ChatNoir

This maybe ?

While by no means guaranteed, something might show on the logs before the crash. Set up a syslog server and post the file after a crash. Your diagnostics would offer more details on your config and might show something ?

Maybe this ?

What version of the plugin ? What version of Unraid ? Your diagnostics catched after the issue could help the team identify the issue.

So the emulated drive is unmoutable ? If so, a rebuilt will rebuilt an unmoutable file system. In any case, please attach your diagnostics to your next post ; preferably before rebooting.

Did you install Unassigned Devices before trying to install it's optional 'preclear' option ? I suspect that it might be a pre-requisite.

It could be because one drive was dropped and reconnected with another ID ? Jun 7 09:12:39 sobnology emhttpd: error: hotplug_devices, 1719: No such file or directory (2): Error: tagged device WDC_WD40EFAX-68JH4N0_WD-WX42D10HZ4Y5 was (sdl) is now (sdo) Jun 7 09:12:39 sobnology emhttpd: read SMART /dev/sdo Jun 7 09:12:39 sobnology kernel: emhttpd[9123]: segfault at 618 ip 0000000000413e00 sp 00007ffc61d1f590 error 4 in emhttpd[403000+1d000] Jun 7 09:12:39 sobnology kernel: Code: c0 75 15 48 c7 45 f8 84 41 42 00 48 c7 45 f0 73 41 42 00 e9 50 01 00 00 8b 45 ec 89 c7 e8 42 ba ff ff 48 89 45 d8 48 8b 45 d8 <8b> 80 18 06 00 00 85 c0 74 17 48 8b 45 d8 48 8b 80 68 06 00 00 48

This means that the file already exist on the destination. The mover will never overwrite an existing file. You will have to determine what is the more recent file and delete the other one.

Indeed, thank you both. The Community and Unraid will not be the same without the great work you do. 🤘

Please either : post in General Support using English or post in the German subsection

Nerd tools is a Community Plugin, you should ask the maintainer in the support thread. This section is for requests to be integrated by Lime Technology on the core Unraid.

it's a x4 card, it seems that your motherboard can only accept x1 as the connector seems closed. You can modify the PCIE connector, but there is some risk and there are x1 options not that much more expensive : https://it.aliexpress.com/item/1005003338978087.html?spm=a2g0o.productlist.0.0.5b13d708c8ae9w&algo_pvid=34546497-4560-40a2-892e-d192f25b3265&algo_exp_id=34546497-4560-40a2-892e-d192f25b3265-1&pdp_ext_f={"sku_id"%3A"12000025302273431"}&pdp_npi=2%40dis!EUR!!31.52!!!!!%402132a24e16545061172396671e19bd!12000025302273431!sea https://it.aliexpress.com/item/1005003428156306.html?spm=a2g0o.productlist.0.0.5b13d708c8ae9w&algo_pvid=34546497-4560-40a2-892e-d192f25b3265&algo_exp_id=34546497-4560-40a2-892e-d192f25b3265-0&pdp_ext_f={"sku_id"%3A"12000025738715316"}&pdp_npi=2%40dis!EUR!!31.04!!!!!%402132a24e16545061172396671e19bd!12000025738715316!sea

With 10 SATA ports, it must be using a port multipler since ASM1166 can only manage 6 ports. I was mistaking above, ASM1061 is NOT a good option for 6 ports either, it's a 2 SATA ports controller. I'll correct my initial post (and your quote as not to induce confusion). If you want 6 ports, select a controller that can handle 6 ports. There is not way to magically handle more without port multipler on SATA cards.

Yes.

It seems that the changes.txt files should also be copied.

This is exactly what is recommended against. It uses a JMB575 port multiplier that is known for bad performance. Since you would be using that on a single 2.0 lane, I would guess that is would be even worse. On the very same page you linked, I saw options for only ASM1166 or ASM1061 on a x1. You should go with that. https://www.amazon.com/MZHOU-Profile-Bracket-Support-Devices/dp/B097RBLM9G/ref=sr_1_3?keywords=MZHOU%2BPCIe%2BSATA%2BCard&qid=1654493546&sr=8-3&th=1 edit : I did not try that card myself, my answer is purely based on what is indicated on the Amazon page.

That's a question only JorgeB can answer. I would suggest that you wait for him to connect.

Could be the CPU too, as that memory controller is in the CPU, not the Motherboard. Hopefully, it's only the MB.

Your first step would be to look at that : For both memory speed and power state. As for FCP reports, the MCE seems harmless, but you should probably act on those : Jun 5 04:41:06 Tower root: Fix Common Problems: Other Warning: Mover logging is enabled Jun 5 04:41:07 Tower root: Fix Common Problems: Other Warning: Background notifications not enabled Mover logging is only useful for debugging why mover does not do what you want. It should be OFF otherwise as it tends to spam the log for no reason. You should really set up notifications so that you are alerted immediately when Unraid detects an issue. Acting soon will keep your data safer than doing nothing and realizing too late that the system had issues for weeks and finally failed. If the issues continue after the changes from the FAQ, you should set up a syslog server and post that file after the next crash/reboot.

You should probably read the release details : Certain combinaison of hardware, drivers and possibly BIOS were corrupting data. 6.10.2 was pushed to prevent data loss for the users at risk while investigations are on going. If you require more information, ask away. I will not be able to answer, but someone with more knowledge probably can.

I do not use RSYNC but the result would probably change depending of the command you are using. You should share an exemple of your command. Did you set up a Minimum free space for your cache Pool ? This should solve your problem As a general rule, you should not cache a share if you regularly add more data than the cache pool can hold.

That's probably a question that @ljm42 can clarify.

He has no internet at home and hopes to update both Unraid plus dockers and plugins at a friend's house using only the flashdrive. I do not think it is possible. Maybe the plugins ? For the containers though, the "program" is installed on the drives themselves.

Your syslog is being spammed by : Jun 4 04:43:06 mnemosyne kernel: usb 1-14: new full-speed USB device number 75 using xhci_hcd Jun 4 04:43:06 mnemosyne kernel: Bluetooth: hci0: Reading Intel version information failed (-22) Jun 4 04:43:06 mnemosyne kernel: Bluetooth: hci0: Intel Read version failed (-22) Jun 4 04:43:06 mnemosyne kernel: Bluetooth: hci0: Intel reset sent to retry FW download Jun 4 04:43:06 mnemosyne kernel: usb 1-14: USB disconnect, device number 75 Are you trying to use a BT device ?

Is the BIOS set up to boot automatically ? In any case, you can start to check the power states and update BIOS if its not the latest. I see that you did set up a syslog server, I did not see anything relevant there, but maybe someone else can.