May 22, 201610 yr i cant find the link anymore but i can share it. https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BwQ2re4__H3HQTUyWEZFS0lsZ00
May 22, 201610 yr i cant find the link anymore but i can share it. https://drive.google.com/open?id=0BwQ2re4__H3HQTUyWEZFS0lsZ00 Thanks, working again
May 23, 201610 yr Anyone got a working link for an older version of the client? Mine also stopped working after update......
June 3, 201610 yr In China dynamic dns is blocked in almost all cases. Can I use the openvpn server without dynamic dns? When creating the .opvn file, it seems to put the dynamic dns in the server.opvn file. If I didn't have the dynamic dns being used, would it still work? Each time the wan ip address changes, would the .opvn file need to be recreated?
June 4, 201610 yr In China dynamic dns is blocked in almost all cases. Can I use the openvpn server without dynamic dns? Each time the wan ip address changes, would the .opvn file need to be recreated? And my external wan ip address seems to change on a daily basis with no power cycling of the modem or router. ...UGGGHH...
June 6, 201610 yr Yeah, you'd need to recreate the OVPN file. That's just a general open VPN thing. Your vpn will pass requests to the IP thats configured, the DNS just lets you make sure the IP configured is always yours. In China dynamic dns is blocked in almost all cases. Can I use the openvpn server without dynamic dns? Each time the wan ip address changes, would the .opvn file need to be recreated? And my external wan ip address seems to change on a daily basis with no power cycling of the modem or router. ...UGGGHH...
June 10, 201610 yr Yeah, you'd need to recreate the OVPN file. That's just a general open VPN thing. Your vpn will pass requests to the IP thats configured, the DNS just lets you make sure the IP configured is always yours. OK, the dynamic DNS is solved but I am having trouble connecting to the VPN server in China. I get no connection, and various other errors that seem to be related to no connectivity. Yet from the China office I can use my laptop to connect to another OpenVPN unRaid server in America without issue. How can I troubleshoot?? Possibly related issue Background: My China office dd-wrt router is setup with PPOE and gets a wan IP address that is different from the actual external IP address reported from whatismyip.org, or IP Echo Service Since this usually means a dual nat caused by another router in the modem, and could block VPN connectivity, I had China Telecom change out the fiber modem for another one, but still get this same 2 different WAN IP problem. They insist that the different IP problem is not from the modem. Is the 2 different WAN IP issue normal for PPOE connections in China? Likely I am missing something very simple and completely different. This is fiber here in China, and our offices connected with fiber in the USA always have the same IP address reported to the router even if we aren't using static IP addresses. both unRaid 6.1.9 & 6.2.b21 running 2.3.11 openvpnserver.
June 10, 201610 yr China office dd-wrt router is setup with PPOE and gets a wan IP address that is different from the actual external IP address reported from whatismyip.org, or IP Echo Service Since this usually means a dual nat caused by another router in the modem, and could block VPN connectivity, I had China Telecom change out the fiber modem for another one, but still get this same 2 different WAN IP problem. They insist that the different IP problem is not from the modem. Is the 2 different WAN IP issue normal for PPOE connections in China? It seems like I have been introduced to GG-NAT or Large Scale NAT. "it makes it impossible to host services" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrier-grade_NAT Confirming....
June 13, 201610 yr On unRAID 6.2b23 OpenVPN does not start for me on a reboot. I get this error in syslog. Diagnostics attached. Jun 13 17:18:12 Pithos root: Starting OpenVPN Server Jun 13 17:18:12 Pithos root: Starting Openvpn server..... Jun 13 17:18:13 Pithos sudo: root : TTY=unknown ; PWD=/ ; USER=root ; COMMAND=/usr/sbin/openvpn --writepid /var/run/openvpnserver/openvpnserver.pid --config /mnt/disks/vmdisk/plugins/openvpn/openvpnserver.ovpn --script-security 2 --daemon Jun 13 17:18:13 Pithos avahi-daemon[13881]: Service "Pithos" (/services/ssh.service) successfully established. Jun 13 17:18:13 Pithos avahi-daemon[13881]: Service "Pithos" (/services/smb.service) successfully established. Jun 13 17:18:13 Pithos avahi-daemon[13881]: Service "Pithos" (/services/sftp-ssh.service) successfully established. Jun 13 17:18:14 Pithos root: An error occurred, server not started!. More info in /var/log/openvpnserver.log or /var/local/emhttp/plugins/openvpnserver/openvpnserver.out Jun 13 17:18:14 Pithos emhttp: Any ideas why it isn't starting? EDIT: Output from /var/local/emhttp/plugins/openvpnserver/openvpnserver.out Options error: In [CMD-LINE]:1: Error opening configuration file: /mnt/disks/vmdisk/plugins/openvpn/openvpnserver.ovpn Use --help for more information. I guess my UD mount is not mounting fast enough?
June 13, 201610 yr Issue #2: I can start the OpenVPN server manually; however, once I connect my phone to the VPN I can only access my unRAID webGUI. I cannot remote desktop or access my router on that same network. This was working just fine with the same settings on Version 6.1.9 so I wonder if the new ethernet settings on b23 are conflicting with this plugin? EDIT: Just noticed that I can only access the unRAID webGUI. All other traffic including a google search or local network (ie router page) do not load.
