November 8, 201411 yr Considering you are comparing us to valve, I'll take that as a compliment. ;-) Never had a crash or any data loss. Nothing is actually broken in your current beta And you keep hinting and teasing of things to come.
November 9, 201411 yr Considering you are comparing us to valve, I'll take that as a compliment. ;-) Never had a crash or any data loss. Nothing is actually broken in your current beta And you keep hinting and teasing of things to come. unHALFLIFE3?
November 9, 201411 yr Considering you are comparing us to valve, I'll take that as a compliment. ;-) Never had a crash or any data loss. Nothing is actually broken in your current beta And you keep hinting and teasing of things to come. unHALFLIFE3? Well you can count to 3 and valve can't. So we do know something will come
November 12, 201411 yr We have made a ton of progress in the past week. I'll post a status update in the announcement forum later today with some details.
November 12, 201411 yr We have made a ton of progress in the past week. I'll post a status update in the announcement forum later today with some details. Cant wait to see whats after being done. Roll on unElec. I retired my HTPC WAY too soon so I'm hoping its not going to be long more
November 12, 201411 yr We have made a ton of progress in the past week. I'll post a status update in the announcement forum later today with some details. That's what you said last week and the week before that...
November 12, 201411 yr Maybe LT just works on Island Time and we just don't have our expectations adjusted accordingly http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=island%20time
November 12, 201411 yr Valve time boys. He clearly works on valve time https://developer.valvesoftware.com/wiki/Valve_Time
November 12, 201411 yr I am pretty sure I read somewhere that LT is funded by the government as a social experiment... 7 years and counting!
November 13, 201411 yr unRAID 6 Beta-Next update http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=36237.0
November 13, 201411 yr unRAID 6 Beta-Next update http://lime-technology.com/forum/index.php?topic=36237.0 Thanks weebo! Was about to cross post here as well, but saw you beat me to it!
November 13, 201411 yr Having been around here a while, I'm resigned to the long wait cycle and dashed hopes of delivery. However, there's a snippet in those summary release notes that confirms one of the reasons I stick with unRAID; linux: added driver: SCSI_HPTIOP: support for HighPoint RocketRAID 3xxx/4xxx controllers, per customer request. The ongoing willingness to add in seemingly minor tweaks like this for the benefit of a minority of customers is a real plus. This isn't my request, but I've benefited from this policy in the past and I just wanted to say thanks. Peter
November 13, 201411 yr With the new beta saying that mail notifications and similar will be included, does this deprecate some of the recommended plugins from the new server configuration guide (such as the plugins in "Install and Configure Mail and SSMTP")?
November 13, 201411 yr Having been around here a while, I'm resigned to the long wait cycle and dashed hopes of delivery. However, there's a snippet in those summary release notes that confirms one of the reasons I stick with unRAID; linux: added driver: SCSI_HPTIOP: support for HighPoint RocketRAID 3xxx/4xxx controllers, per customer request. The ongoing willingness to add in seemingly minor tweaks like this for the benefit of a minority of customers is a real plus. This isn't my request, but I've benefited from this policy in the past and I just wanted to say thanks. Peter Right, but if they built the kernel with every storage driver available as a module then unraid would support the devices by default instead of requiring customers requesting it. I realize that would take up some space but that shouldn't add that much to the image size. Perhaps have modules available as a remounted subdir off the flash drive so it wouldn't increase the root image.
November 13, 201411 yr Having been around here a while, I'm resigned to the long wait cycle and dashed hopes of delivery. However, there's a snippet in those summary release notes that confirms one of the reasons I stick with unRAID; linux: added driver: SCSI_HPTIOP: support for HighPoint RocketRAID 3xxx/4xxx controllers, per customer request. The ongoing willingness to add in seemingly minor tweaks like this for the benefit of a minority of customers is a real plus. This isn't my request, but I've benefited from this policy in the past and I just wanted to say thanks. Peter Right, but if they built the kernel with every storage driver available as a module then unraid would support the devices by default instead of requiring customers requesting it. I realize that would take up some space but that shouldn't add that much to the image size. Perhaps have modules available as a remounted subdir off the flash drive so it wouldn't increase the root image. Sometimes modules may conflict, creating issues instead of resolving them. Just throwing everything and the kitchen sink into our kernel as modules isn't a good idea. Just an FYI and not looking to get into a technical debate over this practice.
November 13, 201411 yr Having been around here a while, I'm resigned to the long wait cycle and dashed hopes of delivery. However, there's a snippet in those summary release notes that confirms one of the reasons I stick with unRAID; linux: added driver: SCSI_HPTIOP: support for HighPoint RocketRAID 3xxx/4xxx controllers, per customer request. The ongoing willingness to add in seemingly minor tweaks like this for the benefit of a minority of customers is a real plus. This isn't my request, but I've benefited from this policy in the past and I just wanted to say thanks. Peter Right, but if they built the kernel with every storage driver available as a module then unraid would support the devices by default instead of requiring customers requesting it. I realize that would take up some space but that shouldn't add that much to the image size. Perhaps have modules available as a remounted subdir off the flash drive so it wouldn't increase the root image. Sometimes modules may conflict, creating issues instead of resolving them. Just throwing everything and the kitchen sink into our kernel as modules isn't a good idea. Just an FYI and not looking to get into a technical debate over this practice. Right, which is why I'd go with a real distro such as Centos / Redhat / Ubuntu that does all of this extensive testing for you. If they ship with the drivers built as modules on their base images then you know there's no troublesome conflicts.
November 13, 201411 yr Having been around here a while, I'm resigned to the long wait cycle and dashed hopes of delivery. However, there's a snippet in those summary release notes that confirms one of the reasons I stick with unRAID; linux: added driver: SCSI_HPTIOP: support for HighPoint RocketRAID 3xxx/4xxx controllers, per customer request. The ongoing willingness to add in seemingly minor tweaks like this for the benefit of a minority of customers is a real plus. This isn't my request, but I've benefited from this policy in the past and I just wanted to say thanks. Peter Right, but if they built the kernel with every storage driver available as a module then unraid would support the devices by default instead of requiring customers requesting it. I realize that would take up some space but that shouldn't add that much to the image size. Perhaps have modules available as a remounted subdir off the flash drive so it wouldn't increase the root image. Sometimes modules may conflict, creating issues instead of resolving them. Just throwing everything and the kitchen sink into our kernel as modules isn't a good idea. Just an FYI and not looking to get into a technical debate over this practice. Right, which is why I'd go with a real distro such as Centos / Redhat / Ubuntu that does all of this extensive testing for you. If they ship with the drivers built as modules on their base images then you know there's no troublesome conflicts. Meh, that's your opinion.
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.