Alphahelix

is it possible to have some sort of add-in? I am using a ASRock B650M PG Riptide, and no temps.

+1 EDIT: I found a work-around by adding another user, I don't think it is the best solution, but it works... on the running container, click on the "Grafana-Unraid-Stack" icon, and select "Console" write the command "influx" in the influx console (inside the HUS-console) write the following command: CREATE USER <username> WITH PASSWORD '<password>' WITH ALL PRIVILEGES then the command "exit" then the command "exit" again done! Source: https://docs.influxdata.com/influxdb/v1.8/administration/authentication_and_authorization/#user-management-commands I hope it can help.

Hi and welcome... 1) Disclaimer & security warning 2) How it started & Home Assistant 3) pfSense with 2 bridged connections 4) Dreams for the setup 5) Use-case Hardware specs from tools->System Devices: [8086:0f00] 00:00.0 Host bridge: Intel Corporation Atom Processor Z36xxx/Z37xxx Series SoC Transaction Register (rev 0e) [8086:0f31] 00:02.0 VGA compatible controller: Intel Corporation Atom Processor Z36xxx/Z37xxx Series Graphics & Display (rev 0e) [8086:0f23] 00:13.0 SATA controller: Intel Corporation Atom Processor E3800 Series SATA AHCI Controller (rev 0e) [8086:0f35] 00:14.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation Atom Processor Z36xxx/Z37xxx, Celeron N2000 Series USB xHCI (rev 0e) [8086:0f18] 00:1a.0 Encryption controller: Intel Corporation Atom Processor Z36xxx/Z37xxx Series Trusted Execution Engine (rev 0e) [8086:0f04] 00:1b.0 Audio device: Intel Corporation Atom Processor Z36xxx/Z37xxx Series High Definition Audio Controller (rev 0e) [8086:0f48] 00:1c.0 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Atom Processor E3800 Series PCI Express Root Port 1 (rev 0e) [8086:0f4a] 00:1c.1 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Atom Processor E3800 Series PCI Express Root Port 2 (rev 0e) [8086:0f4c] 00:1c.2 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Atom Processor E3800 Series PCI Express Root Port 3 (rev 0e) [8086:0f4e] 00:1c.3 PCI bridge: Intel Corporation Atom Processor E3800 Series PCI Express Root Port 4 (rev 0e) [8086:0f34] 00:1d.0 USB controller: Intel Corporation Atom Processor Z36xxx/Z37xxx Series USB EHCI (rev 0e) [8086:0f1c] 00:1f.0 ISA bridge: Intel Corporation Atom Processor Z36xxx/Z37xxx Series Power Control Unit (rev 0e) [8086:0f12] 00:1f.3 SMBus: Intel Corporation Atom Processor E3800 Series SMBus Controller (rev 0e) [10ec:8168] 01:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 0c) [8086:088e] 02:00.0 Network controller: Intel Corporation Centrino Advanced-N 6235 (rev 24) [10ec:8168] 03:00.0 Ethernet controller: Realtek Semiconductor Co., Ltd. RTL8111/8168/8411 PCI Express Gigabit Ethernet Controller (rev 0c) 1) This little guide is foremost to give inspiration, not good in practical, as this is not wise security wise. (https://forums.unraid.net/topic/104669-warning-unraid-servers-exposed-to-the-internet-are-being-hacked/) 2) Since I am a bit craz... I mean dedicated, I like to repurpose old hardware to give it new life. Recently I started playing around HASS (Home Assistant), and remembered I had 2 old "All-In-One" PC's with touchscreen laying around unused. So I set one up with Mint and firefox in kiosk mode. No problem... Then I thought at should be able to run HASS in a virtual environment (either docker or VM) and sure it could. Now my problem is, I have tried all my best (including Google searching) to pass-through a USB device (Zigbee) into said docker or VM. But I guess I am a better in other ares than Linux/Docker... I then thought if I used unRaid as passing anything through in unRaid is so easy. And sure no problem... But I still want a browser in kiosk mode. And since my two PCs are defently not build for VM use I soon realized that I do not have IOMMU so passing the GPU through to a linux VM was out of my abilities once again. (please let me know if there is a way to do this) 3) My main goal was to use one of these old PC with touchscreen as a terminal that run pfSense, HASS and a browser in kisok mode. Preferably on a linux host as they use less resources compared to Windows. But as mentioned above, I cannot pass-through any PCIe device. So a Linux VM in unRaid without the GPU would not make it possible to use the screen. Forcing me to use a Linux with GUI as host (I know unRaid have a GUI, but I have no keyboard or on-screen keyboard so I am stuck at the login screen). 4) But since I was playing with these two I wondered if I could install pfSense since they have 2 x 1gb NIC. But remember I have no way to pass the PCIe device through to a VM, even tried this as it mentioned splitting NIC that all are in one IOMMU: So I took another approach... a) Start the download of the pfSense ISO b) Removed the bonding in settings->network settings c) Made sure "enable bridging" was set to yes d) Configured eth1 (my second NIC) to "IPv4 address assignment" to none e) After the array was up I created a VM with the free BSD profile I ) Changed BIOS to SeaBIOS II ) in OS Install ISO select pfSense I have downloaded before III ) Changed Primary vDisk Bus to SATA IV ) Added a second Network and selected br1 V ) Removed the checkin "Start VM after creation" VI ) Clicked create VII ) Edited the new VM and click on the "Form view" button so it changes to XML view VIII) Scrolling down to <interface tyope='bridge'> IX ) Change model from virtio or virtio-net to e1000e on both birdge configurations X ) Click update f) Start the pfSense VM and configure it with br0 as LAN and br1 as WAN 5) Since unRaid is technically exposed to the big bad internet I would not use this for other than to test new features in pfSense or to get familiar with pfSense. It should be safe enough if your ISP is protecting you as a customer with a NAT firewall, but I would rather be safe and just find another solution. But at least I figured out how to setup a pfSense VM without passing through any PCIe devices, though its rather academic in nature.. Last, if anyone know how of a good solution please let me know.

