laest

Possibly the create new config tool could make a diff of the included disks in the old and new array config and check usage of removed disks in existing shares. But since the disk names/numbers are not unique that may not be precise enough. I don't know the mechanism behind the create new config tool. However, my problem is solved. Thank you very much for enlightening me and helping me out!

Solved my problem. Thank you very much for the assistance! Is this expected behaviour of the GUI or is it a bug? After changing the share.cfg the GUI worked as expected and I could make changes to the share as well as delete the share. Did I miss kind of an alert when creating the new array config or is there no check if there are shares left which make use of the removed disk?

Thanks for the hint. I tried to find the config in /etc/samba/smb.conf and /etc/samba/smb-config.conf # Generated settings: shareComment="omitted" shareInclude="disk2" shareExclude="" shareUseCache="no" shareCachePool="" shareCOW="auto" shareAllocator="highwater" shareSplitLevel="" shareFloor="97700000" shareExport="eh" shareCaseSensitive="auto" shareSecurity="private" shareReadList="" shareWriteList="user1,user2" shareVolsizelimit="" shareExportNFS="-" shareExportNFSFsid="0" shareSecurityNFS="public" shareHostListNFS="" Since the GUI does not show any disk in the dropdown (see screenshot in first post) is it safe to set „shareInclude“ to „“? I would stop the array before changing the config.

Hi everybody, I feel like I have kind of a stupid problem over here. I did remove a disk from my array, headed over to „tools - new config“ to reflect the removal in the config and rebuild parity. So far so good. Fix common problems plugin now states that I have a share which uses the removed disk. So I followed the guidance fix common problems gave me: However, I am not able to make any change in the affected share. No matter what I change in its config I only get the „done“ button activated, the „apply“ button will remain grey at all time. I did restarts of the array as well as restarts of the whole unraid server without any change. I tried disabling the vm and docker service just in case I missed a mount of the share into a docker container or vm but without any change in the error. I also tried to delete the share. I made sure that there is no single file remaining on the share via ssh and checked via „ls -la /mnt/user/affected-share“ but I can not select the delete checkbox in the share‘s config as it feels like the config of this share is stuck or something. So now I am hoping for a hint from the community. Hopefully one of you can help me out. I would appreciate if I won‘t need to add the removed disk again, rebuild parity, remove the share, remove the disk again, rebuild parity again. Thanks in advance and have a great day! Best regards Wolfgang

Danke für deine schnelle Rückmeldung und die Links. Das DS3H hatte ich auf dem Schirm, allerdings habe ich schon an 1-2 Stellen (unter anderem hier) folgendes gelesen und bin wieder davon abgekommen. ± 9W im Idle beim DS3H klingen schon gut. Laut diesem Post ist mit einem Kontron K3843-B in Kombination mit einem i3 12100 ± 3W drin. Habe dazu aber leider keine weiteren Aussagen gefunden, die das bestätigen oder widerlegen. Das würde bei 6W ca. 20€ Stromeinsparung pro Jahr bedeuten. Auf 4-5 Jahre gerechnet spart man da realistisch nicht wirklich Geld, aber das Kontron Board wäre damit über den Lifecycle allerdings auch nicht teuerer, weshalb es nach wie vor auf meiner Liste steht. Es kommt halt darauf an, ob das Board in irgendwelchen Punkten überlegen ist. Was mich außerdem noch umtreibt ist die Frage der Stromversorgung. Aus meinem Bauchgefühl heraus würde ich sagen, dass das 120W Pico-PSU ausreichen sollte, das wäre halt da bzw. durch das Replacement vom Salza 72W Netzteil würde ich hier zum Neukauf eines ATX PSU nochmal ca. ± 70€ sparen. Die gängigen NT-Rechner im Internet Spucken allerdings ganz andere Werte aus und empfehlen 350-400W Netzteile (mindestens) für CPU, 3x HDD, 1x SATA SSD, 2x M.2 SSD, 3x 120er FAN. Bzgl. dem RAM, wieso 1x 32GB statt 2x 16GB? Spart vermutlich nochmal ein bisschen Strom, aber man verliert Geschwindigkeit, weil Single-Channel. Oder übersehe ich hier etwas?

