hi2hello

Members
  • Posts

    42
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by hi2hello

  1. Wow! That seems to be really bad news. I was assuming that any kind of data corruption would lead to an error notification by default. Would like to see that implemented as I think it is a must-have-feature.
  2. The plugin works, till the next update of unraid … To me, this topic is all about a will for change or excuses for just keeping on. Matter of priority and state of mind.
  3. I also would like to state that having a solid support for S3 sleep would be highly appreciated. Energy costs are still going through the roof, climate change is everywhere (over here, this year is, again, the hottest and driest since recording weather data - while our region is considered rather not to be affected by global warming) and my server is forced to run 24/7 just because there still is no official solution, even on the horizon (this topic yet alone was started one and a half years ago). Don’t get me wrong, I am aware of problems that might be caused by S3 but honestly, I just dont get into my head, that saving energy does still not seem to have the priority and awareness that it would need to actively change an irresponsible (and often quiet senseless) waste of ressources. Some day, our kids will ask us "why?" … In a nutshell: I would love to see unraid putting more effort in lowering energy consumption. I would like to see less discussion about the inevitable but more action. Thank you so much!
  4. Still not 100% sure but I guess, I found the problem: seems that I "killed" the go-file (if so, than stupid me)
  5. That is exactly what I initially did. I just deleted it because I managed to get back into the GUI with an quiet old backup of my stick. If you guys would like to know what happened (I would be very curious about it), here ist the diagnostics file again … Edit: Found solution. Deleted diagnostics
  6. Ok, I managed to get back into the GUI. I was lucky and had an old backup of my stick from june. Copied the config to the stick and now have a connection to tha GUI again. Anyways: Very strange!
  7. Hi there, I needed to restart my server running on latest 6.11.1 this morning. Unfortunately, I does not come back up again properly. The GUI is not showing up in the browser nor does any of the dockers start. I can connect to the server via SSH, while entering the IP-address in any browser (also with cache emptied) just brings up an error (page could not be loaded). (The server seems to reject requests to the IP-address. When it is shutdown, page loading takes a while before stating that the address is not reachable. Running the server, the message, that the page could not be loaded comes pretty much immediately). In the meantime I tried the following with no luck: deleted / deavtivated all plug-ins, reboot makes no difference booted into safemode GUI > firefox gives an error (localhost page not showing up) used USB flash creator from backup > no luck used fresh 6.11.1 image from usb flash creator and copied over config folder > no luck ckecked on network > nothing of special interest and no changes to the config that was always running smoothly Connecting a display to the server, it boots up and afterwards remains at the prompt command "LogIn" (which is supposed to be fine, I guess?) There are some minor error messages (such as the grep thingy from the webgui plugin), but to my knowledge, nothing special or a big deal (and as I stated, those errors go away when deactivating plugins folder, but webgui still does not come up). I have no idea what else to try. Maybe you guys have an idea. Please find diagnostics attached … Thank you in advance! Edit: diagnostics deleted
  8. Done. After the disk preclear was finished, everything went just as intended. @JorgeB Thank you very much for your kind support and the helping hand! Very much appreciated!
  9. Ok. Thanks for the info. One more question: Once the new disk is precleared, I assume that I can attach it to the array and it than will be marked "unformatted" after restarting the array? There would be a format command for the newly attached disk BUT, would this then automatically put xfs on it, or would I have a choice? In other words: I would like to use btrfs for the new disk and I am not sure on how to accomplish this (as i think that formatting the drive after attaching it to the array automatically will put xfs to it) I am aware, that there will be an option to format the precleard drive with unassigned devices, but I am not sure if the preclear infos will than be lost / wiped and I d had to start over again with preclearing / clearing. Thank your very much for your advice EDIT: I think I found it. Under Settings > Disk Settings > Standard Data Filesystem I assume, changing this from xfs to btrfs would than automatically format a new disk with btrfs? Can you confirm this?
  10. Ok, so I am rebuilding parity now and as this takes about 1,5 days (honestly not too happy about it, as I was already doing this a few days ago), I am also precelaring the new disk. Takes pretty much the same amount of time. Once this is all done, am I getting it right, that with the following procedure: - stop array - change slots to "5" - select the new hdd under data disk 4 it should than be possible, to restart the array and having an array of an overall 6 disks? Am I getting this correct? Thank you very much.
  11. Please find the diagnostics attached. 2 questions: 1. I was rebuilding the array under Tools / New Config, so there is actually no valid parity. Do I need to rebuild parity before I can add another drive? 2. Does the new drive must be precelared before adding it to the array or is it enough to format it?
