PeterNet Posted September 12, 2020 Author Share Posted September 12, 2020 28 minutes ago, trurl said: Go to Main - Array Operation and Stop the array. Then get 2 screenshots from Settings and post them, Disk Settings and Global Share Settings. Done and here they are: Quote Link to comment
trurl Posted September 12, 2020 Share Posted September 12, 2020 I don't see it on yours either. Not sure how yours got set to no or how to change it to yes except maybe editing the file on flash and rebooting. Quote Link to comment
Squid Posted September 12, 2020 Share Posted September 12, 2020 It's not showing up because the cache drive won't mount. Sep 12 21:27:40 Tower emhttpd: cache TotDevices: 2 Sep 12 21:27:40 Tower emhttpd: cache NumDevices: 1 Sep 12 21:27:40 Tower emhttpd: cache NumFound: 1 Sep 12 21:27:40 Tower emhttpd: cache NumMissing: 1 Sep 12 21:27:40 Tower emhttpd: cache NumMisplaced: 0 Sep 12 21:27:40 Tower emhttpd: cache NumExtra: 0 Sep 12 21:27:40 Tower emhttpd: cache LuksState: 0 Sep 12 21:27:40 Tower emhttpd: shcmd (35): mount -t btrfs -o noatime,nodiratime,degraded -U d8be6f35-ac46-47dc-a436-08b47efeb1e5 /mnt/cache Sep 12 21:27:40 Tower kernel: BTRFS info (device sdb1): allowing degraded mounts Sep 12 21:27:40 Tower kernel: BTRFS info (device sdb1): disk space caching is enabled Sep 12 21:27:40 Tower kernel: BTRFS info (device sdb1): has skinny extents Sep 12 21:27:40 Tower kernel: BTRFS warning (device sdb1): devid 1 uuid e6e2a765-5a51-4852-8f25-ad8b47d3de4b is missing ### [PREVIOUS LINE REPEATED 1 TIMES] ### Sep 12 21:27:40 Tower kernel: BTRFS warning (device sdb1): chunk 4384096256 missing 1 devices, max tolerance is 0 for writeable mount Sep 12 21:27:40 Tower kernel: BTRFS warning (device sdb1): writeable mount is not allowed due to too many missing devices Sep 12 21:27:40 Tower root: mount: /mnt/cache: wrong fs type, bad option, bad superblock on /dev/sdb1, missing codepage or helper program, or other error. 1 Quote Link to comment
PeterNet Posted September 12, 2020 Author Share Posted September 12, 2020 2 minutes ago, Squid said: It's not showing up because the cache drive won't mount. That's strange. It was up and running before. I will try the Single cache drive mode and see what happens for this matter. Quote Link to comment
PeterNet Posted September 12, 2020 Author Share Posted September 12, 2020 Removed the cache drive that didn't mount and running with a single drive cache now. Copying gets still the same result. No activity on Cache. Also attaching a new Diagnostics file. tower-diagnostics-20200912-2255.zip Quote Link to comment
trurl Posted September 12, 2020 Share Posted September 12, 2020 You still have no /mnt/user0 which would be expected if cache were participating in user shares. Try editing config/shares.cfg on flash drive. Change this shareCacheEnabled="no" to this shareCacheEnabled="yes" You might be able to make this edit from command line or in mc with the server still running and then just stop and start the array to get it to take effect. 1 Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted September 13, 2020 Share Posted September 13, 2020 10 hours ago, trurl said: Not sure how yours got set to no or how to change it to yes except maybe editing the file on flash and rebooting. Yeah, it's a known bug, for now it needs to be done manually. Quote Link to comment
PeterNet Posted September 13, 2020 Author Share Posted September 13, 2020 8 hours ago, trurl said: You still have no /mnt/user0 which would be expected if cache were participating in user shares. Try editing config/shares.cfg on flash drive. Change this shareCacheEnabled="no" to this shareCacheEnabled="yes" You might be able to make this edit from command line or in mc with the server still running and then just stop and start the array to get it to take effect. Aww, now it worked! The files are first stored in the cache drive. Activating Mover will then move the files to HDD array. Perfect!! Quote Link to comment
PeterNet Posted September 13, 2020 Author Share Posted September 13, 2020 30 minutes ago, JorgeB said: Yeah, it's a known bug, for now it needs to be done manually. Wonder why this hasn't been taken care of yet. Should be a simple thing, I guess... Quote Link to comment
JorgeB Posted September 13, 2020 Share Posted September 13, 2020 Just now, PeterNet said: Wonder why this hasn't been taken care of yet. Because it was only found and reported on the latest beta, it should be fixed on the next one. 1 Quote Link to comment
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.
Note: Your post will require moderator approval before it will be visible.