Hallo zusammen, seit Jahren nehme ich es mir vor - seit Jahren schiebe ich es immer wieder auf. Jetzt ist die Zeit für gute Vorsätze für 2025, also setze ich mich jetzt wirklich mal an ein neues Blech für mein UnRaid System. Ausgangssituation Case: Fractal Node 304 Mainboard: ASRock J5005 mITX CPU: Intel J5005 (embedded) RAM: Corsair Vengeance 32GB (2 x 16GB) SODIMM DDR4-2666 CL18 (CMSX32GX4M1A2666C18) HDD: 2x 3,5" WD Red 4TB, 1x 2,5" WD Red 1TB SSD: 1x Samsung Evo 850 500GB (Cache) PSU: Inter-Tech Pico-PSU 120W NT: Salcar 12V 72W Gebaut habe ich das als meinen ersten HomeServer Anfang 2018. Aus "ich lege da mal ein paar Daten ab" wurde entsprechend viel viel mehr,.. IT'ler Klarheit würde ich sagen... Use-Case Datengrab Docker (Nextcloud, Paperless, Plex und Co., Unmanic, Immich, Authentik, Outline, Bitwarden, AdGuard, Grafana, InfluxDB, Mealie und noch einiges mehr) VMs (FreeIPX Teleonanlage, Home Assistant) Ich merke im Alltag schon, dass die CPU für die aktuelle Nutzung nicht unbedingt ausgelegt ist. Gerade im VM-Bereich möchte ich noch mehr zum "Spielen" und für den Prod-Betrieb machen, bin da aktuell aber durch die CPU massiv limitiert. Transcoding in Plex und Unmanic klappen mit dem J5005 auch nur noch bedingt gut. Das J5005 hat mir gute Dienste erwiesen, allerdings würde ich jetzt doch ganz gerne auf mATX mit gewickelter CPU umsteigen, damit ich für die Zukunft wieder etwas Luft habe (Leistung und Erweiterbarkeit). Ziel-Konfiguration Case: Fractal Node 804 (habe ich seit Ende 2020 hier liegen,..) Mainboard: LGA 1700, sparsam aber vermutlich aus Kostengründen aus dem Consumer-Regal, mind. 4x Sata und 2x M.2 parallel nutzbar ohne C-States zu blockieren, gerne 4 Ram Slots - DDR4 oder DDR5 sind mir aktuell relativ egal, preislich nimmt sich das recht wenig CPU: i3 12100 (ggf. auch direkt einen i5 12400/12500 je nach Preis/Verfügbarkeit) -> Quick Sync CPU-Kühler: Für den Start Boxed oder direkt einen Noctua L9 RAM: 2x 16GB mit Mainboard kompatibel in 2er und 4er Bestückung, damit man später ggf. noch 2x 16GB nachrüsten kann HDD: bleibt erstmal vom Bestandssystem SSD: bleibt für den Start vom Bestandssystem, soll aber perspektivisch auf 2x M.2 SSD Cache Pool erweitert werden (Samsung oder Lexar?) PSU: Entweder bleibt das 120W Inter-Tech Pico-PSU mit einem neuen Leicke 120W 12V Netzteil oder ich kaufe ein z.B. Cooler Master MWE (laut Wolfgang's Channel eines der sparsamsten und dabei günstigsten Netzteile) Wünsche möglichst sparsam im Idle, nicht weil es auf jeden Cent ankommt, sondern weil es Spaß macht Zukunftssicherheit für 4-5 Jahre Gutes Preis-Leistungsverhältnis (AsRock Rack etc. sind toll, aber für meinen Use-Case zu teuer) Wobei könnt ihr mir nun helfen? Knackpunkt ist für mich aktuell ganz klar das Mainboard. Ich suche schon recht lange nach einem Mainboard, das die entsprechenden Anschlüsse hat, die ich gerne hätte und dabei sparsam ist. Im Internet findet man dazu leider meist wenige Infos, daher bin ich auf eure Erfahrungswerte angewiesen Als erste Idee hatte ich folgende Boards rausgesucht: Asus Prime H610M-A D4-CSM Asus Pro B760M-R Asus Pro B660M-C D4-CSM Pro B760M-C-CSM Asus PRO Q670M-C-CSM Kontron K3843-B Das Kontron hatte ich auf Grund der guten Verbrauchswerte schon vor einiger Zeit rausgesucht (wenn man dem Internet glauben schenkt und Kontron so weitermacht, wie Fujitsu bei den Boards. Was meint ihr zu meinem Vorhaben, meinen Gedanken und meiner ersten Sammlung an Hardware? Habe ich was übersehen, was mir einen sauberen Stromverbraucht bzw. gute C-State Möglichkeiten verbaut? Gibt es bessere Technik (Preis-Leistung)? Danke euch vorab und noch ein schönes Restwochenende! Wolfi