  12. Hello, i wanted to add a new HDD to my server which would be device number 6 (1 Parity, 4 Data Drives, 1 Cache).Currently, there are 5 devices attached (1 Parity, 3 Data Drives, 1 Cache). As far as i know, 6 devices are supported by the Unraid OS Basic Licence that i own. Unfortunately, it just does not work to set up the new HDD as Data Drive #4. As soon as I stop the array, unraid lets me add a second parity, which is not what i want, as I d like to use the new disk as data disk. The possibility to add a 4th data-drive is just appearing, when i switch the number of slots from 5 to 6 down at the bottom of the array-rider. Than i can add the HDD as 4th device but I am getting an error that says "too many devices" (7 devices are shown, so it seems that Parity 2, which is not assigned and should not be, is also counted.) Any idea what I am doing wrong? Thanks for your kind help. Very much appreciated.
  13. Thank you for your feedback, much appreciated. So i have set up everything as it should be (call it early-morning-intuition ). Also thank you for providing the docker. Really awesome! By the way: Do you know a way I could do something like a "trace route", including the ips of my internal network? I would really love to see whats going on when submitting a web request. (That is probably nothing about your container, just generally asking.) Hi5, hi2hello
  14. Hi, i have setup your doh-client. Maybe its already too late over here but i have a question on setting things up with pihole. Right now, i have set the doh-client docker to br0 with ip xxx.xxx.xx.30, pi-hole docker container runs on br0 with ip xxx.xxx.xx.20. I have set the DNS1 and DNS 2 in pihole to the ip-address of the doh-client (…30). Is this correct? And what IP do i need on my Router? The IP of the doh-client or the IP of pi-hole? Thanks a lot in advance for clearing things up.
  15. Hi there, whenever i had an external disk mounted to my unraid server (6.8.2 DVB edition) via unassigned devices (letest version and plus), i keep getting errors via mail that do look like this: subject: cron for user *** /sbin/fstrim -a -v | logger &> /dev/null fstrim: /mnt/disks/nameofthedisk: the discard operation is not supported fstrim: /mnt/disks/nameofthesecondpartitioniwouldguess: the discard operation is not supported Is there a way of getting rid of these messages / warnings? They seem to be sent from SSD trim scheduler, though I dont even get why that is the case. The connected disks were no SSDs but classic hard drives, they were also removed / unmounted correctly. Why trim? If i disable the trim scheduler, my SSDs will no longer get trimmed - seems no solution to me. If i leave it on, the messages will continuing bothering me. Only thing that helps so far is a server reboot. Is this a bug or a feature? Because no matter how, once I mount and unmount a disk with the UD plugin - result is some kind of a daily warning (because trim is scheduled daily). Honestly, not the end of the world but still quiet annoying. Would it be possible to "disconnect" the UD plugin from trim scheduler? Editing cron jobs? Any suggestions that might help (to stop the polution)? Thanks in advance!
  16. I guess I found the answere here: Also noticed that the docker.img size gets allocated to a fixed image size which is what I can see in the file system while "Container Size" just gives out what is really installed. Obvious that there must be a difference. Stopped the docker.img and rised allocation size from 20 to 30GB, so everything is set back to normal for now and the warning disappeard. There is just one little thing that still makes me wonder: If the content of the docker.img is about 12 GB and the allocated size is 20 GB, how can it be that I get a warning about 77% of usage? If I do calculate roughly, it would be around 60%. Current usage of the docker now shows 49%, although 12 from 30 GB makes 40%. Is this just a calculation error? Also still would like to know if there is a way to have a look into the content of the docker.img Any answers and explanations on that matter still more than welcome!
  17. Today my unRaid 6.7.0 spit out a warning about my docker.img. Docker high Image disk utilization: [date and time] Warning [name of my server] - Docker Image disk utilization of 77% Docker utilization of image file /mnt/user/system/docker/docker.img I was looking in the path stated in the warning and found my docker.img with a size of about 21 GB. What makes me wonder, is the fact, that using the button "Container Size" under the Docker-Tab gives me a cumulated size of about 11 GB on all containers installed. Where does a difference of 10 GB come from? Running "docker.ps" in the console also does not show anything that seems to be suspicious. Scrubing the docker.img in the Dashboard-tab also did not output any errors, alerts or something to work with. Any hints or suggestions on that matter? Is there a way or a command to inspect or show the content of the docker.img? Thanks in advance!
  18. Ok, I solved the problem and thought it might help to share this, just in case anyone is hazzling with similar problems. Sidenote: Digging a bit deeper in "the bond0-not-found"-problem in several other unRaid forum topics (and there a plenty of them!), it more or less always turned out, that there is something wrong with the USB-Stick (though I still do not get what causes a problem under 6.7 while it is working flawlessly under 6.6*). Anyway, I deciced to do a fresh and clean install of unRaid 6.6.7, using the unRaid USB-Creator from the download-section. - I made a backup of the "old" USB-Stick first - than wiped the USB-Stick and created a new 6.6.7 (on that same stick) with the unRaid USB-Creator - finally, I took the folder "config" from the previously made backup and put it back on the fresh USB-Stick, overwriting the existing folder (rest remained completely untouched) - put the stick back into the server and started it - after unRaid booted into 6.6.7, I repeated the update procedure with the web GUI (tool > update OS) to go for 6.7 - rebooted afterwards - surprise: 6.7 Don’t ask, I don’t get it! A fine USB-Stick under 6.6, not working under 6.7 … (Probably one of the downsides of running an OS from a USB-Stick. Just sort of being trustworthy, especially for a server, usually reyling on stability - but that might be just my personal opinion). I just hope the server remains stable (as it always used in the past) … Whatever: Thanks to everyone trying to help! Much appreciated Cheers, hi2hello