June 14, 201610 yr Author I will take s look at this after my work, just started ;-) but something have been change , I facing same issue on my side . Skickat från min iPhone med Tapatalk
June 14, 201610 yr I will take s look at this after my work, just started ;-) but something have been change , I facing same issue on my side . Skickat från min iPhone med Tapatalk Happy to hear it's a common issue and not the normal archedraft is "special" issue.
June 14, 201610 yr China office dd-wrt router is setup with PPOE and gets a wan IP address that is different from the actual external IP address reported from whatismyip.org, or IP Echo Service Since this usually means a dual nat caused by another router in the modem, and could block VPN connectivity, I had China Telecom change out the fiber modem for another one, but still get this same 2 different WAN IP problem. They insist that the different IP problem is not from the modem. Is the 2 different WAN IP issue normal for PPOE connections in China? It seems like I have been introduced to GG-NAT or Large Scale NAT. "it makes it impossible to host services" https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Carrier-grade_NAT Confirming.... To get out from behind CG-NAT you can either get a static IP, (triples this cost of the internet so no go), or use IPV6. I see unRaid is still not supporting IPV6. Assuming that unRaid gets IPV6 support, could this OpenVPN plugin offer support? I see that from version 2.3.0 there is full support for ipv6 in openvpn.
June 14, 201610 yr Author Assuming that unRaid gets IPV6 support, could this OpenVPN plugin offer support? I see that from version 2.3.0 there is full support for ipv6 in openvpn. Absolutely the plugin would support it, I will look at it when its' enabled in unRAID. //Peter
June 14, 201610 yr Author I will take s look at this after my work, just started ;-) but something have been change , I facing same issue on my side . Skickat från min iPhone med Tapatalk Happy to hear it's a common issue and not the normal archedraft is "special" issue. I have soon a solution of the problem, but can you that have issues in beta23 send me your contents of /boot/config/network.cfg //Peter
June 14, 201610 yr I have soon a solution of the problem, but can you that have issues in beta23 send me your contents of /boot/config/network.cfg //Peter Absolutely: # Generated settings: IFNAME[0]="br0" BONDNAME[0]="bond0" BONDING_MIIMON[0]="100" BRNAME[0]="br0" BRSTP[0]="no" BRFD[0]="0" BONDING_MODE[0]="1" BONDNICS[0]="eth0" BRNICS[0]="bond0" DESCRIPTION[0]="br0" USE_DHCP[0]="yes" DHCP_KEEPRESOLV="no" MTU[0]="" SYSNICS="1"
June 15, 201610 yr Author Peter, are you also having the same issue with the plugin starting at boot? No I haven't, the plugin starts automatic. //Peter
June 15, 201610 yr Author There is a new version of the server plugin that should work with the latest beta. //Peter
June 15, 201610 yr There is a new version of the server plugin that should work with the latest beta. Update fixed all the network issues I had to change my plugin location to my cache drive instead of an UD disk for this plugin to start after a boot but that's fine. Thanks!
June 16, 201610 yr I have the same issue as archedraft. After I connect to openVPN I can only access local addresses via IP such as my router and unraid GUI, anything that goes out to the internet fails to work. I am currently on 6.2.0-beta23 and 2016.06.15 of openVPN server. Here is my network.cfg if that helps # Generated settings: USE_DHCP="yes" IPADDR="192.168.137.30" NETMASK="255.255.255.0" GATEWAY="192.168.137.1" DHCP_KEEPRESOLV="no" DNS_SERVER1="192.168.137.1" DNS_SERVER2="" DNS_SERVER3="" BONDING="no" BONDING_MODE="1" Any help would be great, thanks!
June 16, 201610 yr Author Can you add result for command ifconfig and add a screenshot of the settings at the gui?
June 16, 201610 yr Author And the network config looks not the that I have seen from other 6.2 beta 23!!
June 16, 201610 yr ifconfig: root@Takoyaki:~# ifconfig docker0: flags=4099<UP,BROADCAST,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 172.17.0.1 netmask 255.255.0.0 broadcast 0.0.0.0 ether 02:42:75:a1:81:7b txqueuelen 0 (Ethernet) RX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 0 bytes 0 (0.0 B) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 eth0: flags=4163<UP,BROADCAST,RUNNING,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 192.168.1.77 netmask 255.255.255.0 broadcast 192.168.1.255 ether 9c:b6:54:04:5e:a2 txqueuelen 1000 (Ethernet) RX packets 463288 bytes 539603983 (514.6 MiB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 461869 bytes 536684656 (511.8 MiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 device interrupt 18 lo: flags=73<UP,LOOPBACK,RUNNING> mtu 65536 inet 127.0.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.255 loop txqueuelen 1 (Local Loopback) RX packets 16414 bytes 3105305 (2.9 MiB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 16414 bytes 3105305 (2.9 MiB) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 tun0: flags=4305<UP,POINTOPOINT,RUNNING,NOARP,MULTICAST> mtu 1500 inet 10.8.0.1 netmask 255.255.255.0 destination 10.8.0.1 unspec 00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00-00 txqueuelen 100 (UNSPEC) RX packets 549 bytes 42122 (41.1 KiB) RX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 frame 0 TX packets 9 bytes 810 (810.0 B) TX errors 0 dropped 0 overruns 0 carrier 0 collisions 0 Screenshots attached. Not sure why my network.cfg is so different, I upgraded from 6.1.9 to the latest 6.2 beta just this morning.
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.