Hi everybody! I am currently trying to get Joplin server up and running on my Unraid server. The problem isn't the seperate portgresDB oder the Joplin server itself, but the reverse proxy configuration (I use swag as nginx reverse proxy). If I set my unraid server IP as BASE_URL of joplin server, I can access http://UNRAIDIP:22300/login an everything works as expected. As soon as I change the BASE_URL to https://joplin.domain.com and add an proxy-conf for joplin server, I get an error like invalid origin. Anybody got this up and running behind a reverse proxy? Thanks in advance and have a nice day!

Hi aremack, have you been successfull in running joplin with reverse proxy? I am trying to get it running behind swag nginx proxy with no success,..

Thanks for the template. Is there any way to use authentication with the self-hostet version? Thanks in advance for any hint

First of all, thank you for providing us this Template I just installed it and have one question: As far as I know papermerge should come with German and English lanugage support. But after installing your template all I can select for interface language as well as OCR language is English. Is there a way to integrate support for German language? Best regards!

if anybody else is looking for a working reverse proxy config, here is a config that works fine for me. This one is based on the template of wekans github pages. All you have to do is to change the domain names in lines 12, 16, 23 and the internal IP of your Unraid server in line 38. # this section is needed to proxy web-socket connections map $http_upgrade $connection_upgrade { default upgrade; '' close; } # HTTP server { listen 80; # if this is not a default server, remove "default_server" listen [::]:80 ipv6only=on; server_name wekan.your-domain.com; # redirect non-SSL to SSL location / { rewrite ^ https://wekan.your-domain.com$request_uri? permanent; } } # HTTPS server server { listen 443 ssl http2; # we enable HTTP/2 here (previously SPDY) server_name wekan.your-domain.com; # this domain must match Common Name (CN) in the SSL certificate include /config/nginx/ssl.conf; # If your application is not compatible with IE <= 10, this will redirect visitors to a page advising a browser update # This works because IE 11 does not present itself as MSIE anymore if ($http_user_agent ~ "MSIE" ) { return 303 https://browser-update.org/update.html; } # Pass requests to Wekan. # If you have Wekan at https://example.com/wekan , change location to: # location /wekan { location / { # proxy_pass http://192.xxx.xxx.xxx:5555/wekan; proxy_pass http://192.xxx.xxx.xxx:5555; #Change to your internal unraid IP and the Wekan container port proxy_http_version 1.1; proxy_set_header Upgrade $http_upgrade; # allow websockets proxy_set_header Connection $connection_upgrade; proxy_set_header X-Forwarded-For $remote_addr; # preserve client IP # this setting allows the browser to cache the application in a way compatible with Meteor # on every applicaiton update the name of CSS and JS file is different, so they can be cache infinitely (here: 30 days) # the root path (/) MUST NOT be cached #if ($uri != '/wekan') { # expires 30d; #} } }

I just re-flashed my cc2531 stick and the error does not occur again. Don‘t really know why this helped since the cc2531 worked well with the initial firmware on my old raspberry pi.

