ClintE

Exactly this. I kept hitting "Resend" and it messed everything up. "Cancel" button works. Interestingly, I haven't seen the issue after clicking "Cancel" on either server. BTW, this does not happen on an older version of unRAID that I haven't updated yet (think it's 6.7.something), perhaps because the plugins can't update on that old version.

After reboot, start array button is available. After hitting start button, I get the "resend" requester twice before getting the screen without stop array button, just reboot and shutdown. When booting in safe mode, array starts, whether UD is installed or not. Then I get all array control buttons available. Update: Noticed the status bar at bottom of screen says "Array Stopped" and "Stale Configuration". Docker containers and a single VM working.

After start array button press, I get "resend" requester twice from browser (Firefox). Same on other browser (Chrome).

Much appreciated! ur1-diagnostics-20230110-1441.zip

Same as if uninstalling plugin, array starts.

ur1-diagnostics-20230110-1338.zip

Hello, Haven't seen anything like this in cursory scan of posts here, but that's not saying there's nothing in here about the issue. After installation of UD plugin, when starting array, I get the unRAID "busy" indicator for a bit, then it flashes the screen with all the buttons (for when array is started), then all I get are reboot and shutdown buttons. Array does not start. If I reboot, then I get Start Array button with the other two, reboot and shutdown. Attempt to start array results in same. No other plugins installed except for CA Apps. This is happening with two servers. 6.11.5. Thanks!

Hello, Trying to bind 4x ports of Intel I350 ethernet card, but when doing it this way with the plugin, it only binds first two ports. All four ports are in their own group, and when I inspect the vfio-pci.cfg file, it shows all four devices enumerated properly. UnRAID version 6.7.2. Edit: Meant to say each ethernet port has its own group; four groups for the card. Thanks!

After almost a year and 2 licenses, loving unRaid! Please keep up the excellent work, and here's hoping for another great 14 years for Limetech!

If you use the unassigned devices on separate hardware mirrored volume or mirrored the other 2 SSD's on the NVMe card via software, that would probably fit the usage needs you described.

Hello All, I've been using (and testing) unRaid for several months now, having a great time learning and experimenting. Assembled a rather oversized server with dual E5-2687w's, 128GB ram, lots of expandable storage, NVMe cache drives, etc. I put together a second computer for gateway / ad-blocking / VPN / etc. use. It has single Xeon E5-2690 (2.9 GHz, 8 core, 16 thread), onboard Intel Gb nic, Intel I350-T4 V2 quad-port nic, 16GB ECC ram (supports up to 64GB), storage as needed. Plans are to run things like a pfSense VM, piHole (maybe, but considering just using pfblockerng), openvpn or other vpn server, some type of VPN client to existing provider, and other Docker containers, lxc's, lxd's (maybe), lightweight VM's. I am testing Proxmox right now for the gateway base OS. There is, like anything, a learning curve associated with this system. I'm starting to wonder if it might be easier and less time-consuming to just purchase a basic unRaid license to run on the gateway box. The cost of the basic unRaid license isn't a big deal to me. Is this type of unRaid usage worth experimenting with, considering I won't be using one of the primary functions of unRaid, the NAS part? Am i limiting myself by going this direction vs. Proxmox (or other hosting environment)? I've searched and haven't found much about people doing this type of thing with their unRaid system while not using the NAS functionality.

That's really quite the coincidence. It's quite difficult to find anyone that owns one of these cases outside of just a few people that posted little videos on YT. It's not the kind of case that "pops" in your face like so many out there. Someone could make it like that if they worked at it, but it's not really designed that way. More utilitarian and just plain big. Someone on Reddit said it's almost like a small apartment, and that's true; I can almost fit my old Thermaltake Armor case inside the main "bay" or whatever you want to call each side. Thanks for thinking of me, and have a great day!

Hello All, Just wanted to say that so far, after several months or so using unRAID, very satisfied user. Still learning every day. Thought it was so cool, maybe this was added before rc4, but when I clicked on "edit" box on dashboard page, I found the Case Model popup. Lo and behold, devs put my case in there, Thermaltake Core WP200! Haven't seen anyone using that case in the unRAID forums, at least not that anyone's mentioned. It doesn't seem like a very popular case, but it fit my needs perfectly. Haven't seen much about it even on Reddit. As a friend mentioned while I was searching for parts for the build, "If you're gonna put quite a bit in the machine, why not just spend a little more for something you will be satisfied with and use for a long time?" This got me to thinking about several aspects of the build, such as the case and power supply. Ended up with this monstrosity of a case and the (currently) only digital PSU that has gallium nitride transistors, the Corsair AX1600i. Yeah, way overkill for anything but 3 or 4 top-tier video cards and everything else, but it's really built to last and extremely efficient. Thanks for reading a couple thoughts from a new, still learning, but quite happy user of unRAID. Cheers!

It's called Dynamix System Information https://forums.unraid.net/topic/34889-dynamix-v6-plugins/ Lots of other great plugins also

You should be able to upgrade to 64gb ram with no problem. The Z370 motherboards can address 64gb in dual channel mode just like you're running now. Cheers!