None of them, my needs are covered with the current options. (was not able to choose none)

I have been told (not sure if it correct) that firefox stills sends data back to mozilla, but Waterfox do not. Just in case it is correct I use Waterfox.

I know WiFi on linux is not 1 2 3 boom done. And not all drivers are free (read that somewhere on the forum). But still I would love be able to create a separate IoT devices I then can route to dockers and/or VM's. Maybe a supported hardware list for the drivers that actually works. It could maybe be a plugin? This way any inconvenience or stability issues would not effect users that have no use for WiFi. I know Christmas is a LOOONG way from now, but pretty please.

I can't seem to get it to work. I followed your guide, and I can log in. But once I log in I can't see any photos at all, not even JPEG. via console I can see data has photos in it, but still no luck. Any suggestions?

Thank you!

I may to tired, but after numerous google searches (the only hits is actually this thread) I cannot to my death not find anything on how to Enable host access for a docker. I am currently using "testdasi/pihole-dot-doh:latest" have I chosen the wrong image? Any help is greatly appreciated... /Alphahelix

aaand now it works. Thanks for confirming I am WAY off.

It looks like prometheus.yml is no longer available. Or is it me who is way off?

Hi, TLDR: request for manually naming and sorting disks in the array (and unassigned if possible), under the main tab as well as in shell. I have been happy with "location plugin". But I think a possibility to rename array disk to give an instant idea of the disks location in the server. I know it would be a few people who will benefit from this. But I think (I am not burdened with a lot of knowledge of the Linux systems' inner workings) this would be a fairly easy task. As unRAID already using disk1 disk2 disk3 etc and not sdb sdc sdd etc as designations. I have tried to search the forums but did not find anything useful like a editing a file (not said that it may be out there, I just did not find it). I did try to edit the /etc/mtab file but it was unsuccessful. So now I make this change request for manually naming and sorting disks in the array (and unassigned if possible). I know devs like a use case so for my case it is much easier to find the disk in my system that currently has 36 drives (not including the usb boot). I have 24 accessible from the front, plus 8 SSD residing on an air-shield within the system. With possibility to manually rename (example disk1 to diska1) will quickly give me the info needed to locate the drive. Therefore reducing the risk of mistaken physical disks. I know most of this is covered by the before mentioned plugin. But I like to see the physical location in shell too. Unfortunately the plugin does not help me there.