My device ID is changing without the device being unplugged and reconnected. So I cannot use the USB Device at all :( Would be great if somebody could help us with a solution! :)

Does nobody have any idea?

Hi everybody! I am trying to passthrough a CC2531 Zigbee USB stick for days now. As you might expect, without any success. My investigations led me to the following problem that might cause the initial problem with passing through the USB device. If I do a 'lsusb' to list the USB devices, the Zigbee stick shows up as "Texas Instruments ....." but as you can see from the attached screenshot, the Zigbee stick's device ID constantly changes every minute. The stick itself is plugged in the same USB port the whole time. Sometimes it even looses connection to UnRaid I guess, because it does not show up in the output. Is there any trick get UnRaid to not change the device ID every minute? I guess this would help a lot to get the Zigbee stick passed through to my VM or a Docker container in the future. Thanks in advance! P.S.: UnRaid is running on a Asrock J5005-ITX board. I tried multiple of the board's USB ports, 2.0 as well as 3.0 ports, with the same result. Also wanted to pass through the whole PCI controller, but since the board only seems to have one, this is not possible. Even if the output says there are two buses, the Zigbee stick always shows up below bus 001, no matter what USB port I plug it in.

Did you manage to find a solution for this? I also would like to install ecoDMS on Unraid but since it seems not to work properly,.. Edit: Okay got it up and running on UnRaid 6.8.0 with the following steps: Via Community Applications search for ecodms and install the converted Synology/QNAP version allinone 18.09 In the configuration page add the following path and port mappings (see attached screenshot) Download and install the ecoDMS client for your platform (Client Downloads here: EcoDMS) Add a new profile with your UnRaid IP, 17001 as port and login with ecodms as both, user and password. You can change this one you are logged in If the profile is created successfully connect to the new ecoDMS connection If you want to use the web interface of ecoDMS navigate to Settings -> Web/Mobile/API, enable remote access and start the service. Once the service started you should be able to access the web interface via your UnRaid-IP on Port 17004 (or whatever port you chose during setup of the Docker Container. Have fun

Hello everybody! As many other guys I followed Spaceinvaders Tutorial and set up OpenVPN on my UnRaid NAS. Connecting to my NAS from outside the Network works, but I do not have access to the UnRaid shares or other devices in the host's network. My setup is as follows: Location 1: NAS with UnRaid OS, OpenVPN set up, Fritzbox 7590 with Subnet 192.168.188.0 Location 2: Fritzbox 7590 with Subnet 192.168.188.0, MacOS Client -> can connect to NAS via OpenVPN, but cannot access shares or the Fritzbox of the UnRaid Host Network I found out, that when connected via OpenVPN the MacBook's IP Adress is 172.xxx.xxx.xxx. In the OpenVPN Admin Interface I found the following: Dynamic IP Adress Network: 172.27.224.0/20 Group Default IP Address Network (Optional): 172.27.240.0/20 Routing (Yes, NAT): 192.168.122.0/24, 192.168.188.0/24, 172.17.0.0/16 Should client Internet traffic be routed through the VPN? YES Should clients be allowed to access network services on the VPN gateway IP address? YES Do not alter clients' DNS server settings: NO Have clients use the same DNS servers as the Access Server host: YES Have clients use specific DNS servers: NO Can you help me out? I just want to access my UnRaid Shares via OpenVPN from outside the LAN of the UnRaid NAS. Thanks in advance! //EDIT: Found the solution by myself,.. stupid me 😮 -> Changed the Subnet of the second Location to 192.168.178.0, so now it is working perfectly