halfelite

why not just spawn multiple ipref instances iperf3 -s -p 4500&; iperf3 -s -p 4501&; iperf3 -s -p 4502 & and have the multiple clients attach to each port

Perfect that worked like a charm Thanks for all your work.

Not sure if this has been discussed. But I have all my containers working with the new versions by adding additional_ports. My problem is getting those containers to talk to containers outside of the VPN. I use Sonarr and plex. Currently Sonarr is function as it should and routing through sabnzbvpn But I have a connection setup in sonaar to tell plex when to update. I have tried the host ip and Local host. I assume the IPtables no longer allow this. My plex is setup as host, Sab as bridge and sonaar connecting through sab.

Inside plex turn off everything DLNA related. I bet you are filling your log files to fast with all that messy talk. inside plex goto settings and DLNA and uncheck Enable the DLNA server

Update your Vm's looks like you are running the beta so network on a VM is most likely set to the old driver that caused this In most cases this can be accomplished simply by clicking Update in "Form View" on the VM Edit page.

Before you totally go around changing settings on everything. Did you update your UDM to the newest beta. It was/is a known issue with vlan traffic being routed out the 10gp sfp port to cause slowdowns and issues and in general terrible performance enough that most were running the UDM pro over the gigabit line to the xg-16 to at least get 1gb vlan routing.

Couple things to try how many threads in iperf3? As you dont give much hardware specs are you sure the cards are in a full 8x slot. And not an 8x that shares pci lanes making it a 4x on bandwidth

It would not be the Docker itself. Have you modified the go file to include the following modprobe i915 chmod -R 777 /dev/dri as that will cause this. Also if not I would check the Bios settings for using the onbaord gpu. That would be the second spot to look. If you are using the VGA out on the X11SSM it is not connected to the iGPU its only connected to the Aspeed GPU for the BCM. Its under PCI settings if I remember right.

Do you have Plex setup for hardware encoding/decoding or anything where you are passing the GPU to a vm or docker. I have the same board as soon as I pass the intel GPU over to my plex docker I lose kvm support. This is issues with how supermicro handles integrated GPU's vs using the Aspeed GPU.

Another option. The more you try to reduce quality the more cpu you will be using. So if you have 1080p movies and are forcing them down to 480p for remote users you will be using more cpu then just streaming out 1080p. First almost all hardware supports direct streams of at least common video maybe not audio. So you might use less CPU telling your users to direct stream. Same with your local stuff make sure its direct playing so the server is not touching the audio/video.

Did you by chance write down the SN for your disk order? If not you will most likely have to pull disk by disk with the machine powered off. From your logs it found all these SN number so whatever SN number your cant find is the bad disk/cable WDC_WD60EFRX-68L0BN1_WD-WXB1HB4PHE51 (sdm) 512 11721045168 WDC_WD100EFAX-68LHPN0_JEGKRH8N (sdj) 512 19532873728 WDC_WD60EZRZ-00GZ5B1_WD-WX41D758N3XH (sdk) 512 11721045168 WDC_WD100EFAX-68LHPN0_JEK058PZ (sdh) 512 19532873728 WDC_WD60EZRX-00MVLB1_WD-WX71DA4A03D2 (sdg) 512 11721045168 WDC_WD100EFAX-68LHPN0_7JH9S9MC (sdd) 512 19532873728 WDC_WD100EFAX-68LHPN0_1SHMHJ8Z (sde) 512 19532873728 WDC_WD100EFAX-68LHPN0_1SHN4DRZ (sdb) 512 19532873728 WDC_WD60EZRX-00MVLB1_WD-WX11DA49HHVY (sdf) 512 11721045168 WDC_WD60EFRX-68L0BN1_WD-WXB1HB4XU9RN (sdc) 512 11721045168 WDC_WD60EZRX-00MVLB1_WD-WX11D741AYXK (sdn) 512 11721045168 WDC_WD60EFRX-68MYMN1_WD-WX11D55PXPDC (sdq) 512 11721045168 SAMSUNG_MZVLW1T0HMLH-00000_S2U3NX0J701572 (nvme1n1) 512 2000409264 INTEL_SSDPEKKW020T8_BTHH902417BB2P0F (nvme0n1) 512 4000797360 WDC_WD60EZRX-00MVLB1_WD-WXK1H641XM4J (sdo) 512 11721045168 WDC_WD60EZRX-00MVLB1_WD-WX31D55A4944 (sdl) 512 11721045168 WDC_WD100EFAX-68LHPN0_2TK47D2D (sdi) 512 19532873728