  19. Any ideas what else I could try or how to proceed? Wait for an update or contact support?
  20. Just one Ethernet-Port, true. Stick is labelled as it should be "UNRAID", all in capitals. Unfortunately I really do not have any USB 2.0 Ports available on my server. So i shutdown the system, copied all bz*-files from the zip on my mac to the stick, making sure to use an USB2-Port. Re-inserted it into the server, booted and what should I tell you? … Bond0 - Error No IP, no possibility to get any connection to the server (as before, not even localhost) except for the terminal. Even "diagnostics"-command throws errors and cannot be saved for further examination. df shows stick is not mounted. Also renamed the network.cfg and let unraid create a new one. Makes no difference: still Bond0-error. There wasn t even a new network.cfg created by unRaid. Rolled back to 6.6.7 - instantly works like a charm. df as expected, network connection present, … Propably have to wait for 6.7.1 and hope the issue will be resolved
  21. Wouldn’t that be the same than running an update? I suppose that If I ll do this the Server wont get up again, running into the exact same error than with updating via web GUI. Or what would be the difference? Don’t get me wrong, really happy to do so and also really appreciate your help, but already tried three updates via Web-GUI, which -to my understanding- replaced the BZ* type files on the boot stick (that should be identical to the one from the zip?!?). Also checked my network.cfg under 6.6. Nothing special in here. Or do you see anything, that could cause an error under 6.7? (Note: IPADDR[0], GATEWAY and DNS_SERVER1 anonymized, they are fine) # Generated settings: IFNAME[0]="br0" BRNAME[0]="br0" BRSTP[0]="no" BRFD[0]="0" BRNICS[0]="eth0" DESCRIPTION[0]="" USE_DHCP[0]="no" IPADDR[0]="***.***.*.**" NETMASK[0]="255.255.255.0" GATEWAY="***.***.*.*" DHCP_KEEPRESOLV="yes" DNS_SERVER1="***.***.*.**" DNS_SERVER2="8.8.8.8" DNS_SERVER3="" MTU[0]="1500" SYSNICS="1" Sorry to bother you, just try to understand what I’m doing, while doing!
  22. df shows that the stick does not get mounted under 6.7.0. (see my post #3 with the output of the df command above). Could you maybe be a bit more specific on what entries in the config/network.cfg could cause problems under 6.7.0 while being fine on 6.6? I d like to avoid setting up a new server config if possible. Thank you for your reply and the kind help
  23. The stick itself seems to be fine. It mounts under OS X without problems, no specific report when checking file system either. I will check the zip file and see If that helps. Thank you for the info and your help!
  24. I just found some time to have another look on that matter. The error can be reproduced (multiple times): As soon as I update to 6.7.0 and reboot, I m running into the same "bond0" error as described above. Rolling back to 6.6.7 (from the "previous" folder on the USB stick) and everything works as expected. I would really like to gain some further info but "running" 6.7.0 gives me errors on the "diagnostics" command, I also event don’t know where those infos are stored. Can’t find them when back on 6.6.7. So right now, I dont have the slightest clue on how to dive deeper to find or to help with error research. Here’s my server specs: unRAID server Basic, version 6.6.7 Motherboard:Gigabyte Technology Co., Ltd. - H270N-WIFI-CF Processor:Intel® Pentium® CPU G4560 @ 3.50GHz HVM:Enabled IOMMU:Enabled Cache:L1 Cache = 128 kB (max. capacity 128 kB) L2 Cache = 512 kB (max. capacity 512 kB) L3 Cache = 3072 kB (max. capacity 3072 kB) Memory:8 GB (max. installable capacity 64 GB) ChannelA-DIMM0 = 4096 MB, 2400 MT/s ChannelB-DIMM0 = 4096 MB, 2400 MT/s Network:eth0: 1000Mb/s, full duplex, mtu 1500 eth1: not connected Kernel:Linux 4.18.20-unRAID x86_64 OpenSSL:1.1.1a P + Q algorithm:12023 MB/s + 18421 MB/s
  25. Ok. I reverted from 6.7.0 to 6.6.7 by moving the content from the USB-Stick’s "Previous"-Folder to the root and overwriting existing files. Worked like a charm. Server back up. I guess I will wait for 6.7.1 though PS: Anything I can help with to get this fixed? Seems that I am not the only one having problems updating. Would you like my diagnostics file?