cybrnook

I trust/hope now that the ground work is laid out, he will have a quick one liner in the 11 release "adjusted permissions for linux builds". What are you doing to work around it? Are you just passing an additional --device in the gui, or are you adjusting a script within your container?

See you making progress in there. Seems the root cause was nailed down today :-)

@Djoss 1.10.10 seems to be out : https://www.makemkv.com/forum2/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=224&sid=b580bf9325d77c6b0391be68408b11cf EDIT: Scratch that, seems to be still not fixed: https://www.makemkv.com/forum2/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=16939&start=15 Might as well set your main image to 8.

Yep, will just hang back and watch the makemkv thread where DJoss is at: https://www.makemkv.com/forum2/viewtopic.php?f=3&t=16939&sid=eed59b6f6bddfb826995145685a6adc1

@Djoss I dropped back to your jlesage/makemkv:v1.5.1 and that let me downgrade so my Asus USB Blu-ray was detected again. I am getting an "update" notification now for your Docker on the 1.51 branch, is this correct?

Just came here to note the same. EDIT: AND Drive is detected again :-) I assume when an update comes out to fix this, you will update the main repo and have us set it back to jlesage/makemkv ?

I don't think they have a native linux server compiled. I think it would require wine since they only offer the server for windows.

and what if you launch the Docker directly from within unraid, not using vncviewer? You can left click on the docker icon and choose webgui.

I just ended up mounting my new cache drive (nvme) through unraid, having unraid format as btrfs ( no problems). Then used UD to mount my old cache drive, copied over the contents, then unmounted and rebooted.

Not possible to format a fresh nvme drive to btrfs? (I want to format and mount ahead of time so I can copy my current cache contents over before removing the original cache drive) Nov 12 09:44:43 theark unassigned.devices: Formatting disk '/dev/nvme0n1' with 'btrfs' filesystem. Nov 12 09:44:43 theark unassigned.devices: Format disk '/dev/nvme0n1' with 'btrfs' filesystem result: btrfs-progs v4.7.2 See http://btrfs.wiki.kernel.org for more information. Nov 12 09:44:43 theark unassigned.devices: Format disk '/dev/nvme0n1' with 'btrfs' filesystem failed! Nov 12 09:45:04 theark rc.diskinfo[8174]: PHP Warning: Missing argument 2 for force_reload() in /etc/rc.d/rc.diskinfo on line 691 theark-diagnostics-20171112-0958.zip

Confirmed, back up and running. Was close to picking up a key. But some more beta testing would be nice :-)

Alright got it. I see after a reboot my server went to /dev/sr0, problem #1 :-) And damn, you even added a nice little note in your docker explaining how to add an optional drive. Needless to say, I got it. Thank you for adding this!!

No, I removed that parameter before updating. Is that what I'm missing? If so, I feel silly. New to docker, I am getting the feeling that the standard docker layout is universal for all containers, and that parameter is needed to pass a devices through. Yep, let me test that :-)

I give, am I just not seeing /dev/sr1 ?

Updated, but didn't see my sata drive. Also tried the same additional option like we use in makemkv, also no bueno. I assume it's something different we need to do?

Anything special to get it going, or just update and *poof*?!

Yep, I understand. Typically you need a middleman to hijack the encryption (AnyDVD). But handbrake can still be used for non encoded disc read/writes.

Anything special that needs to be done in order to get a SATA connected Blu-Ray drive to be picked up by this docker? I got MakeMKV working fine with the --device additional argument.

Thanks, all setup:

Sigh.... yet another @Djoss docker to install.

Champion!

Sorry if it's not spelled out. If I want to add either a USB drive, or SATA drive, I would add the path here (add another path, port or variable, and choose device?)?

With @Djoss 's Handbrake docker utilizing 5800 and 5900, does running this docker at the same time create a conflict? EDIT: Or I assume this is a internal docker port vs external Unraid port? I assume the Unraid layer will create it's own published port for the app, and the Docker engine will keep track?

Awesome, thanks for this docker @Djoss!

Oh, that's a let down, any recommendations for someone wanting a nice, gui driven backup tool compatible with unraid? And I assume it is now too late to install the home version for current and future use, without the intent of using cloud services?