What are the smart Stats on disk 5 and 6 Also could be a bad controller if all start failing.

This is fixable. Remember the HW decoding they are doing is more of a work around. You need to adjust the script to tell it to not play AVI files with the -hwaccel parameter #!/bin/bash marap=$(cut -c 10-14 <<<"$@") if [ $marap == "mpeg4" ]; then exec /usr/lib/plexmediaserver/Plex\ Transcoder2 "$@" else exec /usr/lib/plexmediaserver/Plex\ Transcoder2 -hwaccel nvdec "$@" fi

Long story short I started moving my Array over to xfs encrypted following this guide https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uPPnY3jbRKg . Everything worked out fine for the first drive just takes forever moving that much data around. I have some brand new 10TB drives I have yet to install in Unraid. My thinking was is it safe to install a new 10TB drive assign it to the array and have it formatted xfs encrypted but not assigned to any shares. then use unbalancer plugin to copy data from a non encrypted disk to the newly installed 10TB drive. Stop the array use new config tool to wipe out drive assignments then assign the new 10TB encrypted drive in the spot of the old non encrypted drive. So drive2 10tb non encrypted belongs to one user share drive9 10tb encrypted belongs to no user shares Copy data from drive2 to drive9 using unbalancer stop array wipe out config reassign drive9 to drive drive2. Thanks.

I seem to be having an issue with the way files are transferred from my Ubuntu VM to the user share. While making the VM I set the map for /mnt/users to mount to /mnt/Array on the VM. I then setup my fstab as such. Array /mnt/Array 9p trans=virtio,version=9p2000.L,_netdev,rw 0 0 What I end up getting on the user share is files owned by root as that is the user on the VM. -rw-rw-rw- 1 root root 851252652 Dec 11 18:55 Camera.Feed.121118.mpeg To correct this I have been running a crontab under unraid every night that runs chown -R nobody:users and chmod -R 777 to get permissions back so samba users and unraid can make changes to the files. Is there a better way to accomplish this? Thanks.

Could be my misunderstanding of how cache functions. I guess If I have cache set to on for a share. If I write anything to /mnt/user/share it will hit the cache drive first? I thought user0 bypassed cache altogether.

Just wanting to make sure I am setting this correctly. In the mount script I would like to have two setups basically a read directory and a read/write directory that writes to the cache drive for Mover to handle later to move it to the array. #Read Directory mkdir /mnt/cache/FTP/Read/Movies;mount --bind /mnt/user0/Movies /mnt/cache/FTP/Read/Movies mkdir /mnt/cache/FTP/Read/TV-Shows;mount --bind /mnt/user0/TV-Shows /mnt/cache/FTP/Read/TV-Shows #Read Write to cache folder for mover to handle later mkdir /mnt/cache/FTP/Write/Movies;mount --bind /mnt/user/Movies /mnt/cache/FTP/Read/Movies mkdir /mnt/cache/FTP/Write/TV-Shows;mount --bind /mnt/user/TV-Shows /mnt/cache/FTP/Read/TV-Shows Then I would have FTPUSER-READ /mnt/cache/FTP/Read/ FTPUSER-WRITE /mnt/cache/FTP/Write/ Is there any issue with having FTP write to user instead of user0