Hi! First, super cool plugin. Its now super easy to install dockers and plugins Thanks! I hope it is ok to bring suggestions. I personally would love the idea of being able to tick and untick categories of interest. Right now you only have the option of choosing one category at a time. /Alphahelix

A long shot... if changes was made to "dirty" memory, and there is a lot of unwritten cache, could that be the reason why the system can't free up enough memory to start the VM? I know I asked it as a question. The reason is I am not 100% sure myself, how the system would react to this situation. But it is a possibility, I think. /Alphahelix

As @trurl said, it is most likely a bad connection, try to replace the signal cable (SATA/SAS).

Hi Rix, First, I hope you are ok and that you are safe. I has also been in the front line during the SARS-CoV-2 virus "outbreak", so I can relate to your situation. Maybe another can help in Rix' absence? My issue is I have 2 DVD-drives and 1 BluRay-drive and I am trying to rip my old DVD collection. I have trawled through this thread and saw I need to have a separate container for each drive. It works like a charm with only 1 drive but when I add another drive (and container) it doesn't seem to work for drive 2. My settings are as follows (for my second drive): Name: Ripper1 Extra Parameters: --device=/dev/sr1:/dev/sr0 Optical Drive: /dev/sr1 Output Dir: /mnt/user/rips/ripper1/ Config Dir: /mnt/user/appdata/ripper1 I have tried to make sure that everything gets its own directory, but I still cannot get it to work. Have I made an error somewhere? /Alphahelix

Hi all, I hope you can help me with telegraf, I cant seem to get it to get metrics from my eth0 or eth1 or br0. I followed the guide provided by atribe, yet not metrics is to be found I don't even have a header that could look like network statistics. I have mem, CPU, disk, docker etc but nothing about network. Funny thing... I can get the docker network usage, but I think it is snatched from the docker sub-system. /Alphahelix

Hi again. First thanks for your correction, Its logical that it won't work if I use the wrong program. Now I did manage to find the command for ipmi-dcmi ipmi-dcmi --hostname=HOST-NAME-OF-SYSTEM --username=USER-NAME --password=PASSWORD --get-system-power-statistics | grep "Current Power" Can anyone help me with a guide to have the plugin include this command when collection the other IPMI data? I would very much like to see the power draw now the feature is there. Thanks in advance /Alphahelix

This helped me too, thanks a bunch!

Hi, I hope it is ok to ask for help here. I have found out I can use ipmitool (on ubuntu) to get the current power draw. I use this command: ipmitool -H HOST-NAME-OF-SYSTEM -U USER-NAME -P PASSWORD dcmi power reading But I am no wizard in programming. So my question is this: Is it possible to add either the command or the functionality to the plugin version if IPMItool? /Alphahelix

Hi, I have a question regarding Bitwarden. I cant seem to get it to work with Chrome (I cant create a profile or login). According to this site: https://github.com/hassio-addons/addon-bitwarden#known-issues-and-limitations Known issues and limitations Some web browsers, like Chrome, disallow the use of Web Crypto APIs in insecure contexts. In this case, you might get an error like Cannot read property 'importKey'. To solve this problem, you need to enable SSL and access the web interface using HTTPS. So how do I enable https ? otherwise I dont see it will work with chrome. /Alphahelix

