Jump to content
We're Hiring! Full Stack Developer ×

itimpi

Moderators
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    20,238

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    55

 Content Type 

Everything posted by itimpi

  1. itimpi
    In theory one could do clever things by going under the hood and manipulating the underlying Linux file/folder level permissions, but in practice for most purposes file security and share level security end up being the same thing when using Unraid.
  2. itimpi
    If you are remote it just acts like a standard network disk that is offline until you establish the WireGuard tunnel, and then it behaves just as it would on your local LAN
  3. itimpi
    Be interested in the response you get I wrote that script a long time ago, but if there is still interest in it and it’s capabilities are not superseded by something else I may look at reworking it to be a plugin which should make it friendlier to use.
  4. itimpi
    What you are asking for is not compatible with how Unraid is designed to work as security of folders/files is managed at the share level.
  5. itimpi
    It should not trigger a parity rebuild unless something happened as formatting is just treated like ay other write operation. This suggests something else must have happened as well. Unfortunately it is not that simple as even an empty disk is not all zeros and its contents are included in any parity calculations as parity works at the raw sector level. I suggest you post your system's diagnostics zip file to see if we can figure out from it exactly what has happened and this the best way forward.
  6. itimpi
    3) Unraid has the WireGuard VPN Server+client built in and this provides a secure way to access you server from the internet. This is what I use to be able to access my files, etc remotely from my Apple Devices and from a remote Windows system. Unraid also provides the MyServers plugin that provides (amongst other features) for remotely administering your Unraid servers.
  7. itimpi
    Turn off whatever you did to enable that level of logging - it is not standard.
  8. itimpi
    You seem to have very verbose Samba logging enabled and that is what us filling your log.
  9. itimpi
    Which share(s) were you expecting to be moved to the array? The ‘Prefer’ setting means you want the files on the cache if there is space. You need the ‘yes’ setting for a share if you want any files that are on the cache to be moved to the array. The help built into the GUI explains this.
  10. itimpi
    The checksums are stored as part of the extended attributes for the file they relate to.
  11. itimpi
    I believe that is a known issue depending on what browser you are using to access the GUI. I have always seen this behaviour using Microsoft Edge.
  12. itimpi
    Not sure - see my previous post - I personally think this is a bug.
  13. itimpi
    There used to be a bug where Unraid would take the larger of the Minimum Free Space values for the share and the pool in deciding whether a file would fit on the pool. These settings should be independent of each other - one applying to the pool and the other to the array but I wonder if that is not how it is being handled.
  14. itimpi
    I would suggest you at least post your diagnostics zip file to your next post in this thread so we can see what is going on.
  15. itimpi
    @limetech Is the Unraid Boot menu code available anywhere? I am interested in making the changes that would make the Unraid Boot Menu UEFI aware and handle memtest entry accordingly. Most of the work appears to be in the GUI code for maintaining the syslinux entries, but some small changes need to be made to the Boot Menu in UEFI and Legacy mode to handle the memtest part of it differently in the two cases. IF you already have such a work package in hand then great, but if not I am prepared to offer my services to work on it.
  16. itimpi
    Yes
  17. itimpi
    I wonder if there is a bug in that a multi-drive pool is automatically being considered protected without taking into account the profile used?
  18. itimpi
    The default for a pool is to use the btrfs raid1 profile. This gives you redundancy for files on the pool but at the expense of less usable space. You can click on the pool on the Main tab to switch it to a profile (e.g. Single) that will give you increased usable space but at the expense of losing redundancy.
  19. itimpi
    You are likely to get better informed feedback if you attach your system’s diagnostics zip file to your next post in this thread to see if we can spot anything.
  20. itimpi
    Not unless you want to keep losing your appdata information You need to correct the errors as suggested by @Squid
  21. itimpi
    Most safes would be bolted to the floor/wall and to get at the bolts one has to get inside the safe anyway.
  22. itimpi
    The change I think would be worth making at the Unraid level is to change the boot menu when in UEFI mode to not include the memtest option since it does not work in that mode. Perhaps a different entry that points out a version from memtest86.com is needed?
  23. itimpi
    It would be easiest to simply replace each drive in turn to a larger one and let Unraid rebuild its data. In each case you will have the removed drive available with its data intact until you are confident that the rebuilt has been successful.
  24. itimpi
    What are the sizes of your data drive and the parity drive? Once the parity build has gone past the size of a data drive then that data drive can be spun down as it is no longer needed.
  25. itimpi
    It is a known issue with some models of Samsung SSD that they can erroneously report a temperature of exactly 84C.
×
×
  • Create New...