emod

Members
  • Content Count

    56
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Community Reputation

1 Neutral

About emod

  • Rank
    Newbie

Recent Profile Visitors

The recent visitors block is disabled and is not being shown to other users.

  1. My USB is dead, and my USB backup, app backup is all on encrypted drive. What are steps to get back up and running? My idea is to create a new bootable USB, start UNRAID, then de-crypt the drives, then restore USB configuration from backup. Is that the right sequence? Also how do I find out the order of my drives. I only have parity drive (10TB) and 2 discs (4TB and 2TB). So I KNOW which is parity drive. How do I find out sequence of other drives?
  2. No. Issues I first saw with 6.8.3 remained, plus: I cannot access apps (loading apps never finishes), Docker returned but many apps have "?" in lieu of app icon. mail server is stopped and cannot be started. Unable to access diagnostics page (the one I provided I manually copied from server onto USB - I attached monitor/mouse/keyb directly to server).
  3. Done. ping 8.8.8.8 PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=119 time=10.8 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=2 ttl=119 time=13.3 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=3 ttl=119 time=6.22 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=4 ttl=119 time=9.14 ms ping www.google.com PING www.google.com (172.217.8.4) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from iad23s59-in-f4.1e100.net (172.217.8.4): icmp_seq=1 ttl=118 time=9.50 ms 64 bytes from iad23s59-in-f4.1e100.net (172.217.8.4): icmp_seq=2 ttl=118 time=12.1 ms 64 bytes from iad23s59-in-
  4. 1. PING 8.8.8.8 (8.8.8.8) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=1 ttl=119 time=9.32 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=2 ttl=119 time=12.2 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=3 ttl=119 time=5.64 ms 64 bytes from 8.8.8.8: icmp_seq=4 ttl=119 time=9.27 ms .... 2. 64 bytes from yul03s04-in-f4.1e100.net (172.217.13.164): icmp_seq=1 ttl=117 time=18.8 ms 64 bytes from yul06s04-in-f4.1e100.net (172.217.13.164): icmp_seq=2 ttl=117 time=23.3 ms 64 bytes from yul06s04-in-f4.1e100.net (172.217.13.164): icmp_seq=3 ttl=117 time=17.1 ms 64 bytes from yul06s04-in-
  5. It's interesting that I never initiated personal attacks against any forum member (I did react to few insulting ones that were targeting me for sure), yet you quoted me? Very interesting. And after you posted your plea, another member just posted another post, not adding anything to the solution, but, unsuccessfully, trying to be cynical.
  6. I posted diagnostics more than an hour before you posted your reply. Why didn't you read them? You might give an example of a "rational person" if you read posts before you react. If you'd like to set an example of a "rational person", then carefully read the entire thread before reacting. If the way you react you seem fit (given ignorance of not reading the post and data provided), then you are no better than me. The problem was triggered exclusively by updating UNRAID (and I've done that numerous time), with no changes to any other infrastructure components. "Bashing"? No, war
  7. I'm not sure what you mean by "eliminate that"? I already looked into pfsense: no changes made since May this year (firewall rules and NAT are set up correctly). From pfsense I can ping UNRAID just fine. DHCP server correctly assigns a static IP to UNRAID server: the assignment is active. Server is using the same gateway like the wifi for few other devices. If access to internet were not possible, those devices wouldn't have access to internet either.
  8. Good question. For all things I modified on UNRAID I followed SpaceinvaderOne videos - so maybe there were network changes there? Still, I haven't installed or removed anything on UNRAID in over 6 months, and had restarted the server 4-5 times during that time. I did not encounter issue like the one today. I'll delete config/network.cfg from the flash drive, reboot and see what happens.
  9. I raised an issue in CAPS, consistent with the severity of problem that I encountered, and which showed SEVERELY corrupted UNRAID functions that might even have corrupted personal data on my disk (maybe that's another discovery). I attacked the problem, you attack me. Is that "proper" action in your mind? Is that example you are trying to set? Why don't you ask yourself what is the "proper action" to reacting to issues raised: attack the problem or attack the person?
  10. I'll be glad to wait and follow intelligent advice, but apparently one user finds it important to make a political statement, another one makes personal attacks, and so on. I pointed a problem at UNRAID software, not at any person on this forum. Instead of trying to solve the problem, some are engaging in personal attacks. You think that helps?
  11. I posted diagnostics 20 minutes before you posted your comment. Why are writing that I have not posted diagnostics?
  12. And replying/commenting like one won't help either. I posted a serious problems to alert other users. You downplaying it or making fun of it (or making a political issue out of it) will not make it any less sever - it will just raise questions if you are trying to silence someone because there is a problem that you do not know solution to. It erodes your credibility, not mine.
  13. "Do you really think it would have been released if what you describe is a general problem?" Yes. RE internet problems: I have not changed a single setting on my router or my server that even remotely pertains to ports or local network. The only thing that was done was updating UNRAID. Nothing else. Given that no other network changes happened, I can safely say that the UNRAID update did something wrong. Btw, internet/network problems would not make "Docker" tab disappear.
  14. "A very large group of users is using version 6.8.3 without any issue for quite some time (including myself)" Prove it. Change title to WHAT? Any suggestions? Diagnostics from where?