update and i copied back over let it work. I use the crap outta virt-manager so gonna look for an alternative so i can remove it so it doesnt cause future update issues. Might put it in the blacklist for updating unraid.

Disclaimer: I posted on Sunday, its only Monday, the following is said with that understanding of not a lot of time has passed. Not seeing anything I went ahead and made a backup of the USB, then I copied the files from the 6.12.3 dl and replaced all EXCEPT the config folder on the drive (there used to be a wiki about whats on the drive and what to actually keep, sadly that wiki article is MIA now ). That resolved the no-boot brick situation. I did upgrade it back to 6.12.4 to see if I could reproduce the VM issue and that did NOT reoccur thankfully (ive not booted the VM's, waiting for current backup to complete, but I can get to the VM section again which is a difference). I am leaving this here as a bug report as it did happen and did require me to nuke my USB (sans config folder) in order to recover from a failed rollback. Speaking of the secondary issue of reverting it causing it to keel over, if admins want me to see if that's reproduceable let me know and I will make time for it sometime this weekend.

Went through logs as best I could hardware side (iLO/BIOS), nothing there. Memtest passed a few cycles not that I expected it to fail System is booted into a Linux Live environment (not a linux user myself, but works faster to get at data since im remote at the moment), so before I nuke if anyone has anything they want to check or a recommended fix, im all ears* since I can see the USB Flash drive (thus all the data on it) and it also reports healthy. *After some sleep of course!

Hrm, for the first time I can recall, the rollback didnt work either and has currently bricked my unraid. Did make sure bridging was enabled per release docs (but I don't think that would cause it to just keel over) Dies after "loading /bzroot... ok" Same message for the other boot options, though you do get "loading /bzroot -gui ...ok" for the GUI ones

Not ISO's, just files, would like a simple "create dummy fake USB 1GB" that can be mounted, sounds like its not possible, all well, guess will use local PC I guess I will put it in feature requests, such a simple and yet probably heavily used feature if it existed, throw some files on a virtual USB, "plug" it into any VM, no network access needed, no totally different VM needed

Maybe Google and the forum Search don't love me, maybe I am using the wrong keywords, either way, I am lost. I have installs to make in a VM, the VM is not network connected, it needs drivers, software. Sadly, I am not local so I cant just copy the files to the USB then pass-through to the VM. Is it possible to make a virtual USB/Storage drive with unRAID? Or some other method as I CANNOT connect it to a network (at ALL)?

Is there a reason that unraid is the only solution out of those it competes with that doesn't have a feature to clone/copy/duplicate a VM easily? Lost in a sea of different "how-to"'s, seeing countless google search result asking the EXACT SAME QUESTION and yet the answers are outdated, over complicated, or changed due to version differences, outdated buggy apps to do so, etc etc etc. I seriously like unraid over the others, but holy crap this is bang head against wall annoying.

in the LinuxServer.io discord yes, forum thread no, seems like people there pointed to the discord or irc. "with all info needed to set up diskover. Any unraid specific instructions for common things like adding from dockerhub and editing templates are not a part of our Readmes." is hugely contradictory for anyone not familiar with how linux, dockers, dependencies and unraid work and thus my statement on the advanced tag for it Will continue on discord or in the other forum thread so as to not clutter CA any further.

I could understand the angst here if it was needing to maintain a container on the latest version, diskover doesn't however require the latest so I don't understand the venom and angst here especially considering the constant posts I see asking about help with the dependencies meaning basically, that sample size of people unable to use your hard work with diskover container is greater then 1 (I could count forum posts/threads and reddit posts/threads but it would only serve to drive home the same point). If not making "someone else's container" (which cool, I get that), then maybe adding an ADVANCED ONLY tag to those containers which require dependency's which don't exist in template form and are NOT easy to install, OR on the friendlier side, since it SHOULD BE EXPECTED that absolute dunce's like myself will be looking at these seemingly easy things, providing installation instructions for them might alleviate this building issue with a disclaimer that the instructions can become invalid at any point in time, rather then the current nothing at all. I have spent the last hour~ in addition to the additional time yesterday, poked a few people, and STILL cannot get this working. Mind you, I rate myself below novice level and am happy to degrade myself and put on the dunce cap, but even the people i have asked at novice/intermediate level (in a novice>intermediate>advanced scale) still bring no joy. Sure, I should KNOW ALL OF THIS despite coming from Windows GUI environment, but so far, no readme, existing answers/directions have resolved this setup problem. Don't get me wrong, I am grateful for the work that the linuxserver.io group put into this and think its AWESOME that you would do the work, BUT, at this point with the lacking first post in the thread, and 3rd party notice about the dependencies required, as a new user to unraid, after all my attempts, mentally I now place a "stick to the EZ mode stuff slick" tag to anything I see now which requires other non template dependencies.

This... surprisingly was not in the results I found, in-fact, I didn't see anywhere that this was possible until you mentioned something and my search specifically contained this info (not shown in the help feature unRAID has). This worked. And yes, the posts for their containers is sorely lacking EDIT: I have much more to learn, this is just not enough, must add more variables it seems, wasn't in appdata and couldn't find it anywhere when installed (installed to non existent space!), im sure its somewhere just not finding it, all well, thanks for the help CA peeps! Will go bother someone else or give up down the line

I had a question which might (overall) be better suited somewhere else, BUT, I figured at least PART of it can go here since it will be in the form of feature requests. Disclaimer, worse then a novice here as a new unRAID user (outside of SMB testing), flame away, and YES, I have tried google and the forums own search only to find so many "how-to's" and "directions" that I felt lead to post and ask questions in a few different discord's with no good result. Some of the app's have dependencies which are NOT in CA but can be found in the docker hub search results after adding the advanced flag. Sadly, cannot seem to set through CA at least what version to pull. Feature request 1: version to install option Feature request 2: sort by last updated Feature request 3: sort by version number where applicable in search results? (this one is more hazy as has super situational context) This came about because I wanted to install diskover, sadly, it requires elasticsearch (a specific version at that), nothing in CA, but is found in the CA dockerhub results, sadly, this and a few other docker's do NOT support the "latest" tag, so attempting to install will always fail as CA is using the latest tag. I tried to find the version that was going to be needed for diskover (older v5.6.x) in the results, but sadly with 368 results, I was getting nowhere fast. With my search results, quite a few different answers such as packages with other things in it, console install methods (multiple, ala the frustration), and while I will try one of those console methods tomorrow when i have had more then 3hrs of sleep for the day (is 11:30~PM for me), I figured I might get chided for missing the "easy" solution in my search results, but for the wonderful assholes friends who pointed me to unRAID and specifically CA, they have about 3 years of experience into unRAID, but never had to venture into console because of how wonderful CA makes it, they where of no help and not able to figure it out either :X! Much thanks for CA to everyone involved.

I signed up to post some issues I am having with my setup, but couldn't resist when I saw this debate happening, SOOO, I decided to ask around my office, also asked a few friends, keeping in mind about 10-40 years of Tech work per person... office "poll" results where if there is an Auto feature/option, chances are: ITS ON I literally gave no supporting information, I asked them what is the first thought when looking at something and it says "auto", 100% of the people I asked (admittedly only 17 total, 13 techs who work for me and 4 friends) said ON... To each their own, but to me and at least the group of people I deal with on a daily basis, if it says auto, 99% of the time it means ON Feature deserves an Auto/Off/On value, I will be doing 10Gbe testing with my rig before the end of the month, company is prepping 10Gbe stuff's and my box is an allowed test box, even providing me an Intel 10Gbe for testing (must be returned of course...)