Ok I know that ZFS is at the moment not possible to implement in unRAID due to legal issues. But... what if someone (unfortunately I lack the programming skills) was to take some of the features and make a rudimentary construct? Would that still be ok legal-wise? Let us pretend it is, and let me theorize how it could benefit us unRAIDers... Today we have individual disks for parity and data, only cache can consist of multiple disks. To my knowledge (and i do not claim to burdened with in-dept-knowledge) of ZFS uses vdev(s) that consists of on or more disks that can vary in sizes. With multiple vdevs you are able to expand the ZFS. vdev(s) uses ZFS own data protection single, mirror, RaidZ1, RaidZ2, RaidZ3 etc. where the number indicates how many parity disks in the pool(s). Now if we use a somewhat similar approach in unRAID where we bundle individual disk to a pool-of-disks (Abbreviated as POD from this point on) running in stripped-mode via "mdadm" and assigning PODs different roles like individual disks are today. In theory the benefits should be increased speed. Also we should be able to make a POD that consist of SSD's for parity-POD and a data-POD, thus get a very high transfer speed outside the cache and still have data protected in parity. For those wanting multiple arrays, this could be seen as each POD could be seen as one array. I have tried to create a visual of how disk assignment is today, and with the POD design: Today: 8tb Disk0-parity0 6tb Disk1-parity1 4tb Disk2-data0 4tb Disk4-data1 4tb Disk5-data2 4tb Disk6-data3 4tb Disk7-data4 4tb Disk8-data5 6tb Disk9-data6 6tb Disk10-data7 6tb Disk11-data8 6tb Disk12-data9 4tb Disk13-data10 4tb Disk14-data11 4tb Disk15-data12 POD-design: 4tb Disk2 POD0-parity0 4tb Disk4 POD0-parity0 4tb Disk5 POD0-parity0 4tb Disk6 POD1-parity1 4tb Disk7 POD1-parity1 4tb Disk8 POD1-parity1 6tb Disk9 POD2-data0 6tb Disk10 POD2-data0 6tb Disk11 POD3-data1 6tb Disk12 POD3-data1 4tb Disk13 POD4-data2 4tb Disk14 POD4-data2 4tb Disk15 POD4-data2 8tb Disk0 POD5-data3 6tb Disk1 POD5-data4 In the example above overall performance in the array should in theory be faster, even with unRAID's speed penalty. Further POD4 should have superior read/write speed (given that no other PODs are active at that moment). And one could argue that you now have 4 smaller arrays. This is will no doubt make the "master"-array more vulnerable to disk fails, but by using mdadm you are not limited to RAID0, but can in theory use RAID6 in one POD and RAID0 in another should there be a need for that. Also if memory serves me correctly, ZFS has no way of expanding a vdev. It is possible to expand a POD using mdadm. (with limitations in RAID10) When using mdadm it is also possible for RAID6 (most likely also RAID5) to add a hot spare disk for minimal "rebuild-time" if needed. So data residing in a POD with RAID6 will have "internal POD protection" in form of RAID6 but also be protected by the parity POD(s). Data residing in a POD with RAID0 will only have the protection of the parity POD(s), and thus be more vulnerable than a setup where you have 1 disk for parity and 1 disk for data. The reason is if ONE disk in a RAID0 array breaks down ALL data is lost. So with the POD design using RAID0 you are more vulnerable than if you have 1 disk for parity and 1 disk for data. So I think a 1 disk for parity and 1 disk for data solution should still be possible, at least as having a POD with only 1 disk in it. Now I know some may think this is a bad idea, but I am sure some think it can be useful. I think that if Limetech chooses to implement this it should be for PLUS & PRO licenses only as 6 disks and below will get little benefit from this. I have tried to list pros and cons for this POD design: PRO: 1a) if theory meets practice we should see a read speed bump for each disk added to a POD 1b) if theory meets practice we should see a write speed bump for each(* 2 for RAID10) disk added to a RAID0/RAID10*/RAID5/RAID6 POD 2) possibility to "kind of" having multiple arrays 3) possibility to have hot spares for selected PODs 4) selective elevated data protection for each POD CON: 1) more vulnerable to data loss when RAID0 is used in POD 2) less available space from disks where anything else but RAID0 is used in POD 3) CPU usage may be higher due to the extra "layer" of RAID This suggestion is to give inspiration I have only used what I know/heard of. I know it is a bit far out. But at least no one got hurt. /Alphahelix

Hi! To be hones I have not read all 44 pages... But is it possible to have the little arrow in the dashboard like all the new boxes have? /Alphahelix

Hi Lime Tech. Thank you for taking these security updates seriously... I makes me feel safe to know that unRAID is safe to use out of the box. Also to know IF you choose to lower the security you have to make an active change, that makes unRAID versatile OS with a ton of possibilities... Keep up the good work. /Alphahelix

First... SUPER guide!!! easy to follow and instant result. 👍 But as others have mentioned, if this could be turned into a plugin with toggles for each security risk for the user to choose from it would be (in my world) perfect. Unfortunately I lack the knowledge to create such a plugin. I know it is always easier to ask others to do the hard work. sorry for that. /Alphahelix